History of ROOT-SERVERS: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div style="text-align: justify;"> | <div style="text-align: justify;"> | ||
'''History of ROOT-SERVERS''' - A Journey from 4 nodes to 13 [[Root Server Operator|nodes]] at present. Based on the excerpt from “History of Root DNS Servers” by [[RSSAC]].<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rssac-023-04nov16-en.pdf RSSAC023]</ref><ref>[https://blog.gauravkansal.in/2022/02/history-of-root-servers.html Gaurav Kansal's Blog]</ref> | '''History of ROOT-SERVERS''' - A Journey from 4 nodes to 13 [[Root Server Operator|nodes]] at present. Based on the excerpt from “History of Root DNS Servers” by [[RSSAC]].<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rssac-023-04nov16-en.pdf RSSAC023]</ref><ref>[https://blog.gauravkansal.in/2022/02/history-of-root-servers.html History of Root Servers, Gaurav Kansal's Blog]</ref> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
==1.1 Period 1983-1986== | ==1.1 Period 1983-1986== | ||
<div style="text-align: justify;"> | <div style="text-align: justify;"> | ||
Before the development of the [[DNS]], information about hosts was assigned in a flat namespace format and name-to-address lookups were done using a table, which use to be available in all the hosts. Network Information Centre (NIC) at [[SRI International]], use to maintain this table and all hosts get the updated copy from SRI-NIC periodically. At that time, most of the hosts were at [[ARPANET]] (Advanced Research Project Agency Network) and [[DND]] (Defense Data Network), and managing the host records in a flat file wasn’t that tough. <ref>[https://marc.info/?l=namedroppers&m=95837667426588&w=2]</ref><ref>[https://www.donelan.com/dnstimeline.html DNS Timeline, Donelan]</ref> | Before the development of the [[DNS]], information about hosts was assigned in a flat namespace format and name-to-address lookups were done using a table, which use to be available in all the hosts. Network Information Centre (NIC) at [[SRI International]], use to maintain this table and all hosts get the updated copy from SRI-NIC periodically. At that time, most of the hosts were at [[ARPANET]] (Advanced Research Project Agency Network) and [[DND]] (Defense Data Network), and managing the host records in a flat file wasn’t that tough. <ref>[https://marc.info/?l=namedroppers&m=95837667426588&w=2 Marc.Info]</ref><ref>[https://www.donelan.com/dnstimeline.html DNS Timeline, Donelan]</ref> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
As the number of hosts were increasing so was the size of this flat file, and with the frequency of updates, a decentralized database need was felt. To address this problem, Mr. [[Jon Postel]] and Mr. [[Paul Mockapetris]] published a number of RFCs that laid down the design of DNS. | As the number of hosts were increasing so was the size of this flat file, and with the frequency of updates, a decentralized database need was felt. To address this problem, Mr. [[Jon Postel]] and Mr. [[Paul Mockapetris]] published a number of RFCs that laid down the design of DNS. | ||
<br/><br /> | <br/><br /> | ||
To test the DNS, Postel and Mockapetris set up the first root server in 1984 at the [[Information Science Institute]] (ISI) at the University of South California (USC). The domain name services were running on the software developed by Mockapetris, named JEEVES. In 1985, an additional root was added at ISI. | To test the DNS, [[Jon Postel|Postel]] and [[Paul Mockapetris|Mockapetris]] set up the first root server in 1984 at the [[Information Science Institute]] (ISI) at the University of South California (USC). The domain name services were running on the software developed by Mockapetris, named JEEVES. In 1985, an additional root was added at ISI. | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
An additional root server was placed at SRI International, as it was NIC for DDN and was handling the registration of hosts and maintenance of the hosts.txt file. | An additional root server was placed at SRI International, as it was NIC for DDN and was handling the registration of hosts and maintenance of the hosts.txt file. | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|SRI-NIC ||JEEVES ||SRI-International | |SRI-NIC ||JEEVES ||SRI-International | ||
|- | |- | ||
|ISIB | |ISIB ||JEEVES || Information Science Institute, USC | ||
|- | |- | ||
|ISIC || JEEVES ||Information Science Institute, USC | |ISIC || JEEVES ||Information Science Institute, USC | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
