27,652
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 38:
Line 38: − + − + − +
→ICANN Involvement
==ICANN Involvement==
==ICANN Involvement==
NetNames is active in participating in the different activities of the [[ICANN|Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers]]. Some of its latest participation were during ICANN's global consultation outreach for the the implementation of the new [[gTLD]] program held in London on July 15, 2009.<ref>[http://www.netnames.co.uk/resources/news/2009/netnames-participates-icanns-london-outreach-event NetNames participates at ICANN's London outreach event]</ref> The company also provided comments on the issue of Trademark Protection for new gTLDs in response to the [[IRT]] Report. The following comments were submitted to the ICANN forum:<ref>[http://forum.icann.org/lists/irt-draft-report/pdfUM2QniWBC3.pdf A response to the 24 April 2009 draft output from ICANN’s IRT]</ref>
NetNames is active in [[ICANN]]. Some of its latest participation was during ICANN's global consultation outreach for the the implementation of the [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD program]] held in London on July 15, 2009.<ref>[http://www.netnames.co.uk/resources/news/2009/netnames-participates-icanns-london-outreach-event NetNames participates at ICANN's London outreach event]</ref> The company also provided comments on the issue of Trademark Protection for new gTLDs in response to the [[IRT]] Report. The following comments were submitted to the ICANN forum:<ref>[http://forum.icann.org/lists/irt-draft-report/pdfUM2QniWBC3.pdf A response to the 24 April 2009 draft output from ICANN’s IRT]</ref>
* NetNames recognized the importance of the [[IP Clearinghouse]] to protect the rights of new [[TLD]]s and it agreed to the idea that the services should be technically state-of-the-art and support open communication standards. The company suggested that the IP Clearinghouse should be developed through an open competition among service providers.
* NetNames recognized the importance of the [[IP Clearinghouse]] to protect the rights of new [[TLD]]s and it agreed to the idea that the services should be technically state-of-the-art and support open communication standards. The company suggested that the IP Clearinghouse should be developed through an open competition among service providers.
* The proposal regarding the Globally Protected Marks List needs a careful evaluation.
* The proposal regarding the Globally Protected Marks List needs a careful evaluation.
* The IP Claims service is valuable.
* The IP Claims service is valuable.
* NetNames accepted that the Uniform Rapid Suspension System ([[URS]]) is a feasible concept for a low-cost and rapid method to address problems on infringing domain registrations.
* NetNames accepted that the [[URS|Uniform Rapid Suspension System]] (URS) is a feasible concept for a low-cost and rapid method to address problems on infringing domain registrations.
* The post delegation dispute resolution mechanism is not necessary.
* The post delegation dispute resolution mechanism is not necessary.
* The company supported the IRT recommendation regarding the specific requirements for [[Whois]] and the expansion for the analysis of string confusion.
* The company supported the [[IRT]] recommendation regarding the specific requirements for [[Whois]] and the expansion for the analysis of string confusion.
==References==
==References==