Global Public Interest: Difference between revisions
m added Category:Concepts using HotCat |
|||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
==GPI Toolkit== | ==GPI Toolkit== | ||
[[File:GPI Framework Process.jpg|655px|thumbnail|right|GPI Framework (from GPI Toolkit, ICANN.org)]]The GPI Toolkit, which is shepherded by [[Avri Doria]] in its pilot version application for the [[SSAD]] and [[SUBPRO]] [[ODP]]s, is meant to systematically assess the determination of GPI when considering new actions.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/prjxplrpublicint/GPI+Toolkit GPI Toolkit, ICANN Community]</ref> | [[File:GPI Framework Process.jpg|655px|thumbnail|right|GPI Framework (from GPI Toolkit, ICANN.org)]]The GPI Toolkit, which is shepherded by [[Avri Doria]] in its pilot version application for the [[SSAD]] and [[SUBPRO]] [[ODP]]s, is meant to systematically assess the determination of GPI when considering new actions.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/prjxplrpublicint/GPI+Toolkit GPI Toolkit, ICANN Community]</ref> | ||
===Broad ICANN Category alignment with Public Interest Categories=== | |||
The prospective framework aligns ICANN's missions and core values with public interest categories.<ref>Plenary Session: The Global Public Interest Framework: Is it Useful?, ICANN 73</ref> | |||
# ICANN’s technical coordination: Does it help maintain a stable, secure, open, resilient, and interoperable Internet? | |||
# ICANN’s role in the DNS marketplace: Does it help the marketplace remain competitive, fair, and trusted? | |||
# Benefit to the Internet community: Is it Beneficial? | |||
# ICANN’s global multistakeholder community and policy development policies: Are they diverse, respectful, inclusive, innovative, transparent, open, and balanced? | |||
# ICANN’s policies and practices: Are they neutral, objective, responsive, accountable, sustainable, fair, and fiscally responsible? | |||
==References== | ==References== |