Line 12: |
Line 12: |
| |category = [[:Category: Sport New gTLDs|Sport]] | | |category = [[:Category: Sport New gTLDs|Sport]] |
| |community = | | |community = |
− | |priority = 627 - [[Famous Four Media]] (dot Tennis Limited)<br>981 - [[.TENNIS AUSTRALIA LTD]]<br>1326 - [[Washington Team Tennis, LLC]]<br>1417 - [[Donuts]] (Cotton Bloom, LLC) | + | |priority = <s>627 - [[Famous Four Media]] (dot Tennis Limited)<br>981 - [[.TENNIS AUSTRALIA LTD]]<br>1326 - [[Washington Team Tennis, LLC]]<br></s>1417 - [[Donuts]] (Cotton Bloom, LLC) |
| |keypeople = | | |keypeople = |
| }} | | }} |
| '''.tennis''' is a proposed [[gTLD]] in [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD program]]. | | '''.tennis''' is a proposed [[gTLD]] in [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD program]]. |
− | ==Current Applicants== | + | |
| + | ==Current Applicant== |
| + | #[[Donuts]] (Cotton Bloom, LLC) - This applicant submitted a [[PIC|Public Interest Commitment]], which can be downloaded [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/578 here]. |
| + | |
| + | ====Private Auction==== |
| + | A [[private auction]] resolved the contention set for this string in November 2014, with Donuts winning the rights for the gTLD.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/17622-battles-for-chat-style-tennis-bingo-and-sas-are-over Battles for .chat, .style, .tennis, .bingo, and .sas Are Over] ''By Kevin Murphy, DomainIncite.com''; Retrieved 13 Nov 2014</ref> |
| + | |
| + | ==Previous Applicants=== |
| #[[.TENNIS AUSTRALIA LTD]] | | #[[.TENNIS AUSTRALIA LTD]] |
− | #[[Donuts]] (Cotton Bloom, LLC) - This applicant submitted a [[PIC|Public Interest Commitment]], which can be downloaded [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/578 here].
| |
| #[[Famous Four Media]] (dot Tennis Limited) | | #[[Famous Four Media]] (dot Tennis Limited) |
| #[[Washington Team Tennis, LLC]] <ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus Tennis Status, ICANN.org]</ref> | | #[[Washington Team Tennis, LLC]] <ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus Tennis Status, ICANN.org]</ref> |
| | | |
− | ==.TENNIS AUSTRALIA LTD== | + | ===.TENNIS AUSTRALIA LTD=== |
| [[.TENNIS AUSTRALIA LTD]]'s application was issued a [[GAC]] Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, [[Heather Dryden]]. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the [[ICANN Board]] that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/gac-early-warning GAC Early Warning, NewgTLDS.ICANN.org] Retrieved 25 Nov 2012</ref> | | [[.TENNIS AUSTRALIA LTD]]'s application was issued a [[GAC]] Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, [[Heather Dryden]]. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the [[ICANN Board]] that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/gac-early-warning GAC Early Warning, NewgTLDS.ICANN.org] Retrieved 25 Nov 2012</ref> |
| | | |
Line 31: |
Line 37: |
| Current language in its application does not seem to leave room for any registration of the [[.tennis]] TLD outside of Australia.<ref>Application 1-1723-69677</ref> | | Current language in its application does not seem to leave room for any registration of the [[.tennis]] TLD outside of Australia.<ref>Application 1-1723-69677</ref> |
| | | |
− | ===CPE Result=== | + | ====CPE Result==== |
| In March 2014 a [[Community Priority Evaluation]] (CPE) panel decided that the applicant would not prevail as a community applicant, giving them a 11 out of 16 possible points (14 are needed to pass). Thus the applicant will now have to resolve the contention set through other means such as a [[Private auction|Private]] or ICANN auction.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/cpe#invitations CPE Status] ''ICANN.org''; Retrieved 13 June 2014</ref> | | In March 2014 a [[Community Priority Evaluation]] (CPE) panel decided that the applicant would not prevail as a community applicant, giving them a 11 out of 16 possible points (14 are needed to pass). Thus the applicant will now have to resolve the contention set through other means such as a [[Private auction|Private]] or ICANN auction.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/cpe#invitations CPE Status] ''ICANN.org''; Retrieved 13 June 2014</ref> |
| | | |