9,082
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: − + Line 23:
Line 23: − + + + + + + + + + + + + + + − + + + +
no edit summary
| revenue =
| revenue =
| website = [http://www.namesatwork.com/ names@work]
| website = [http://www.namesatwork.com/ names@work]
| blog = [http://www.namesatwork.com/blog/ Minds+Machines]
| blog = [http://www.namesatwork.com/blog/ Names@work blog]
| facebook =
| facebook =
| linkedin =
| linkedin =
}}
}}
'''Names@Work.com''' is a domain name consulting firm which was founded by Antony Van Couvering in 2005. The company is based in New York City, with associate offices in Toronto, London and Seattle.<ref>[http://www.namesatwork.com/about namesatwork.com]</ref>
'''Names@Work.com''' is a general web consulting firm which was founded by Antony Van Couvering in 2005. The company is based in New York City, with associate offices in Toronto, London and Seattle.<ref>[http://www.namesatwork.com/about namesatwork.com]</ref>
==Services==
The company concentrates on helping its clients acquire new top-level domains through the [[ICANN]] process by helping its clients to:<ref>[http://www.namesatwork.com/about namesatwork.com]</ref>
# put together a winning business plan
# identify revenue opportunities
# raise money from knowledgeable investors
# complete the ICANN application
# publish policies that work for your TLD
# find and engage a reliable registry operator
# find and engage a reliable auction provider
# plan and publicize the Sunrise Period to trademark holders
# engage your community and get public support
# secure political backing when required
# deal with competition and contention
==References==
==Names@Work and Icann==
The founder of the company, Antony Van Couvering is an active participant of [[ICANN]] activities. In 2008, Couvering commented on the Independent Reviewer's Report which was written by the Boston Consulting Group and Colin Carter & Associates which proposed to reconstitute the ICANN Board. According to Couvering,the entire report was worthless and ICANN should ignore it.Couvering pointed out, "The mind-set, bias, and basic understanding of the authors came from the corporate world, and whether they thought they could set that aside and make a fair assessment, very obviously they could not. The entire document is shot through with unwarranted assumptions, riddled with unsubstantiated opinions, and as a whole has been rendered useful only for demonstrations on how to recycle wastepaper by the authors’ evident ignorance of ICANN’s history or its values."<ref>[http://www.namesatwork.com/blog/2008/12/12/toxic-proposal-to-reconstitute-icanns-board Toxic Proposal to reconstitute Icann Board]</ref>
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Companies]]
[[Category:Companies]]