3,197
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 129:
Line 129: − + − + + + + + + + + + + + + +
no edit summary
The FAAIP was submitted to the [[Organizational Effectiveness Committee]] (OEC) in December 2018.<ref name="dashboard" /> The OEC discussed the FAAIP and approved its submission to the board in February 2019.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-oec-2019-04-17-en OEC Meeting Minutes - Affirmation of Actions Taken via Email], April 17, 2019</ref> On March 14, 2019 the board approved the FAAIP and instructed the IPT to convene an implementation working group (IWG) to create a detailed implementation plan, oversee the implementation, and communicate with the OEC regarding progress.<ref name="impreso" /> A call for volunteers for the IWG followed on March 25, 2019.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2019-03-25-en ICANN.org Announcement - Call for Volunteers for the IWG], March 25, 2019</ref> Again, the membership of the group included members of the IPT, and the RWP before it.<ref name="impplan">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/nomcom-implementation-plan-15sep19-en.pdf ICANN.org Archive - NomCom2 Implementation Plan], September 15, 2019</ref>
The FAAIP was submitted to the [[Organizational Effectiveness Committee]] (OEC) in December 2018.<ref name="dashboard" /> The OEC discussed the FAAIP and approved its submission to the board in February 2019.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-oec-2019-04-17-en OEC Meeting Minutes - Affirmation of Actions Taken via Email], April 17, 2019</ref> On March 14, 2019 the board approved the FAAIP and instructed the IPT to convene an implementation working group (IWG) to create a detailed implementation plan, oversee the implementation, and communicate with the OEC regarding progress.<ref name="impreso" /> A call for volunteers for the IWG followed on March 25, 2019.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2019-03-25-en ICANN.org Announcement - Call for Volunteers for the IWG], March 25, 2019</ref> Again, the membership of the group included members of the IPT, and the RWP before it.<ref name="impplan">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/nomcom-implementation-plan-15sep19-en.pdf ICANN.org Archive - NomCom2 Implementation Plan], September 15, 2019</ref>
==Implementation Phase==
===Implementation Phase===
The IWG conducted a number of plenary sessions throughout 2019 in order to finalize the details of the implementation plan.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/OR/Team+Meetings+2019 NomCom2 Workspace - IWG Team meetings, 2019], last updated November 24, 2020</ref> In June 2019, the working group conducted a webinar to update the community on its progress and solicit feedback on its approach to implementation.<ref name="juneweb">[https://community.icann.org/display/OR/Webinar+-+NomCom+Review+Implementation+-+Status+Update+in+Preparation+for+ICANN65+-+Thursday%2C+13+June+2019+@+2300+UTC NomCom2 Workspace - IWG Implementation Status Update in Preparation for ICANN 65], June 13, 2019</ref> There were no public meetings of the IWG scheduled for [[ICANN 65]], so the webinar represented the only opportunity to engage with the IWG on the record before the meeting in Marrakech.<ref name="juneweb" />
The IWG conducted a number of plenary sessions throughout 2019 in order to finalize the details of the implementation plan.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/OR/Team+Meetings+2019 NomCom2 Workspace - IWG Team meetings, 2019], last updated November 24, 2020</ref> In June 2019, the working group conducted a webinar to update the community on its progress and solicit feedback on its approach to implementation.<ref name="juneweb">[https://community.icann.org/display/OR/Webinar+-+NomCom+Review+Implementation+-+Status+Update+in+Preparation+for+ICANN65+-+Thursday%2C+13+June+2019+@+2300+UTC NomCom2 Workspace - IWG Implementation Status Update in Preparation for ICANN 65], June 13, 2019</ref> There were no public meetings of the IWG scheduled for [[ICANN 65]], so the webinar represented the only opportunity to engage with the IWG on the record before the meeting in Marrakech.<ref name="juneweb" /> [[Tom Barrett]] highlighted six recommendations that the IWG solicited feedback on from the community:
* '''Recommendation 10''': Representation on the NomCom should be re-balanced immediately and then be reviewed every five years.
** ''IWG Question to Community'': What process, based on which principles, would you suggest for the implementation of this recommendation to rebalance the NomCom? And, what criteria should the overall allocation of all NomCom seats among the SO/ACs be based on?
* '''Recommendation 14''': Formalize communication between the NomCom and the Board, SOs/ACs, and the PTI Board in order to understand needed competencies and experience.
** ''IWG Question to Community'': What process would you suggest to formalize the communication of the needed competencies and experiences of NomCom appointees to your SO/AC?
* '''Recommendation 16''': Implement and codify a system for providing feedback to the NomCom regarding the contributions and participation of members up for re-appointment by the NomCom (i.e. for the Board, PTI, GNSO, ALAC and ccNSO)
** ''IWG Question to Community'': What process would you suggest to improve feedback to the NomCom regarding the contribution and participation of NomCom appointees members that wish to apply for re-appointment by the NomCom?
* '''Recommendation 24''': An empowered body of current and former NomCom members should be formed to ensure greater continuity across NomComs, and in particular, to recommend and assist in implementing improvements to NomCom operations.
** ''IWG Question to Community'': What process do you suggest should be put in place to help ensure cross-community consensus on developing the Charter and formation of this body? The Charter would address issues such as membership, term limits, number and allocation of seats?
* '''Recommendation 25''': Improve NomCom selection decisions by assessing the performance and needs of all bodies receiving NomCom appointees.
** ''IWG Question to Community'': What process would you suggest for your organization to inform and improve future NomCom appointments?
* '''Recommendation 27''': Provide clarity on desire for and definition of "independent directors" Upon clarification of desire and definition, determine the number of specific seats for "independent directors."
** ''IWG Question to Community'': What are your suggestions regarding the process of implementing of this recommendation?<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/OR/Webinar+-+NomCom+Review+Implementation+-+Status+Update+in+Preparation+for+ICANN65+-+Thursday%2C+13+June+2019+@+2300+UTC?preview=/109480704/111381561/NomComRIWG%20Pre-ICANN65%20Webinar.pdf NomCom2 Workspace - June Webinar Slides], June 13, 2019</ref>
The IWG submitted its implementation plan to the board on September 15, 2019.<ref name="impplan" /> The plan was approved by the board
The IWG submitted its implementation plan to the board on September 15, 2019.<ref name="impplan" /> The plan was approved by the board