Changes

On October 12, 2010, the BGC determined that the allegations of the coalition has no merit and cited the following reasons:<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/tap/2010-12-10+Response+to+Reconsideration+Request+10-2 2010-12-10 Response to Reconsideration Request 10-2]</ref>

On October 12, 2010, the BGC determined that the allegations of the coalition has no merit and cited the following reasons:<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/tap/2010-12-10+Response+to+Reconsideration+Request+10-2 2010-12-10 Response to Reconsideration Request 10-2]</ref>

* The concerns of the coalition regarding the potential violation of the .jobs charter regarding the implementation of the Phase Allocation Program is not a proper ground for the ICANN Board to reconsider its decision.

* The concern of the coalition regarding the potential violation of the .jobs charter regarding the implementation of the Phase Allocation Program is not proper ground for the ICANN Board to reconsider its decision.

* The ICANN Board did not fail to consider material information available at the time of action.

* The ICANN Board did not fail to consider material information available at the time of action.

In addition, the BGC recommended the ICANN Board to closely monitor Employ Media's compliance with the charter, to direct the [[ICANN CEO]] to create a briefing paper for the GNSO to consider the issue and evaluate if a policy development process ([[PDP]]) is necessary.

In addition, the BGC recommended the ICANN Board to closely monitor Employ Media's compliance with the charter, to direct the [[ICANN CEO]] to create a briefing paper for the [[GNSO]] to consider the issue and evaluate if a [[PDP|policy development process]] (PDP) is necessary.

During the ICANN meeting in Colombia on December 9, 2010, the ICANN Board's BGC refused to change its decision in August regarding the approval of the.jobs Phased Allocation Program despite the persistent petition from .JOBS Charter Coalition. However, the BGC recommended that "the Board direct the CEO, and General Counsel and Secretary, to ensure that ICANN’s Contractual Compliance Department closely monitor Employ Media’s compliance with its Charter. ICANN's decision allowed Employ Media continue its RFP process, to auction and allocate premium domain names to its partners but not to expand beyond the charter of the .jobs TLD.<ref>[http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/reconsideration/bgc-recommendation-09dec10-en.pdf Recommendation Of The Board Governance Committee, Reconsideration Request 10-2, 9 December 2010]</ref> <ref>[http://domainincite.com/did-jobs-win-or-lose-in-cartagena/ Did .jobs win or lose in Cartagena?]</ref>

During the ICANN meeting in Colombia on December 9, 2010, the ICANN Board's BGC refused to change its decision in August regarding the approval of the.jobs Phased Allocation Program despite the persistent pressure from the .JOBS Charter Coalition. However, the BGC recommended that "the Board direct the CEO, and General Counsel and Secretary, to ensure that ICANN’s Contractual Compliance Department closely monitor Employ Media’s compliance with its Charter. ICANN's decision allowed Employ Media to continue its RFP process, to auction and allocate premium domain names to its partners but not to expand beyond the charter of the .jobs TLD.<ref>[http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/reconsideration/bgc-recommendation-09dec10-en.pdf Recommendation Of The Board Governance Committee, Reconsideration Request 10-2, 9 December 2010]</ref><ref>[http://domainincite.com/did-jobs-win-or-lose-in-cartagena/ Did .jobs win or lose in Cartagena?]</ref>

==Universe.Jobs==

==Universe.Jobs==