|} | |} | ||
By March 1987, SRI-NIC was named SRI-NIC.ARPA, ISIC was named C.ISI.EDU, BRL-AOS was named BRL-AOS.ARPA, and ISIA (previously ISIB) was named A.ISI.EDU. | By March 1987, SRI-NIC was named SRI-NIC.ARPA, ISIC was named C.ISI.EDU, BRL-AOS was named BRL-AOS.ARPA, and ISIA (previously ISIB) was named A.ISI.EDU. As the DNS was in the early stages of development, root name servers at ISI tended to change machines frequently. In November 1986, ISIB was retired, and replaced by another server named ISIA. In October 1987, ISIC (C.ISI.EDU) was retired as well. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
<div style="text-align: justify;"> | <div style="text-align: justify;"> | ||
In October 1986, at the Internet Engineering Task Force ([[IETF]]) 6 meeting, Doug Kingston from BRL convened a workshop called “Name Domains for MILNET.” The primary focus was to explore the transition of MILNET to use domain names. | In October 1986, at the Internet Engineering Task Force ([[IETF]]) 6 meeting, Doug Kingston from BRL convened a workshop called “Name Domains for MILNET.” The primary focus was to explore the transition of MILNET to use domain names. IETF 6 Proceedings: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/06.pdf. <br/> | ||
During the workshop and also in mailing list discussions afterward, Gunter Air Force Station was mentioned as a possible root server location because of its ability to serve MILNET. Eventually, in November 1987 GUNTER-ADAM (U.S. Air Force Networking Group) was added as a root server. | During the workshop and also in mailing list discussions afterward, Gunter Air Force Station was mentioned as a possible root server location because of its ability to serve MILNET. Eventually, in November 1987 GUNTER-ADAM (U.S. Air Force Networking Group) was added as a root server. | ||
<br/><br/> | <br/><br/> | ||
In 1986, the National Science Foundation Network (NSFNET) went online. Built as a "network of networks" and developed in phases, NSFNET connected supercomputer centers in the U.S. and a variety of regional research and education networks, extending the Internet’s reach throughout the United States. | In 1986, the National Science Foundation Network (NSFNET) went online. Built as a "network of networks" and developed in phases, NSFNET connected supercomputer centers in the U.S. and a variety of regional research and education networks, extending the Internet’s reach throughout the United States. | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
As NSFNet traffic and registrations grew, people became aware of some cases of poor DNS service due to the limited number and reach of root servers. To address this issue, in July 1987, at the IETF 7 meeting, the name domain planning working group held a one-hour session to discuss root servers<ref>[ | As NSFNet traffic and registrations grew, people became aware of some cases of poor DNS service due to the limited number and reach of root servers. To address this issue, in July 1987, at the IETF 7 meeting, the name domain planning working group held a one-hour session to discuss root servers. <ref>[http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/07.pdf. IETF 7 Proceedings]</ref>. The goal of the meeting was to select root servers that would provide improved service to the NSFNET. The participants discussed and chose three new name servers – | ||
* University of Maryland, largely because it was in a position to serve equally well the [[NSFNET]], ARPANET, MILNET and [[SURANET]]. | * University of Maryland, largely because it was in a position to serve equally well the [[NSFNET]], ARPANET, MILNET and [[SURANET]]. | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|+ List of Root Servers in November 1987<ref>[http://marc.info/?l=namedroppers&m=95837781927013&w=2]</ref> | |+ List of Root Servers in November 1987<ref>[http://marc.info/?l=namedroppers&m=95837781927013&w=2 Marc.Info]</ref> | ||
|- | |- | ||
!Name !!Software !!Organisation | !Name !!Software !!Organisation | ||
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
In November 1988, DDN implemented phase two of the MILNET Domain Name Implementation with DDN MGT Bulletin 42. As a result, SRI-NIC.ARPA was renamed to NIC.DDN.MIL, BRL-AOS.ARPA was renamed to AOS.BRL.MIL, and GUNTERADAM.ARPA was renamed to GUNTER-ADAM.AF.MIL. | In November 1988, DDN implemented phase two of the MILNET Domain Name Implementation with DDN MGT Bulletin 42. As a result, SRI-NIC.ARPA was renamed to NIC.DDN.MIL, BRL-AOS.ARPA was renamed to AOS.BRL.MIL, and GUNTERADAM.ARPA was renamed to GUNTER-ADAM.AF.MIL. | ||
