27,652
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: + + +
→NOTOC
==NOTOC==
==NOTOC==
I don't see any reason to get rid of the table in general, Even on short articles when it is inserted (when more than 2 sections are created, I believe) it seems to make the article look more complete. I like it aesthetically, but I'll be sure to ask Ray about it in the future. Thanks for the curiosity! [[User:Andrew|Andrew]]
I don't see any reason to get rid of the table in general, Even on short articles when it is inserted (when more than 2 sections are created, I believe) it seems to make the article look more complete. I like it aesthetically, but I'll be sure to ask Ray about it in the future. Thanks for the curiosity! [[User:Andrew|Andrew]]
We've come to the conclusion that the table of contents should be removed on shorter articles. It makes sense to help navigate big articles but since it is automatically created after a few sections are created it is often unnecessary. So, I think it would make sense to have it on your [[DNSSEC]] article but it should be removed on articles the size of the [[TLD]] article. Good instinct! [[User:Andrew|Andrew]]
==References Example==
==References Example==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}