27,652
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 140:
Line 140: + +
→.com Renewals
===.com Renewals===
===.com Renewals===
The dropping of the aforemetioned litigation between Verisign and ICANN seems to have cleared the way for the renewal of the [[.com]] registry agreement from 2005 through 2012.<ref>[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/25/verisign_icann_deal/ Verisign ICANN deal, TheRegister.co.uk]</ref> The agreement and its appendices can be viewed via the ICANN site, [http://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/registries/com here].
The dropping of the aforemetioned litigation between Verisign and ICANN seems to have cleared the way for the renewal of the [[.com]] registry agreement from 2005 through 2012.<ref>[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/25/verisign_icann_deal/ Verisign ICANN deal, TheRegister.co.uk]</ref> The agreement and its appendices can be viewed via the ICANN site, [http://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/registries/com here].
In August, 2012, 3 of [[ICANN]]'s Constituencies ([[ALAC]], [[GNSO]] [[Business Constituency]], [[GNSO]] [[Intellectual Property Constituency]]) sent a letter to the organization complaining that the organization held its renewal talks with [[Verisign]] behind closed doors and the result is that there are no [[Whois|Thick Whois]] requirements for the .com TLD.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2012/08/21/constituencies-blast-icanns-closed-door-verisign-com-contract-renewal/ Constituencies Blast ICANNs Closed Door Verisign Com Contract Renewal, DomainNameWire.com]</ref>
===.net Renewals===
===.net Renewals===