Line 573: |
Line 573: |
| | After [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/acharya-response-19feb15-en.pdf initially responding] that it needed to consult with the parties to the contract to get consensus on making the plan publicly available, staff provided an update that the [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/20150120-1-2015-02-24-en document was published in March] | | | After [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/acharya-response-19feb15-en.pdf initially responding] that it needed to consult with the parties to the contract to get consensus on making the plan publicly available, staff provided an update that the [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/20150120-1-2015-02-24-en document was published in March] |
| | Initial response cited 1, 2, 3, & 9 | | | Initial response cited 1, 2, 3, & 9 |
| + | | |
| + | |- |
| + | | 6 February 2015 |
| + | | Centre for Internet and Society |
| + | | Details of contract fees paid by the [[Regional Internet Registry|RIRs]] from 1999-2014, including a breakdown of contributions from each. |
| + | | [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-response-08mar15-en.pdf Pointed to published financial information], no other documents released |
| + | | No |
| + | | The response noted that NRO only published breakdowns of contributions by RIR for three years from 2003-2005 |
| + | |- |
| + | | 11 February 2015 |
| + | | Kin Sun |
| + | | Documents related to allegedly unauthorized transfer(s) of a domain name |
| + | | [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-13mar15-en.pdf Declined] |
| + | | 3 & 5 |
| + | | |
| + | |- |
| + | | 12 March 2015 |
| + | | [[James Gannon]] |
| + | | Disclosure of Root Zone KSK Operator Function Termination Plan specified in Section C.7.3 of the IANA Functions Contract between ICANN and the NTIA |
| + | | After [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150312-1-gannon-25mar15-en.pdf initially responding] that it needed to consult with the parties to the contract to get consensus on making the plan publicly available, staff provided an update that the [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/20150312-1-2015-03-25-en document was published in March] |
| + | | Initial response cited 1, 2, 3, 9, & 10 |
| + | | Essentially the same request as Guru Archarya, above |
| + | |- |
| + | | 14 March 2015 |
| + | | [[James Gannon]] |
| + | | Disclosure of Contingency and Continuity of Operations Plan as specified in Section C.7.2 in the IANA Functions contract between ICANN and the NTIA |
| + | | [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150314-1-gannon-25mar15-en.pdf Declined] |
| + | | 1, 3, 6, 10, & 11 |
| + | | Response notes that disclosure of the plan "could pose a threat to the stability and security of the Internet and domain name system," because the plan includes details of response & recovery planning in the event of targeted disruption of the Internet. |
| + | |- |
| + | | 7 April 2015 |
| + | | [[Paul Kane]] |
| + | | Workflow process documents with statistics for each stage of the IANA Root Zone Management Function |
| + | | After [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150407-1-kane-07may15-en.pdf initially responding] that staff would have to consult with all involved parties regarding publication of the information, staff later [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/20150407-1-2015-05-08-en updated the record] to note that the information had been published |
| + | | Initial response cited 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, & 11 |
| + | | |
| + | |- |
| + | | 27 April 2015 |
| + | | James Bridle |
| + | | Documents relating to the delegation and operation of [[.io]], including correspondence between ICANN and the delegated authority |
| + | | [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150427-1-bridle-27may15-en.pdf Provided context] but did not produce documents |
| + | | 1, 2, 3, 9, & 10 |
| + | | [[.io]] is an [[Open Use ccTLD]] that was delegated by IANA in 1997, prior to the formation of ICANN, and using IANA's standard procedure for assigning operation of [[ccTLD]]s, as described in [[RFC 1591]] |
| + | |- |
| + | | 5 June 2015 |
| + | | [[Flip Petillion]] |
| + | | Information & documents regarding the data exposure issues in the new gTLD application and GDD portals that exposed the data of [[.hotel]] applicants and others. |
| + | | [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150605-1-petillion-05jul15-en.pdf Provided a narrative] of the data exposure incident as related through ICANN's public announcements and updates on the issue; did not produce new documents |
| + | | 2, 5, 6, 8, & 9 |
| | | | | |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
| ==References== | | ==References== |