6,681
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 47:
Line 47: + + +
no edit summary
OUR PROTECTIONS
OUR PROTECTIONS
Donuts has consulted with and evaluated the ideas of international law enforcement, consumer privacy advocacy organizations, intellectual property interests and other Internet industry groups to create a set of protections that far exceed those in existing TLDs, and bring to the Internet namespace nearly two dozen new rights and protection mechanisms to raise user safety and protection to a new level."<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/754 Application Download, gTLDresult.ICANN.org] Retrieved 22 Feb 2013</ref>
Donuts has consulted with and evaluated the ideas of international law enforcement, consumer privacy advocacy organizations, intellectual property interests and other Internet industry groups to create a set of protections that far exceed those in existing TLDs, and bring to the Internet namespace nearly two dozen new rights and protection mechanisms to raise user safety and protection to a new level."<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/754 Application Download, gTLDresult.ICANN.org] Retrieved 22 Feb 2013</ref>
==String Confusion Objection==
[[Google]] submitted an objection to the International Centre for Dispute Resolution ([[ICDR]]), saying that the .games and [[.game]] strings would confuse Internet users. Panelist [[Earl Cherniak]] ruled on the side of Google. This decision will put [[Donuts]], the sole applicant for .games, into a contention set with [[Google]] and others for the [[.game]] gTLD.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2013/09/24/google-beats-donuts-in-games-top-level-domain-name-dispute/ Google beats Donuts in .games gTLD Dispute, Domain Name Wire] Retrieved 25 Sept 2013</ref>
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}