Thus, by November 1990, there were seven root servers | Thus, by November 1990, there were seven root servers. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
==1.3 Period 1991 – ROOT DNS Outside North America== | ==1.3 Period 1991 – ROOT DNS Outside North America== | ||
<div style="text-align: justify;"> | <div style="text-align: justify;"> | ||
There was an increasing need to have one or more root name servers in Europe to reduce the dependency on the few, expensive and unstable Internet links to the U.S. The issue was a topic of discussion at RIPE 1 on 22 May 1989. <ref>[https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/ripe-meetings/ripe-1]</ref> | There was an increasing need to have one or more root name servers in Europe to reduce the dependency on the few, expensive and unstable Internet links to the U.S. The issue was a topic of discussion at RIPE 1 on 22 May 1989.<ref>[https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/ripe-meetings/ripe-1 RIPE 1]</ref> | ||
On 28 July 1991, the server NIC.NORDU.NET was added to the root zone and became the first non-U.S. root server. | On 28 July 1991, the server NIC.NORDU.NET was added to the root zone and became the first non-U.S. root server. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
==1.4 Period 1991-1992== | ==1.4 Period 1991-1992== | ||
<div style="text-align: justify;"> | <div style="text-align: justify;"> | ||
In 1991, the Defense Information Systems Agency awarded the NIC contract to Government Systems, Inc. (GSI), which in turn outsourced the contract to Network Solutions, Inc. (NSI). As a result, a few changes happened | In 1991, the Defense Information Systems Agency awarded the NIC contract to Government Systems, Inc. (GSI), which in turn outsourced the contract to Network Solutions, Inc. (NSI). As a result, a few changes happened: | ||
* NS.NIC.DDN.MIL ownership changes from SRI-International to Network Solutions, Inc. | * NS.NIC.DDN.MIL ownership changes from SRI-International to Network Solutions, Inc. | ||
| Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
==1.6 1995 – Renaming Root Servers to root-servers.net== | ==1.6 1995 – Renaming Root Servers to root-servers.net== | ||
<div style="text-align: justify;"> | <div style="text-align: justify;"> | ||
By April 1993, the number of root name servers had grown to an extent where the size of a root hints response was approaching the limit of 512 bytes. Bill Manning and Paul Vixie developed a plan to rename all root servers under the root-servers.net domain. This would allow the use of DNS label compression to fit all the names within 512 bytes. Postel (IANA) agreed with the plan and Mark Kosters began the renaming phases in 1995. | By April 1993, the number of root name servers had grown to an extent where the size of a root hints response was approaching the limit of 512 bytes. Bill Manning and Paul Vixie developed a plan to rename all root servers under the root-servers.net domain. In 1994, when ISC first began to run a root name server, the company name was Internet Software Consortium. it was later changed to Internet Systems Consortium. This would allow the use of DNS label compression to fit all the names within 512 bytes. Postel (IANA) agreed with the plan and Mark Kosters began the renaming phases in 1995. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
|NS.NASA.GOV ||E.root-servers.net ||NASA Ames Research Centre | |NS.NASA.GOV ||E.root-servers.net ||NASA Ames Research Centre | ||
|- | |- | ||
|NS.ISC.ORG ||F.root-server.net ||Internet Software Consortium | |NS.ISC.ORG ||F.root-server.net ||Internet Software Consortium | ||
|- | |- | ||
|NS.NIC.DDN.MIL ||G.root-server.net ||GSI (Operated by NSI) | |NS.NIC.DDN.MIL ||G.root-server.net ||GSI (Operated by NSI) | ||
|- | |- | ||
|AOS.ARL.ARMY.MIL || H.root-server.net || U.S. Army Research Lab | |AOS.ARL.ARMY.MIL || H.root-server.net || U.S. Army Research Lab | ||
|- | |- | ||
|NIC.NORDU.NET || I.root-server.net || NORDUnet | |NIC.NORDU.NET || I.root-server.net || NORDUnet | ||
| Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
==1.7 1997 – Adding J, K, L and M == | ==1.7 1997 – Adding J, K, L and M == | ||
<div style="text-align: justify;"> | <div style="text-align: justify;"> | ||
