14,952
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 44:
Line 44: + + +
→Criticism
==Criticism==
==Criticism==
* The language of the voluntary framework definition for DNS Abuse is much narrower than what ICANN contracts define as abuse.<ref>[https://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/anti-counterfeiting/registry-and-registrar-dns-abuse-framework-positive-step-falls-short Framework's positive step fall short, World Trademark Review]</ref>
* The framework does not mention trademark/copyright infringement, counterfeiting, piracy, or [[cybersquatting]].<ref>[https://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/anti-counterfeiting/registry-and-registrar-dns-abuse-framework-positive-step-falls-short Framework's positive step fall short, World Trademark Review]</ref>
* Separating DNS abuse from website content abuse is meaningless in terms of reviewing and addressing online abuse.<ref>[https://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/anti-counterfeiting/registry-and-registrar-dns-abuse-framework-positive-step-falls-short Framework's positive step fall short, World Trademark Review]</ref>
==References==
==References==