Changes

96 bytes added ,  11 years ago
no edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:  
|keypeople  =  
 
|keypeople  =  
 
}}
 
}}
'''.eco''' is a proposed [[gTLD]] in [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD program]]. At one time, there were multiple companies publicly interested in applying to manage a .eco TLD. The TLD is aimed at drawing attention to ecological causes, organizations, and other entities associating themselves with positive ecological developments.
+
'''.eco''' is a proposed [[gTLD]] in [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD program]]. The TLD is aimed at drawing attention to ecological causes, organizations, and other entities associating themselves with positive ecological developments.
 +
==Current Applicants==
 +
# [[Top Level Domain Holdings Ltd.]], one of 68 applications submitted by the company on its own behalf.
 +
# [[Planet Dot Eco, LLC]]
 +
# [[Donuts]] (Little Birch, LLC), one of 307 TLDs submitted by the company.
 +
# [[Big Room Inc.]]
   −
One public applicant, [[Big Room Inc.]], has announced a partnership with [[Afilias]] for their back-end and technical needs, and also announced that they intend to apply for the TLD as a [[Community gTLD]]. They have been working with a Council of 13 environmental groups on a Policy Charter for .ECO since 2009. The Council is currently chaired by the World Wildlife Federation (WWF) International and Akatu Institute (Brazil). Other members include Greenpeace, Green Cross International, and Green Belt Movement International. In addition, over 20 other environmental groups, including 350.org, Ocean Conservancy, Amazon Watch and others from China, India, Europe and North America have endorsed the Council and Big Room's .ECO application. The goal is to demonstrate the requisite community support and define a purpose and policies for .ECO for the greater good.<ref>[http://news.dot-nxt.com/2012/02/06/dot-eco-interview Dot ECO Interview, News.Dot-Nxt.com]</ref>
+
==Application Details==
 +
===Big Room, Inc.===
 +
One public applicant, [[Big Room Inc.]], announced a partnership with [[Afilias]] for their back-end and technical needs, and also announced that they intend to apply for the TLD as a [[Community gTLD]]. They have been working with a Council of 13 environmental groups on a Policy Charter for .ECO since 2009. The Council is currently chaired by the World Wildlife Federation (WWF) International and Akatu Institute (Brazil). Other members include Greenpeace, Green Cross International, and Green Belt Movement International. In addition, over 20 other environmental groups, including 350.org, Ocean Conservancy, Amazon Watch and others. The goal is to demonstrate the requisite community support and define a purpose and policies for .ECO for the greater good.<ref>[http://news.dot-nxt.com/2012/02/06/dot-eco-interview Dot ECO Interview, News.Dot-Nxt.com]</ref>
   −
===Contention===
+
==Early Contention==
 
.eco was identified as a contentious TLD early on, with the main parties being [[Big Room Inc.]], and [[Dot Eco LLC.]]. Dot Eco LLC was aligned with former Vice-President of the USA, [[Al Gore]], and the Alliance for Climate Protection, the Sierra Club and Surfrider Foundation. Big Room Inc. was, at that time, largely associated with Mikhail Gorbachev, the Russian ex-president, Green Cross International and WWF International. In August 2009, Dot Eco LLC released a 'green paper' critiquing Big Room Inc.'s approach. Big Room did not respond to the critique other than that it was  'unfortunate'. <ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8199802.stm Green Domain Sparks War of Words, BBCNews.com]</ref>
 
.eco was identified as a contentious TLD early on, with the main parties being [[Big Room Inc.]], and [[Dot Eco LLC.]]. Dot Eco LLC was aligned with former Vice-President of the USA, [[Al Gore]], and the Alliance for Climate Protection, the Sierra Club and Surfrider Foundation. Big Room Inc. was, at that time, largely associated with Mikhail Gorbachev, the Russian ex-president, Green Cross International and WWF International. In August 2009, Dot Eco LLC released a 'green paper' critiquing Big Room Inc.'s approach. Big Room did not respond to the critique other than that it was  'unfortunate'. <ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8199802.stm Green Domain Sparks War of Words, BBCNews.com]</ref>