Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 46: Line 46:  
#*[[ccNSO]]: [[ICANN Community]] needs to communicate informally with [[ICANN Board]] and each other to speed things up
 
#*[[ccNSO]]: [[ICANN Community]] needs to communicate informally with [[ICANN Board]] and each other to speed things up
 
#[[GPI]]:
 
#[[GPI]]:
 +
#*[[Avri Doria:]] is it useful, I don’t know. But it was necessary, especially for the Board. It gives a language, tools, a methodology that is reproducible. We’ve got to see if it’s sufficient to the task. The determination has to come from the bottom up but a whole new set of procedures did not need to be generated. The GPI is like what the [[PDP]] does, but for the board. It is not mandatory in general, but at the moment it is necessary for the SSAD and SUBPRO.
 
#*GPI offers Board a tool and methodology to formalize and systemize their reasoning when they determine whether an action is in the GPI
 
#*GPI offers Board a tool and methodology to formalize and systemize their reasoning when they determine whether an action is in the GPI
 
#*[https://www.lewisroca.com/people-Anne-Aikman-Scalese Anne Aikman-Scalese]: the Board has a fiduciary duty to act in the Global Public Interest within the scope of its Mission. Otherwise, there would be no reason for the ByLaws to contain provisions that allow it to override GAC Advice by a 60% vote or to override GNSO Policy advice by a 2/3 majority vote. The GPI goes beyond MSM policymaking.  
 
#*[https://www.lewisroca.com/people-Anne-Aikman-Scalese Anne Aikman-Scalese]: the Board has a fiduciary duty to act in the Global Public Interest within the scope of its Mission. Otherwise, there would be no reason for the ByLaws to contain provisions that allow it to override GAC Advice by a 60% vote or to override GNSO Policy advice by a 2/3 majority vote. The GPI goes beyond MSM policymaking.  
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
14,952

edits

Navigation menu