Until 1996, there were only 9 Root Servers and with the migration to root-servers.net, operators were able to take advantage of DNS label compression | Until 1996, there were only 9 Root Servers and with the migration to root-servers.net, operators were able to take advantage of DNS label compression. Domain name compression was introduced in RFC1035 as an optional protocol feature and later mandated by RFC1123. In this scheme, an entire domain name or a list of labels at the end of a domain name is replaced with a pointer to a prior occurrence of the same name in the same message, thus eliminating the repetition of domain names in a message and reducing the size of the message. In the case of responses to root server priming queries, the domain root-servers.net appears only once in the response, instead of 13 times (once for each root server). There was then room for four additional root servers to fit within a 512-byte DNS response. The limitation is specified in RFC 1035 because at the time there were networks that could not handle DNS packets larger than 512 bytes without fragmenting. Also, known firewall rules dropped DNS packets more than 512 bytes in size. | ||
In January 1997, servers J-Root, K-Root, L-Root and M-Root | |||
In January 1997, servers J-Root, K-Root, L-Root, and M-Root were added, serving the root zone exclusively. Postel (IANA) asked Network Solutions Inc. to set up two additional servers with the intention of moving them to suitable operators quickly thereafter. He kept two more servers at USC-ISI with the same intention. J-Root and K-Root were set up at Network Solutions on the U.S. East Coast, while L-Root and M-Root were at USC ISI on the U.S. West Coast. | |||
From interviews, it appears that Jon Postel developed and used a few simple criteria in selecting organizations to host these new servers: | From interviews, it appears that Jon Postel developed and used a few simple criteria in selecting organizations to host these new servers: | ||
| Line 167: | Line 168: | ||
* Commitment to send and respond to traffic without filtering. The operator must be able to answer every DNS query and send responses back unfiltered. | * Commitment to send and respond to traffic without filtering. The operator must be able to answer every DNS query and send responses back unfiltered. | ||
For the European region, a number of parties expressed their willingness to operate a second root name server. Jon Postel (IANA) encouraged all parties to seek consensus about the matter. After thorough discussion, there was consensus that the Réseaux IP Européens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) was the appropriate organization to operate the server because of its neutrality and technical expertise. In particular, the RIPE NCC was deemed able to change the server’s deployment following changes in Internet topology | For the European region, a number of parties expressed their willingness to operate a second root name server. Jon Postel (IANA) encouraged all parties to seek consensus about the matter. After thorough discussion, there was consensus that the Réseaux IP Européens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) was the appropriate organization to operate the server because of its neutrality and technical expertise. In particular, the RIPE NCC was deemed able to change the server’s deployment following changes in Internet topology. At the time, all deployments were unicast. The RIPE DNS working group suggested deploying near or at one of the existing open exchange points. Consequently, the first deployment was at the LINX in London. The LINX contributed hosting and local hands, while the RIPE NCC provided the hardware and covered operations. This choice re-emphasized the independence of the location of the operator and the server itself. This was followed shortly thereafter by the deployment of a hot standby at the AMS-IX. | ||
In the Asia Pacific Region, the Widely Integrated Distributed Environment (WIDE) organization was chosen. | In the Asia Pacific Region, the Widely Integrated Distributed Environment (WIDE) organization was chosen. | ||
| Line 180: | Line 181: | ||
With K-Root and M-Root assigned, there remained two additional root servers to be assigned. Unfortunately, Jon Postel died on 16 October 1998, and there was no one to drive the process of assigning these additional root servers. [[J-Root]] stayed with NSI and remained with [[Verisign]] after it acquired NSI in 2000. | With K-Root and M-Root assigned, there remained two additional root servers to be assigned. Unfortunately, Jon Postel died on 16 October 1998, and there was no one to drive the process of assigning these additional root servers. [[J-Root]] stayed with NSI and remained with [[Verisign]] after it acquired NSI in 2000. | ||
