14,952
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 20:
Line 20: − + − + − + Line 57:
Line 57: − +
→Rise and Fall of New.net
[https://web.archive.org/web/20051124194236/http://www.new.net/about_us_partners.tp Many partners in the early 2000s] and some early adopters were: Atlanta, Excite@Home Corp, NetZero, Earthlink, Wannado <ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20060926113318/http://www.new.net/news_release_1.tp</ref> <ref>https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/hotbots07/tech/full_papers/provos/provos.pdf The Ghost In The Browser: Analysis of Web-based Malware (Niels Provos, Dean McNamee, Panayiotis Mavrommatis, Ke Wang and Nagendra Modadugu, Google, Inc.)</ref> <ref>https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.97.2832&rep=rep1&type=pdf Analysing Privacy-Invasive Software Using Computer Forensic Methods, Martin Boldt and Bengt Carlsson, Information Security: 12th International Conference, Page 210</ref>
[https://web.archive.org/web/20051124194236/http://www.new.net/about_us_partners.tp Many partners in the early 2000s] and some early adopters were: Atlanta, Excite@Home Corp, NetZero, Earthlink, Wannado <ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20060926113318/http://www.new.net/news_release_1.tp</ref> <ref>https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/hotbots07/tech/full_papers/provos/provos.pdf The Ghost In The Browser: Analysis of Web-based Malware (Niels Provos, Dean McNamee, Panayiotis Mavrommatis, Ke Wang and Nagendra Modadugu, Google, Inc.)</ref> <ref>https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.97.2832&rep=rep1&type=pdf Analysing Privacy-Invasive Software Using Computer Forensic Methods, Martin Boldt and Bengt Carlsson, Information Security: 12th International Conference, Page 210</ref>
=== Relatively positive press, good partner growth, and optimism from March 2001 to December 2003===
=== March 2001 - December 2003:Relatively positive press, good partner growth, and optimism ===
New.net enjoyed relatively positive press, good partner growth, and optimism from March 2001 to December 2003 even as ICANN downplayed new.net’s potential.
New.net enjoyed relatively positive press, good partner growth, and optimism from March 2001 to December 2003 even as ICANN downplayed new.net’s potential.
* March 2001, Vint Cerf opines, "This idea -- it's a trick, really -- is something that other people have tried before, and it didn't ignite into any large business outcome," <ref>https://www.wired.com/2001/03/icann-tld-threat-what-threat/</ref>
* Early March 2001, Vint Cerf opines, "This idea -- it's a trick, really -- is something that other people have tried before, and it didn't ignite into any large business outcome," <ref>https://www.wired.com/2001/03/icann-tld-threat-what-threat/</ref>
March 5, 2001: from the ''Wall Street Journal'' the article, “Start-Up Will Sell Web Addresses To Bypass Internet Bureaucracy”, by Don Clark, stated, “Investor Bill Gross is planning one of the most ambitious attempts to bypass the bureaucracy that assigns Internet names.” <ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20060926113318/http://www.new.net/news_release_1.tp</ref>
* March 5, 2001: from the ''Wall Street Journal'' the article, “Start-Up Will Sell Web Addresses To Bypass Internet Bureaucracy”, by Don Clark, stated, “Investor Bill Gross is planning one of the most ambitious attempts to bypass the bureaucracy that assigns Internet names.” <ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20060926113318/http://www.new.net/news_release_1.tp</ref>
* May 28, 2001, ICANN does a PSA on why there needs to be a unique root<ref>https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/stockholm/unique-root-draft.htm, https://www.icann.org/resources/unthemed-pages/schecter-letter-to-icann-2001-07-16-en</ref>
* May 28, 2001, ICANN does a PSA on why there needs to be a unique root<ref>https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/stockholm/unique-root-draft.htm, https://www.icann.org/resources/unthemed-pages/schecter-letter-to-icann-2001-07-16-en</ref>
* On May 31, 2001, New.net sends a proposal to ICANN suggesting it adopt a hybrid Market/Consensus Approach to allow more competition, comparing it to browser competition <ref>https://archive.icann.org/en/icp/icp-3-background/new.net-paper-31may01.pdf</ref>
* On May 31, 2001, New.net sends a proposal to ICANN suggesting it adopt a hybrid Market/Consensus Approach to allow more competition, comparing it to browser competition <ref>https://archive.icann.org/en/icp/icp-3-background/new.net-paper-31may01.pdf</ref>
* from July 10, 2011, to May 12, 2012, New.net sits unchanged until the Internet Archive’s last capture of new.net’s main page.
* from July 10, 2011, to May 12, 2012, New.net sits unchanged until the Internet Archive’s last capture of new.net’s main page.
* March 29, 2012, ICANN closes the New gTLD Application period
* March 29, 2012, ICANN closes the New gTLD Application period
* June 13, 2012, ICANN hosts the New gTLD Reveal Day
* June 13, 2012, ICANN hosts the New gTLD Reveal Day
==References==
==References==
[[Category:Alternative Roots]]
[[Category:Alternative Roots]]