Changes

* 10th May, 2009—Draft Report of [[ICANN]]’s [[Implementation Recommendation Team]]<ref>[http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/amc/en/docs/icann100509.pdf Draft Report of ICANN’s Implementation Recommendation Team]</ref>

* 10th May, 2009—Draft Report of [[ICANN]]’s [[Implementation Recommendation Team]]<ref>[http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/amc/en/docs/icann100509.pdf Draft Report of ICANN’s Implementation Recommendation Team]</ref>

===Related to UDRP===

===UDRP Discussions===

* 15th July, 2011-- WIPO’s Observation on [[ICANN]] Staff “Preliminary Issue Report on the Current State of the [[UDRP]]”<ref>[http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/amc/en/docs/icann150711.pdf WIPO’s Observation on ICANN Staff “Preliminary Issue Report on the Current State of the UDRP”]</ref>

* July 15th, 2011-- WIPO’s Observation on [[ICANN]] Staff “Preliminary Issue Report on the Current State of the [[UDRP]]”<ref>[http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/amc/en/docs/icann150711.pdf WIPO’s Observation on ICANN Staff “Preliminary Issue Report on the Current State of the UDRP”]</ref>

# [[ICANN Board]] has assured of Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) stability.

# [[ICANN Board]] assured of Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) stability

# The focus of registration abuse review should be on [[cybersquatting]] instead of [[UDRP]].

# The focus of registration abuse review should be on [[cybersquatting]] instead of [[UDRP]]

# In case of new processes make sure that they are driven by some experts and focused in right direction.

# In case of new processes make sure that they are driven by some experts and focused in the right direction

# Distinctions between processes/policies are complex, the issues which are listed does not fall within the [UDRP]]’s scope and are subject to determination of panel.

# Distinctions between processes/policies are complex, the issues which are listed do not fall within the [UDRP]]’s scope and are subject to determination of panel

# The Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) should perform its job freely.

# The Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) should perform its job freely

* 6th May, 2011--WIPO’s observations to [[ICANN]] on Policy Staff/[[GNSO]] Council “Current State of the UDRP Webinar”<ref>[http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/amc/en/docs/icann060511.pdf WIPO’s observations to ICANN on Policy Staff/GNSO Council “Current State of the UDRP Webinar”]</ref>

* May 6th, 2011--WIPO’s observations to [[ICANN]] on Policy Staff/[[GNSO]] Council “Current State of the UDRP Webinar”<ref>[http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/amc/en/docs/icann060511.pdf WIPO’s observations to ICANN on Policy Staff/GNSO Council “Current State of the UDRP Webinar”]</ref>

# Domain Name Registrants, Trademark owners and Registration authorities have been offered effective solutions by the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP).

# Domain Name Registrants, Trademark owners and Registration authorities have been offered effective solutions by the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)

# The [[UDRP]] has been a fair and flexible resolution system and has accommodated various evolving practices and norms.

# The [[UDRP]] has been a fair and flexible resolution system and has accommodated various evolving practices and norms

# As [[ICANN]] is thinking of expanding the [[DNS]] framework and there are some [[RPM]]s, which are in their testing phase; the time is wrong to modify the [[UDRP]].

# As [[ICANN]] is thinking of expanding the [[DNS]] framework and there are some [[RPM]]s, which are in their testing phase; the time is wrong to modify the [[UDRP]]

# The modification process of [[ICANN]] would end up in diluting and overburdening the [[UDRP]].

# The modification process would end up diluting and overburdening the [[UDRP]]

# [[ICANN]] must address the basic questions about cybersquatting’s [[DNS]] and business beneficiaries before looking into mechanism for addressing this practice.

# [[ICANN]] must address the basic questions about [[cybersquatting]]’s [[DNS]] and business beneficiaries before looking into mechanism for addressing this practice

* 26th March, 2010-- WIPO’s observations on “Registration Abuse Policies Working Group Initial Report”<ref>[http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/amc/en/docs/icann050511.pdf WIPO’s observations on “Registration Abuse Policies Working Group Initial Report”]</ref>

* March 26th, 2010-- WIPO’s observations on “Registration Abuse Policies Working Group Initial Report”<ref>[http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/amc/en/docs/icann050511.pdf WIPO’s observations on “Registration Abuse Policies Working Group Initial Report”]</ref>

# The [[UDRP]] has been included in the initial report of [[RAP WG]], but the idea behind it is not clear, especially against new [[gTLD]] program of [[ICANN]].

# The [[UDRP]] has been included in the initial report of [[RAP WG]], but the idea behind it is not clear, especially with regards to the [[new gTLD Program|new gTLD program]]

# It seems that new [[gTLD]] program of [[ICANN]] has already addressed the Cybersquatting Recommendation.

# It seems that new [[gTLD]] program has already addressed the cybersquatting recommendations

# [[ICANN]] must focus more on mechanisms rather then amending the [[UDRP]]. This will yield better results and will help in the long run.

# [[ICANN]] must focus more on mechanisms rather then amending the [[UDRP]], which will yield better results and will help in the long run

# [[UDRP]]’s integrity depends more on providers chosen by [[ICANN]].

# The [[UDRP]]’s integrity depends more on the UDRP providers chosen by [[ICANN]]

 

==WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center==

==WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center==