Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:  
The Final Report received a total of nine public comments during the public comment period. Comments largely came from ICANN bodies and stakeholder constituencies: comments were received from the ALAC and the GAC, as well as from the Business Constituency, IP Constituency, gTLD Registries Stakeholders Group, and Noncommercial Stakeholders Group. Comments were also received from the International Trademark Association, the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, and John Poole.<ref name="pcreport">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/report-comments-cct-final-recs-01feb19-en.pdf Staff Report of Public Comment Proceeding], February 1, 2019</ref>
 
The Final Report received a total of nine public comments during the public comment period. Comments largely came from ICANN bodies and stakeholder constituencies: comments were received from the ALAC and the GAC, as well as from the Business Constituency, IP Constituency, gTLD Registries Stakeholders Group, and Noncommercial Stakeholders Group. Comments were also received from the International Trademark Association, the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, and John Poole.<ref name="pcreport">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/report-comments-cct-final-recs-01feb19-en.pdf Staff Report of Public Comment Proceeding], February 1, 2019</ref>
   −
ICANN Staff found substantial differences of opinion regarding the Final Report and its recommendations.  
+
ICANN Staff found substantial differences of opinion in the comments regarding the scope, commitment of resources, and relative importance of the recommendations. There were divergent opinions on many of the specific recommendations, and few instances of full consensus.<ref name="pcreport" />
 +
 
 
===Board Reception and Recommendation Scorecard===
 
===Board Reception and Recommendation Scorecard===
 +
The ICANN Board provided extensive detail on its decision-making process in its resolution adopting the Final Report.<ref name="bres">[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2019-03-01-en#1.a ICANN Board Resolution], March 1, 2019 (CCT Report)</ref> The Board accepted six of the report's recommendations for implementation, delegated or directed some recommendations to the relevant supporting organization or working group, and reserved action on some recommendations.<ref name="bres" /> The Board summarized its actions in a recommendation scorecard attached to the resolution.<ref name="scorecard" />
 +
 +
The six recommendations that were accepted tended toward broad outlines of policy guidance, rather than specific policies:
 +
# Recommendation 1: Formalize and promote ongoing data collection.
 +
# Recommendation 17: ICANN should collect data about and publicize the chain of parties responsible for gTLD domain name registrations.
 +
# Recommendation 21: Include more detailed information on the subject matter of complaints in ICANN publicly available
 +
compliance reports.
 +
# Recommendation 22: Initiate engagement with relevant stakeholders to determine what best practices are being implemented to offer reasonable and appropriate security measures commensurate with the offering of services that involve the gathering of sensitive health and financial information.
 +
# Recommendation 30: Expand and improve outreach into the Global South.
 +
# Recommendation 31: The ICANN organization to coordinate the pro bono assistance program.*<ref name="scorecard" />
    +
''*Contingent upon the SUBPRO working group deciding to maintain the pro bono assistance program in subsequent rounds''
    
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
3,197

edits

Navigation menu