Before Postel’s death, it was planned that USC would transfer certain responsibilities, assets, and personnel to [[ICANN]]. Founded in 1998, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is a private not-for-profit public benefit corporation. It has performed the IANA functions on behalf of the global Internet community since the organization’s creation in 1998. In 1999, this transfer occurred, which included [[L-Root]]. | Before Postel’s death, it was planned that USC would transfer certain responsibilities, assets, and personnel to [[ICANN]]. Founded in 1998, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is a private not-for-profit public benefit corporation. It has performed the IANA functions on behalf of the global Internet community since the organization’s creation in 1998. In 1999, this transfer occurred, which included [[L-Root]]. On 09th Dec 2002, IPv6 support was added to H at address 2001:500:1::803f:235 (no AAAA’s added to root zone until 2008). The .mil zone is removed from the root servers in 2006 that had been providing authoritative support (A, B, E, F, G, and H). | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 222: | Line 223: | ||
[[Category:RSSAC Caucus]] | [[Category:RSSAC Caucus]] | ||
[[Category:ICANN History]] | [[Category:ICANN History]] | ||
[[Category:DNS Servers]] | |||
[[Category:DNS Services]] | |||
Latest revision as of 17:10, 28 April 2023
History of ROOT-SERVERS - A Journey from 4 nodes to 13 nodes at present. Based on the excerpt from “History of Root DNS Servers” by RSSAC.[1][2]
1.1 Period 1983-1986[edit | edit source]
Before the development of the DNS, information about hosts was assigned in a flat namespace format and name-to-address lookups were done using a table, which use to be available in all the hosts. Network Information Centre (NIC) at SRI International, use to maintain this table and all hosts get the updated copy from SRI-NIC periodically. At that time, most of the hosts were at ARPANET (Advanced Research Project Agency Network) and DND (Defense Data Network), and managing the host records in a flat file wasn’t that tough. [3][4]
As the number of hosts were increasing so was the size of this flat file, and with the frequency of updates, a decentralized database need was felt. To address this problem, Mr. Jon Postel and Mr. Paul Mockapetris published a number of RFCs that laid down the design of DNS.
To test the DNS, Postel and Mockapetris set up the first root server in 1984 at the Information Science Institute (ISI) at the University of South California (USC). The domain name services were running on the software developed by Mockapetris, named JEEVES. In 1985, an additional root was added at ISI.
An additional root server was placed at SRI International, as it was NIC for DDN and was handling the registration of hosts and maintenance of the hosts.txt file.
Doug Kingston and Mike Muuss, at the Ballistic Research Laboratory (BRL) in the U.S. Army, played an important role in the ongoing development of the Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) package. To assist in the further development of the DNS and to provide a root server for MILNET (which was split from the original ARPANET in 1983, and is the operational, unclassified network component of the Department of Defense Network) in the event that MILNET had to be disconnected from the ARPANET, BRL volunteered in 1985 to host a root server, making it the first root server running BIND on a UNIX operating system.
Thus by 1985, there were four root name servers.
| Name | Software | Organisation |
|---|---|---|
| SRI-NIC | JEEVES | SRI-International |
| ISIB | JEEVES | Information Science Institute, USC |
| ISIC | JEEVES | Information Science Institute, USC |
| BRL-AOS | BIND | Ballistic Research Laboratory, U.S. Army |
By March 1987, SRI-NIC was named SRI-NIC.ARPA, ISIC was named C.ISI.EDU, BRL-AOS was named BRL-AOS.ARPA, and ISIA (previously ISIB) was named A.ISI.EDU. As the DNS was in the early stages of development, root name servers at ISI tended to change machines frequently. In November 1986, ISIB was retired, and replaced by another server named ISIA. In October 1987, ISIC (C.ISI.EDU) was retired as well.
1.2 Period 1986-1990[edit | edit source]
In October 1986, at the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) 6 meeting, Doug Kingston from BRL convened a workshop called “Name Domains for MILNET.” The primary focus was to explore the transition of MILNET to use domain names. IETF 6 Proceedings: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/06.pdf.
