27,652
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 347:
Line 347: + +
no edit summary
cool, i was only looking at their website, and didn't notice a camelcase version.. also, there website is full of typos so it makes sense that they wouldn't be consistent.
cool, i was only looking at their website, and didn't notice a camelcase version.. also, there website is full of typos so it makes sense that they wouldn't be consistent.
failed link, not sure I can dig it up now, but apparently it was interesting. OH! it was that court claiming it had jurisdiction over ICANN, related to a UDRP case. I'll look for it again. [[User:Andrew|Andrew]]