Difference between revisions of "ICANN 67"

From ICANNWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 26: Line 26:
 
# [[Global Public Interest]] topics such as [[Public Interest Commitments|Mandatory Public Interest Commitments]] (PICs), Voluntary Public Interest Commitments, tentatively called Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs), [[DNS Abuse]], and Verified TLDs; and
 
# [[Global Public Interest]] topics such as [[Public Interest Commitments|Mandatory Public Interest Commitments]] (PICs), Voluntary Public Interest Commitments, tentatively called Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs), [[DNS Abuse]], and Verified TLDs; and
 
# Draft recommendations on GAC Advice and GAC Early Warning.
 
# Draft recommendations on GAC Advice and GAC Early Warning.
 +
* The Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs PDP working group reviewed the draft Phase 1 Initial Report, with 26 preliminary
 +
recommendations, 17 specific community questions, and 24 proposals. The working group deliberated RPM-related recommendations of the Temporary
 +
Specification team and the Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Review Team.
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
  
 
[[Category:ICANN Meetings]]
 
[[Category:ICANN Meetings]]

Revision as of 15:22, 4 October 2021

ICANN67logo.PNG
Dates: March 7-12, 2020
Location: Virtual
Website: ICANN 67 (registration required)


ICANN 67 was held as a virtual community forum in March 2020. It was the first meeting to be fully virtual as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The original host was Cancun, and the time zone for meeting scheduling was Eastern Standard Time.

Sessions[edit | edit source]

GNSO[edit | edit source]

The GNSO held 19 sessions including GNSO policy development process (PDP) working group meetings, Stakeholder Group and Constituency work meetings, and a GNSO Council meeting.

  • The EPDP Team finalized its draft recommendations on Priority 2 topics:
  1. the display of information of affiliated vs. accredited privacy/proxy providers,
  2. data retention,
  3. city field redaction, and
  4. feasibility of unique contacts to have a uniform anonymized email address. The EPDP Team included these recommendations in its Addendum

on Priority 2 items for Public Comment.[1]

  1. whether to allow closed generic top-level domains;
  2. Global Public Interest topics such as Mandatory Public Interest Commitments (PICs), Voluntary Public Interest Commitments, tentatively called Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs), DNS Abuse, and Verified TLDs; and
  3. Draft recommendations on GAC Advice and GAC Early Warning.
  • The Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs PDP working group reviewed the draft Phase 1 Initial Report, with 26 preliminary

recommendations, 17 specific community questions, and 24 proposals. The working group deliberated RPM-related recommendations of the Temporary Specification team and the Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Review Team.

References[edit | edit source]