During the workshop and also in mailing list discussions afterward, Gunter Air Force Station was mentioned as a possible root server location because of its ability to serve MILNET. Eventually, in November 1987 GUNTER-ADAM (U.S. Air Force Networking Group) was added as a root server.
In 1986, the National Science Foundation Network (NSFNET) went online. Built as a "network of networks" and developed in phases, NSFNET connected supercomputer centers in the U.S. and a variety of regional research and education networks, extending the Internet’s reach throughout the United States.
As NSFNet traffic and registrations grew, people became aware of some cases of poor DNS service due to the limited number and reach of root servers. To address this issue, in July 1987, at the IETF 7 meeting, the name domain planning working group held a one-hour session to discuss root servers. [5]. The goal of the meeting was to select root servers that would provide improved service to the NSFNET. The participants discussed and chose three new name servers –
- University of Maryland, largely because it was in a position to serve equally well the NSFNET, ARPANET, MILNET and SURANET.
- NASA Ames, because it was an ideal location due to its connection to MILNET, ARPANET, NASA-SCINET19, NSFNET and BARRNET.
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), which was part of the New York State Education and Research Network. It was also one of the first Internet service providers in the United States.
These three root servers and GUNTER-ADAM were expected to be operational by IETF 8 in November 1987. In November 1987, C.ISI.EDU was retired from root server duty. As agreed, four additional root servers were added.
| Name | Software | Organisation |
|---|---|---|
| SRI-NIC.ARPA | JEEVES | SRI International |
| A.ISI.EDU | JEEVES | Information Science Institute, USC |
| C.NYSER.NET | BIND | Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute |
| TERP.UMD.NET | BIND | University of Maryland |
| GUNTER-ADAM.ARPA | JEEVES | U.S. Air Force Networking Group |
| NS.NASA.GOV | BIND | NASA Ames |
| BRL-AOS.ARPA | BIND | Ballistic Research Laboratory, U.S. Army |
In November 1988, DDN implemented phase two of the MILNET Domain Name Implementation with DDN MGT Bulletin 42. As a result, SRI-NIC.ARPA was renamed to NIC.DDN.MIL, BRL-AOS.ARPA was renamed to AOS.BRL.MIL, and GUNTERADAM.ARPA was renamed to GUNTER-ADAM.AF.MIL.
Thus, by November 1990, there were seven root servers.
| Original Name | New Name | Organisation |
|---|---|---|
| SRI-NIC.ARPA | NS.NIC.DDN.MIL | SRI International |
| A.ISI.EDU | A.ISI.EDU | Information Science Institute, USC |
| C.NYSER.NET | C.NYSER.NET | Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute |
| TERP.UMD.NET | TERP.UMD.NET | University of Maryland |
| GUNTER-ADAM.ARPA | GUNTER-ADAM.AF.MIL | U.S. Air Force Networking Group |
| NS.NASA.GOV | NS.NASA.GOV | NASA Ames |
| BRL-AOS.ARPA | AOS.BRL.MIL | Ballistic Research Laboratory, U.S. Army |
1.3 Period 1991 – ROOT DNS Outside North America[edit | edit source]
There was an increasing need to have one or more root name servers in Europe to reduce the dependency on the few, expensive and unstable Internet links to the U.S. The issue was a topic of discussion at RIPE 1 on 22 May 1989.[7] On 28 July 1991, the server NIC.NORDU.NET was added to the root zone and became the first non-U.S. root server.
1.4 Period 1991-1992[edit | edit source]
In 1991, the Defense Information Systems Agency awarded the NIC contract to Government Systems, Inc. (GSI), which in turn outsourced the contract to Network Solutions, Inc. (NSI). As a result, a few changes happened:
- NS.NIC.DDN.MIL ownership changes from SRI-International to Network Solutions, Inc.
- A.ISI.EDU was retired, and a new root server KAVA.NISC.SRI.COM take the place of A.ISI.EDU.
