14,932
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 34:
Line 34: − + Line 98:
Line 98: − + − + Line 115:
Line 115: − +
→Independent Examiner Draft Report
==Independent Examiner Draft Report==
==Independent Examiner Draft Report==
[[Westlake Governance Ltd]] was selected to perform the GNSO2 assessment in June 2014.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/westlake-governance-appointed-to-conduct-independent-review-of-the-gnso-23-6-2014-en ICANN.org Announcement - Westlake Governance Appointed to Conduct GNSO2 Review], June 23, 2014</ref> Westlake submitted its draft report for public comment in May 2015.<ref name="dashboard" />
[[Westlake Governance]] was selected to perform the GNSO2 assessment in June 2014.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/westlake-governance-appointed-to-conduct-independent-review-of-the-gnso-23-6-2014-en ICANN.org Announcement - Westlake Governance Appointed to Conduct GNSO2 Review], June 23, 2014</ref> Westlake submitted its draft report for public comment in May 2015.<ref name="dashboard" />
===Methodology===
===Methodology===
* Recommendation 6: That the GNSO record and regularly publish statistics on WG participation (including diversity statistics).
* Recommendation 6: That the GNSO record and regularly publish statistics on WG participation (including diversity statistics).
* Recommendation 7: That Stakeholder Groups (SGs) and Constituencies (Cs) explore and implement ways to engage more deeply with community members whose first language is other than English, as a means to overcoming language barriers.
* Recommendation 7: That Stakeholder Groups (SGs) and Constituencies (Cs) explore and implement ways to engage more deeply with community members whose first language is other than English, as a means to overcoming language barriers.
* Recommendation 12: That ICANN assess the feasibility of providing a real-time transcripting service in audio conferences for prioritised PDP WGs
* Recommendation 12: That ICANN assess the feasibility of providing a real-time transcribing service in audio conferences for prioritised PDP WGs
* Recommendation 19: As strategic manager rather than a policy body the GNSO Council should continue to focus on ensuring that a WG has been properly constituted, has thoroughly fulfilled the terms of its charter and has followed due process.
* Recommendation 19: As a strategic manager rather than a policy body the GNSO Council should continue to focus on ensuring that a WG has been properly constituted, has thoroughly fulfilled the terms of its charter and has followed due process.
* Recommendation 23: That the GNSO Council and SGs and Cs adhere to the published process for applications for new constituencies. That the ICANN Board in assessing an application satisfy itself that all parties have followed due process. Subject to the application meeting the conditions, the default outcome should be that a new Constituency is admitted.
* Recommendation 23: That the GNSO Council and SGs and Cs adhere to the published process for applications for new constituencies. That the ICANN Board in assessing an application satisfy itself that all parties have followed due process. Subject to the application meeting the conditions, the default outcome should be that a new Constituency is admitted.
* Recommendation 25: That the GNSO Council commission the development of, and implement, guidelines to provide assistance for groups wishing to establish a new Constituency.
* Recommendation 25: That the GNSO Council commission the development of, and implement, guidelines to provide assistance for groups wishing to establish a new Constituency.
* Recommendation 13: That ICANN evaluate one or more alternative decision support systems and experiment with these for supporting WGs.
* Recommendation 13: That ICANN evaluate one or more alternative decision support systems and experiment with these for supporting WGs.
* Recommendation 14: That the GNSO further explores PDP ‘chunking’ and examines each potential PDP as to its feasibility for breaking into discrete stages.
* Recommendation 14: That the GNSO further explores PDP ‘chunking’ and examines each potential PDP as to its feasibility for breaking into discrete stages.
* Recommendation 15: That the GNSO continues current PDP Improvements Project initiatives to address timeliness of the PDP.
* Recommendation 15: That the GNSO continues current PDP Improvements Project initiatives to address the timeliness of the PDP.
* Recommendation 16: That a policy impact assessment (PIA) be included as a standard part of any policy process.
* Recommendation 16: That a policy impact assessment (PIA) be included as a standard part of any policy process.
* Recommendation 17: That the practice of Working Group self-evaluation becomes standard at the completion of the WG’s work; and that these evaluations should be published and used as a basis for continual process improvement in the PDP.
* Recommendation 17: That the practice of Working Group self-evaluation becomes standard at the completion of the WG’s work; and that these evaluations should be published and used as a basis for continual process improvement in the PDP.