Changes

<blockquote>especially...now that the NomCom also appoints two members of the Board of Directors of Public Technical Identifiers (PTI), an affiliate of ICANN, and the current IANA functions operator. Given its mandate, the RSSAC believes its liaison can provide valuable insight to inform discussions and deliberations about the operational and technical expertise necessary to serve in these leadership positions.

<blockquote>especially...now that the NomCom also appoints two members of the Board of Directors of Public Technical Identifiers (PTI), an affiliate of ICANN, and the current IANA functions operator. Given its mandate, the RSSAC believes its liaison can provide valuable insight to inform discussions and deliberations about the operational and technical expertise necessary to serve in these leadership positions.

<br />

<br />

However, the RSSAC will make a determination on the voting status of its liaison after the recommendations are more fully vetted by the NomCom, the ICANN Board and its Organizational Effectiveness Committee, the broader ICANN community, and after its own thorough review of the options for this change and the subsequent implications.

However, the RSSAC will make a determination on the voting status of its liaison after the recommendations are more fully vetted by the NomCom, the ICANN Board and its Organizational Effectiveness Committee, the broader ICANN community, and after its own thorough review of the options for this change and the subsequent implications.<ref>[http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-nomcom2-review-27mar18/attachments/20180508/4bf13e73/rssac-035-en-0001.pdf NomCom2 Draft Final Report Listserv - RSSAC Comments], May 7, 2018</ref></blockquote>

<ref>[http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-nomcom2-review-27mar18/attachments/20180508/4bf13e73/rssac-035-en-0001.pdf NomCom2 Draft Final Report Listserv - RSSAC Comments], May 7, 2018</ref></blockquote>

The ALAC simply "agreed" with the recommendation.<ref name="alacpc">[http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-nomcom2-review-27mar18/attachments/20180511/9f710525/AL-ALAC-ST-0507-01-01-EN-0001.pdf NomCom2 Draft Final Report Listserv - ALAC Comment], May 11, 2018</ref>

The ALAC simply "agreed" with the recommendation.<ref name="alacpc">[http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-nomcom2-review-27mar18/attachments/20180511/9f710525/AL-ALAC-ST-0507-01-01-EN-0001.pdf NomCom2 Draft Final Report Listserv - ALAC Comment], May 11, 2018</ref>

* The [[RrSG]] suggested that the continuous improvement of the NomCom as a "one-and-done," annual committee, was not best effectuated by a five-year review cycle. They proposed a standing committee, formed of ex-NomCom and ex-Board members, and possibly also the current Chair-elect and/or Associate Chair, that "could be given the responsibility for improving the productivity, transparency and accountability of the NomCom."<ref>[http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-nomcom2-review-27mar18/attachments/20180507/92972307/RrSGResponse-DraftFinalReportoftheNomCom2Review1.pdf NomCom2 Draft Final Report Listserv  - RrSG Comment], May 7, 2018</ref> The [[IPC]] expressed agreement with this concept in its comment.<ref>[http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-nomcom2-review-27mar18/attachments/20180508/d027a3da/IPCCommentsreDraftFinalReviewofNomCom2Report050718.pdf NomCom2 Draft Final Report Listserv - IPC Comment], May 11, 2018</ref>

* The [[RrSG]] suggested that the continuous improvement of the NomCom as a "one-and-done," annual committee, was not best effectuated by a five-year review cycle. They proposed a standing committee, formed of ex-NomCom and ex-Board members, and possibly also the current Chair-elect and/or Associate Chair, that "could be given the responsibility for improving the productivity, transparency and accountability of the NomCom."<ref>[http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-nomcom2-review-27mar18/attachments/20180507/92972307/RrSGResponse-DraftFinalReportoftheNomCom2Review1.pdf NomCom2 Draft Final Report Listserv  - RrSG Comment], May 7, 2018</ref> The [[IPC]] expressed agreement with this concept in its comment.<ref>[http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-nomcom2-review-27mar18/attachments/20180508/d027a3da/IPCCommentsreDraftFinalReviewofNomCom2Report050718.pdf NomCom2 Draft Final Report Listserv - IPC Comment], May 11, 2018</ref>