1.5 1993 – InterNIC[edit | edit source]
Since the 1980s, the registration of domain names was performed by the DDN-NIC under contract by the Department of Defense. This was because most registrants at the time were military users and awardees. By the early 1990s, due to the rapid growth of the NSFNET, academic institutions comprised the majority of new registrations, and the military was no longer willing to fund the registration for these names. The U.S. Federal Networking Council (a group of U.S. Government agencies involved in networking) asked the National Science Foundation (NSF) to assume responsibility for non-military Internet registration. In 1992, after a solicitation process (NSF 9224), the NSF awarded three five-year cooperative agreements, to American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T), General Atomics (GA), and Network Solutions, Inc. (NSI). The contracted parties were to provide directory and database services, information services and non-military registration services, respectively. These companies adopted the name InterNIC for their joint role.
Around the time Network Solutions won the bid to manage the domain registration service, it asked Jon Postel (IANA) about adding NS.INTERNET.NET as a root name server. Postel agreed and IANA added NS.INTERNET.NET as a root server in April 1993.
In May 1994, KAVA.NISC.SRI.COM at SRI International was retired due to a lack of funding, and NS1.ISI.EDU was added as a root server to replace it. In 1994, Paul Vixie and Rick Adams asked Jon Postel (IANA) on behalf of the Internet Software Consortium (ISC) to add a root server at ISC. Postel agreed, and in September 1994, IANA added NS.ISC.ORG as a root server. ISC was the organisation coordinating the ongoing development and distribution of the most-used name server software, BIND, after taking over responsibility for BIND from Digital Equipment Corporation. In October 1994, C.NYSER.NET changed to C.PSI.NET, as part of the commercialisation of the Internet service provider (ISP).
1.6 1995 – Renaming Root Servers to root-servers.net[edit | edit source]
By April 1993, the number of root name servers had grown to an extent where the size of a root hints response was approaching the limit of 512 bytes. Bill Manning and Paul Vixie developed a plan to rename all root servers under the root-servers.net domain. In 1994, when ISC first began to run a root name server, the company name was Internet Software Consortium. it was later changed to Internet Systems Consortium. This would allow the use of DNS label compression to fit all the names within 512 bytes. Postel (IANA) agreed with the plan and Mark Kosters began the renaming phases in 1995.
| Original Name | New Name | Organisation |
|---|---|---|
| NS.InterNIC.NET | A.root-servers.net | InterNIC (Operated by NSI) |
| NS1.ISI.EDU | B.root-servers.net | Information Science Institute, USC |
| C.PSI.NET | C.root-servers.net | PSINet |
| TERP.UMD.NET | D.root-server.net | University of Maryland |
| NS.NASA.GOV | E.root-servers.net | NASA Ames Research Centre |
| NS.ISC.ORG | F.root-server.net | Internet Software Consortium |
| NS.NIC.DDN.MIL | G.root-server.net | GSI (Operated by NSI) |
| AOS.ARL.ARMY.MIL | H.root-server.net | U.S. Army Research Lab |
| NIC.NORDU.NET | I.root-server.net | NORDUnet |
1.7 1997 – Adding J, K, L and M[edit | edit source]
Until 1996, there were only 9 Root Servers and with the migration to root-servers.net, operators were able to take advantage of DNS label compression. Domain name compression was introduced in RFC1035 as an optional protocol feature and later mandated by RFC1123. In this scheme, an entire domain name or a list of labels at the end of a domain name is replaced with a pointer to a prior occurrence of the same name in the same message, thus eliminating the repetition of domain names in a message and reducing the size of the message. In the case of responses to root server priming queries, the domain root-servers.net appears only once in the response, instead of 13 times (once for each root server). There was then room for four additional root servers to fit within a 512-byte DNS response. The limitation is specified in RFC 1035 because at the time there were networks that could not handle DNS packets larger than 512 bytes without fragmenting. Also, known firewall rules dropped DNS packets more than 512 bytes in size.
In January 1997, servers J-Root, K-Root, L-Root, and M-Root were added, serving the root zone exclusively. Postel (IANA) asked Network Solutions Inc. to set up two additional servers with the intention of moving them to suitable operators quickly thereafter. He kept two more servers at USC-ISI with the same intention. J-Root and K-Root were set up at Network Solutions on the U.S. East Coast, while L-Root and M-Root were at USC ISI on the U.S. West Coast.
