Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/dot-gop-domain-newest-and-one-funniest-internet-memes is a page on that soi-disant "progressive" organization's Web site which lampooned the RNC's selling .gop addresses.  Is this notable enough to include in the article [[.gop]]? [[User:Loupgarous|Loupgarous]] ([[User talk:Loupgarous|talk]]) 16:18, 17 October 2016 (PDT)
 
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/dot-gop-domain-newest-and-one-funniest-internet-memes is a page on that soi-disant "progressive" organization's Web site which lampooned the RNC's selling .gop addresses.  Is this notable enough to include in the article [[.gop]]? [[User:Loupgarous|Loupgarous]] ([[User talk:Loupgarous|talk]]) 16:18, 17 October 2016 (PDT)
 +
 +
==Not notable enough to justify inclusion==
 +
Since this does not consider actual registrations, but rather an internet meme that effectively parodies the Republican party. I do not believe that it is newsorthy or notable enough to justify it's inclusion in the article, especially given the partisan nature of the article. Thanks for sharing though. [[User:Dustin Phillips|Dustin Phillips]] ([[User talk:Dustin Phillips|talk]]) 13:12, 23 October 2016 (PDT)
Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, lookupuser, staff, Administrators, translator
11,770

edits

Navigation menu