Changes

==Comments Against Digital Archery==

==Comments Against Digital Archery==

In June 2012, Kinderis expressed its opposition to the implementation of ICANN's digital archery and he wants  the internet governing body to get rid of its entire batching mechanism. According to him, digital archery is a solution to a problem that is uncertain. Kinderis suggested for ICANN to include all gTLD applications in a single batch and go through the initial evaluation phase, which would take between 10-12 months instead. According to him, the idea is supported by some of the large registry service providers. He said, ''"We’ve talked to some of the big registries and they’re waiting for us to put this out so they can come to the party and support it.If they extended initial evaluation to 12 months, I think that would have the support of the ICANN community"'' <ref>[http://domainincite.com/9239-revolt-brewing-over-digital-archery Revolt brewing over digital archery]</ref>

In June 2012, Kinderis expressed ARI's opposition to the implementation of ICANN's [[Digital Archery|digital archery program]], and called on ICANN to abandon it entirely as a solution to [[batching]]. According to him, digital archery is a solution to a problem that is uncertain. Kinderis suggested that ICANN include all gTLD applications in a single batch and go through the initial evaluation phase in one 12 month period. He said that his idea is supported by some of the large registry service providers, saying ''"We’ve talked to some of the big registries and they’re waiting for us to put this out so they can come to the party and support it.If they extended initial evaluation to 12 months, I think that would have the support of the ICANN community"'' <ref>[http://domainincite.com/9239-revolt-brewing-over-digital-archery Revolt brewing over digital archery]</ref>

In a letter to ICANN, the company expressed its support to [[Melbourne IT]]'s position against the digital archery  and requested ICANN to reconsider its proposed batching timeline and to examine the alternative solutions presented by the ICANN community during the ICANN meeting in Prague. <ref>[http://domainincite.com/docs/ARI-Letter-to-ICANN-Board-New-gTLD-Program-2012-06-01.pdf ARI Registry Services Letter to ICANN on Digital Archery and Batching Processes]</ref>

In a letter to ICANN, the company expressed its support of [[Melbourne IT]]'s position against digital archery  and requested ICANN to reconsider its proposed batching timeline and to examine alternative solutions presented by the ICANN community during the ICANN meeting in Prague.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/docs/ARI-Letter-to-ICANN-Board-New-gTLD-Program-2012-06-01.pdf ARI Registry Services Letter to ICANN on Digital Archery and Batching Processes]</ref>

Kinderis sent a follow-up letter to ICANN regarding the issue and reiterated that it is not supported by applicants and batching will only "increase the likelihood of confusion, frustration and uncertainty" for them. He pointed out that applicants want a level playing field for everyone to move forward at an equal rate and he is positive that the ICANN community will support an extension of the initial evaluation process for a reasonable time (12 months) instead of the proposed 5-7 months initial evaluation per batch. <ref>[http://domainincite.com/docs/ARI-Letter-to-ICANN-Board-New-gTLD-Program-2012-06-06.pdf Second Letter to ICANN on Digital Archery and Batching Processes]</ref>

Mr. Kinderis sent a follow-up letter to ICANN regarding the issue and reiterated that it is not supported by applicants and that batching will only "increase the likelihood of confusion, frustration and uncertainty" for them. He pointed out that applicants want a level playing field for everyone to move forward at an equal rate and he is positive that the ICANN community will support an extension of the initial evaluation process for a reasonable time (12 months) instead of the proposed 5-7 months initial evaluation per batch.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/docs/ARI-Letter-to-ICANN-Board-New-gTLD-Program-2012-06-06.pdf Second Letter to ICANN on Digital Archery and Batching Processes]</ref>

==References==

==References==