From interviews, it appears that Jon Postel developed and used a few simple criteria in selecting organizations to host these new servers:
- Need: The need for root server service. At the time, Europe had one operator. As the Internet developed in Europe, another root server would be useful. There were also no root servers in Asia, so a root server was needed there. The primary tool that Postel used to determine the need was Larry Landweber’s International Connectivity Map.
- Connectivity: The potential operator must have good connectivity both to the internal infrastructure (internal connectivity) and to the world (external connectivity).
- Community consensus: The potential operator should demonstrate the widest possible support from the community being served.
- Commitment to send and respond to traffic without filtering. The operator must be able to answer every DNS query and send responses back unfiltered.
For the European region, a number of parties expressed their willingness to operate a second root name server. Jon Postel (IANA) encouraged all parties to seek consensus about the matter. After thorough discussion, there was consensus that the Réseaux IP Européens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) was the appropriate organization to operate the server because of its neutrality and technical expertise. In particular, the RIPE NCC was deemed able to change the server’s deployment following changes in Internet topology. At the time, all deployments were unicast. The RIPE DNS working group suggested deploying near or at one of the existing open exchange points. Consequently, the first deployment was at the LINX in London. The LINX contributed hosting and local hands, while the RIPE NCC provided the hardware and covered operations. This choice re-emphasized the independence of the location of the operator and the server itself. This was followed shortly thereafter by the deployment of a hot standby at the AMS-IX.
In the Asia Pacific Region, the Widely Integrated Distributed Environment (WIDE) organization was chosen.
These selections provided additional organizational diversity in the operation of root servers. Operators now included educational institutions, governments, commercial companies and not-for-profit service organizations.
In May 1997, K-Root (K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET) moved to London LINX, managed by RIPE NCC. In August 1997, M-Root (M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET) moved to Japan, managed by WIDE.
1.8 Root Servers after Postel’s Death[edit | edit source]
With K-Root and M-Root assigned, there remained two additional root servers to be assigned. Unfortunately, Jon Postel died on 16 October 1998, and there was no one to drive the process of assigning these additional root servers. J-Root stayed with NSI and remained with Verisign after it acquired NSI in 2000.
Before Postel’s death, it was planned that USC would transfer certain responsibilities, assets, and personnel to ICANN. Founded in 1998, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is a private not-for-profit public benefit corporation. It has performed the IANA functions on behalf of the global Internet community since the organization’s creation in 1998. In 1999, this transfer occurred, which included L-Root. On 09th Dec 2002, IPv6 support was added to H at address 2001:500:1::803f:235 (no AAAA’s added to root zone until 2008). The .mil zone is removed from the root servers in 2006 that had been providing authoritative support (A, B, E, F, G, and H).
Current Root Server name, IP Address and Operator[edit | edit source]
| Hostname | IP Addresses | Root Server Operator |
|---|---|---|
| A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET | 198.41.0.4, 2001:503:ba3e::2:30 | Verisign, Inc. |
| B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET | 192.228.79.201, 2001:500:84::b | Information Sciences Institute, USC |
| C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET | 192.33.4.12, 2001:500:2::c | Cogent Communications |
| D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET | 199.7.91.13, 2001:500:2d::d | University of Maryland |
| E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET | 192.203.230.10, 2001:500:a8::e | NASA Ames Research Center |
| F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET | 192.5.5.241, 2001:500:2f::f | Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. |
| G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET | 192.112.36.4, 2001:500:12::d0d | U.S. Department of Defense Network Information Center |
| H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET | 198.97.190.53, 2001:500:1::53 | U.S. Army Research Lab |
| I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET | 192.36.148.17, 2001:7fe::53 | Netnod |
| J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET | 192.58.128.30, 2001:503:c27::2:30 | Verisign, Inc. |
| K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET | 193.0.14.129,, 2001:7fd::1 | RIPE NCC |
| L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET | 199.7.83.42, 2001:500:3::42 | ICANN |
| M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET | 202.12.27.33, 2001:dc3::35 | WIDE Project and JPRS |