Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 354: Line 354:  
=== EPDP Phase 2 ===
 
=== EPDP Phase 2 ===
 
====Deliberations and Initial Report====
 
====Deliberations and Initial Report====
In Phase 2, the EPDP team was tasked with addressing open issues left unresolved from Phase 1, addressing issues listed in the Annex to the Temporary Specification,<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/gtld-registration-data-specs-en/#annex ICANN.org - Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data: Annex-Important Issues for Further Community Action]</ref> and developing a standardized access system for nonpublic registration data.<ref name="finalrep">[https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/epdp-phase-2-temp-spec-gtld-registration-data-2-31jul20-en.pdf GNSO Archive - EPDP Temp Spec Phase 2 Final Report], July 31, 2020</ref>  The team's Initial Report was published for public comment in February 2020<ref name="2initrep">[https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/epdp-phase-2-initial-07feb20-en.pdf GNSO Archive - EPDP Temp Spec Phase 2 Initial Report], February 7, 2020 (PDF)</ref> The report outlined a proposed model for SSAD, where requests were sent to a centralized clearinghouse, and then action up on responses to were taken up by each contracted party, as applicable. The model was based on the following broad principles:
+
In Phase 2, the EPDP team was tasked with addressing open issues left unresolved from Phase 1, addressing issues listed in the Annex to the Temporary Specification,<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/gtld-registration-data-specs-en/#annex ICANN.org - Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data: Annex-Important Issues for Further Community Action]</ref> and developing a standardized access system for nonpublic registration data.<ref name="finalrep">[https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/epdp-phase-2-temp-spec-gtld-registration-data-2-31jul20-en.pdf GNSO Archive - EPDP Temp Spec Phase 2 Final Report], July 31, 2020</ref>  The team divided the issues into two priority tiers, with the SSAD as priority 1, and all other questions and issues as priority 2.<ref name="finalrep" /> This prioritization resulted in an initial report that was solely focused on the SSAD, with an addendum being released a month later that discussed priority 2 issues.<ref name="finalrep" /> The team initially considered two models for the SSAD: a fully centralized model where accreditation of requestors, request processing, and disclosure decisions were all handled within a single clearinghouse; and a decentralized model where requests were handled by contracted parties, with no central hub for requests. Neither model appeared to meet all the needs of a trusted system.<ref name="finalrep">
 +
 
 +
The team's Initial Report was published for public comment in February 2020<ref name="2initrep">[https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/epdp-phase-2-initial-07feb20-en.pdf GNSO Archive - EPDP Temp Spec Phase 2 Initial Report], February 7, 2020 (PDF)</ref> The report outlined a proposed hybrid model for SSAD, where requests were sent to a centralized clearinghouse, and then action on requests, decisions, and disclosure of requested information were taken up by each contracted party, as applicable. The model was based on the following broad principles:
 
* Ideally, receipt, authentication, and transmission of SSAD requests should be automated wherever feasible. Disclosure decisions may be automated to the extent feasible, but should be standardized as much as possible across decisions.
 
* Ideally, receipt, authentication, and transmission of SSAD requests should be automated wherever feasible. Disclosure decisions may be automated to the extent feasible, but should be standardized as much as possible across decisions.
 
* SSAD should be subject to continuous improvement, via a method of review and improvement that operates within the policies outlined by the EPDP, ICANN Bylaws, GNSO procedures & guidelines, and data protection legislation and regulation.
 
* SSAD should be subject to continuous improvement, via a method of review and improvement that operates within the policies outlined by the EPDP, ICANN Bylaws, GNSO procedures & guidelines, and data protection legislation and regulation.
Line 540: Line 542:  
| [https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/126430750/gnso-EPDP-P2-pcrt-Initial-Report-Recommendations_Rec19_20200415.docx GNSO Summary]
 
| [https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/126430750/gnso-EPDP-P2-pcrt-Initial-Report-Recommendations_Rec19_20200415.docx GNSO Summary]
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
====Addendum to Initial Report====
 +
Following the publication of the Initial Report, the EPDP team released an Addendum to the Initial Report in March 2020.<ref name="2addendum">[https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/124847621/EPDP%20Phase%202%20-%20%20Initial%20Report%20Priority%202%20Addendum%20-%2026%20March%202020.pdf EPDP Temp Spec Workspace - Addendum to Phase 2 Initial Report], March 20, 2020</ref> The addendum reported the team's deliberation of the priority 2 issues delegated to Phase 2:
 +
* Display of information of affiliated vs. accredited privacy / proxy providers
 +
* Legal vs. natural persons
 +
* City field redaction
 +
* Data retention
 +
* Potential Purpose for ICANN’s Office of the Chief Technology Officer
 +
* Feasibility of unique contacts to have a uniform anonymized email address
 +
* Accuracy and WHOIS Accuracy Reporting System<ref name="2addendum" />
 +
 +
    
====Final Report====
 
====Final Report====
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
3,197

edits

Navigation menu