Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 35: Line 35:  
* Do the steps and the deliverables outline the scope of work for the Pilot Holistic Review?
 
* Do the steps and the deliverables outline the scope of work for the Pilot Holistic Review?
 
* Do the steps and the deliverables explain how Supporting Organizations, Advisory Committees, the Nominating Committee, and constituents will participate in establishing a Holistic Review Program?
 
* Do the steps and the deliverables explain how Supporting Organizations, Advisory Committees, the Nominating Committee, and constituents will participate in establishing a Holistic Review Program?
 +
====Responses====
 +
OF the responses, three submissions supported the drafted ToR but requested clarifications (VS, ALAC, AFNIC). Nine submissions raised concerns with the ToR (AP, SSAC, ccNSO Council, BC, RySG, RrSG, GAC, CCWP-HR, IPC). Concerns included: lack of clarity of the scope, identified dependencies, and independent examination within the Holistic Review and the community’s inability to support the potentially heavy Pilot Holistic Review workload.<ref>[https://itp.cdn.icann.org/en/files/specific-reviews/summary-report-pilot-holistic-review-draft-terms-reference-12-12-2022-en.pdf Summary Report of Holistic Review ToR Public Comments, ICANN]</ref>
 +
 +
    
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
14,952

edits

Navigation menu