3,197
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 26:
Line 26: + + +
no edit summary
<blockquote>As used in this paragraph, the term “traffics in” refers to transactions that include, but are not limited to, sales, purchases, loans, pledges, licenses, exchanges of currency, and any other transfer for consideration or receipt in exchange for consideration.<ref name="cornell" /></blockquote>
<blockquote>As used in this paragraph, the term “traffics in” refers to transactions that include, but are not limited to, sales, purchases, loans, pledges, licenses, exchanges of currency, and any other transfer for consideration or receipt in exchange for consideration.<ref name="cornell" /></blockquote>
ACCPA applied to all domain registrations, past, present, and future. However, statutory damages were only available to plaintiffs in cybersquatting cases where the domain was registered after the effective date of the law.<ref name="accpa" />
ACCPA applied to all domain registrations, past, present, and future. However, statutory damages were only available to plaintiffs in cybersquatting cases where the domain was registered after the effective date of the law.<ref name="accpa" />
In the same timeframe, the U.S. Department of Commerce drafted the white paper that led to the creation of ICANN. The white paper also stated the Commerce Department's intention to ask [[WIPO]] to study and formulate solutions to trademark issues around domain names.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/unthemed-pages/white-paper-2012-02-25-en US Dept. of Commerce - Management of Internet Names and Addresses], archived on ICANN.org]</ref> WIPO presented their study to the newly-formed ICANN in April 1999.<ref name="udrphistory">[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/schedule-2012-02-25-en ICANN.org - Timeline for the Forumulation & Implementation of the UDRP]</ref>
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}