Changes

If Registry Operator requires the use of functionality outside the base EPP RFCs, pursuant to section 1.2 of Specification 6 of your registry agreement, Registry Operator must document EPP extensions in Internet-Draft format, i.e., plain text (see, http://www.rfc-editor.org/formatting.html) following the guidelines described in RFC 3735. If that is the case, please provide the relevant documentation of all the EPP Objects and Extensions as a SEPARATE attachment to this customer portal case.

If Registry Operator requires the use of functionality outside the base EPP RFCs, pursuant to section 1.2 of Specification 6 of your registry agreement, Registry Operator must document EPP extensions in Internet-Draft format, i.e., plain text (see, http://www.rfc-editor.org/formatting.html) following the guidelines described in RFC 3735. If that is the case, please provide the relevant documentation of all the EPP Objects and Extensions as a SEPARATE attachment to this customer portal case.

Each EPP extension should be in a separate text file named using the following convention: <tld>_<registry-operator>_epp-extension_<extension-name>_v<dd>.txt, for example, xn--91btfiec_acme-inc_epp-extension_auctions_v01.txt

Each EPP extension should be in a separate text file named using the following convention: <nowiki><tld>_<registry-operator>_epp-extension_<extension-name>_v<dd>.txt, for example, xn--91btfiec_acme-inc_epp-extension_auctions_v01.txt</nowiki>

37. Are you going to use draft-tan-epp-launchphase in order to comply with the RPM requirements of new gTLDs (Y/N)?:

37. Are you going to use draft-tan-epp-launchphase in order to comply with the RPM requirements of new gTLDs (Y/N)?: