6,681
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 30:
Line 30: + + +
→Objection & PIC
India's warning notes that the applicant needs stricter measures of security to ensure the validity of its services and registrants, and must demonstrate that it intends to follow India's codified Halal laws.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Halal-IN-60793.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353469431000 Halal India, GACweb.ICANN.org] Retrieved 26 Nov 2012</ref>
India's warning notes that the applicant needs stricter measures of security to ensure the validity of its services and registrants, and must demonstrate that it intends to follow India's codified Halal laws.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Halal-IN-60793.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353469431000 Halal India, GACweb.ICANN.org] Retrieved 26 Nov 2012</ref>
Since the [[GAC]] provided individual government's advice on this TLD and not a [[GAC]] consensus objection, [[ICANN Board]] Chair [[Steve Crocker]] asked the GAC to provide further consensus advice on the application. However, after the conclusion of [[ICANN 48]] in Buenos Aires, GAC Chair [[Heather Dryden]] wrote to Mr. Crocker informing him that the GAC would provide no further advice on the .islam and [[.halal]] strings. This means that the ICANN Board will now have to decide the fate of the application without strong consensus advice from GAC.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/15259-icann-will-have-to-make-a-call-on-islam ICANN will have to make a call on .islam, DomainIncite] Retrieved 09 Dec 2013</ref>
===Community Objection===
===Community Objection===
The Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of the United Arab emirates The Gulf Cooperation Council filed a [[Community Objection|community objection]] against this application.<ref>[http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/arbitration-and-adr/expertise/icann-new-gtld-dispute-resolution/pending-cases/ Pending Cases, ICC.ICANN.org]Retrieved 15 May 2013</ref> However, the applicant prevailed and the objection was dismissed by the [[ICC]]. The determination was published on 4 November 2013.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/odr/determination Objection Determinations, ICANN.org] Retrieved 05 Nov 2013</ref>
The Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of the United Arab emirates The Gulf Cooperation Council filed a [[Community Objection|community objection]] against this application.<ref>[http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/arbitration-and-adr/expertise/icann-new-gtld-dispute-resolution/pending-cases/ Pending Cases, ICC.ICANN.org]Retrieved 15 May 2013</ref> However, the applicant prevailed and the objection was dismissed by the [[ICC]]. The determination was published on 4 November 2013.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/odr/determination Objection Determinations, ICANN.org] Retrieved 05 Nov 2013</ref>