Jump to content

Association of National Advertisers: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
Tehreem (talk | contribs)
1,753 edits
No edit summary
Christiane (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, steward, Administrators, translator
3,247 edits
m Christiane moved page ANA to Association of National Advertisers over redirect: Standardize
 
(74 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{CompanyInfo|
{{CompanyInfo|
| logo            = ANALogo.gif
| logo            = ANALogo.gif
| type            = non-profit
| type            = Non-Profit
| industry        = Nonprofit Organization Management
| industry        = Nonprofit Organization Management
| founded        = 1910
| founded        = June 24, 1910
| founders        =  
| founders        =  
| ownership      =  
| ownership      =  
Line 14: Line 14:
| revenue        =  
| revenue        =  
| email          =  
| email          =  
| website        = [http://www.ana.net ANA]
| website        = [http://www.ana.net ANA.net]
| blog            = [http://www.ana.net/blogs ANA Blogs]
| blog            = [http://www.ana.net/blogs ANA Blogs]
| facebook        =  
| facebook        =  
| linkedin        = [http://www.linkedin.com/company/association-of-national-advertisers ANA]
| linkedin        = [http://www.linkedin.com/company/association-of-national-advertisers Profile]
| twitter        =  
| twitter        =  
| keypeople      = [[Garry Elliot]], Chairman<br>
| keypeople      = [[Garry Elliot]], Chairman<br>
[[Stephen Quinn]], Vice Chairman<br>
[[Stephen Quinn]], Vice Chairman<br>
[[Bob Liodice]], President & CEO<br>
[[Bob Liodice]], President & CEO<br>
[[Christine Manna]], COO & CFO<br>
[[Bobbie Asano]], Senior Director<br>
[[William Zengel]], Executive Vice President, Member Relations<br>   
[[Tracy Owens]], Vice President of Member Relations<br>   
[[Brian Davidson]], Vice President of Member Relations
}}
}}
[[Image:UnderConstruction.png]]


'''Association of National Advertisers''' Inc. is a non profit trade organization comprising of more than 400 UK and US based advertising companies. It offers marketing and brand building services. The services provided by association include legislative leadership, information resources, professional development, business insights and networking opportunities. It has also taken the responsibility of organizing regional meetings and management forums.<ref>[http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=10544590 BusinessWeek]</ref> It also offers sponsorship for for marketing agencies, consultants, media companies, and PR firms.<ref>[http://www.slideshare.net/ANAPresents SlideShare]</ref>
The '''Association of National Advertisers''' Inc. is the oldest non-profit trade organization representing the American marketing and advertising community. It offers marketing, consulting and brand building services to its members. Initially built by 45 companies, ANA now consists of more than 400 leading marketing and advertising companies, working with over 10,000 brands.<ref>[http://www.ana.net/about About ANA]</ref> The services provided by the association include legislative leadership, information resources, professional development, business insights and networking opportunities. It has also taken the responsibility of organizing regional meetings and management forums.<ref>[http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=10544590 BusinessWeek]</ref> It also offers sponsorship for marketing agencies, consultants, media companies, and PR firms.<ref>[http://www.slideshare.net/ANAPresents SlideShare]</ref>


==Community==
==ANA & ICANN==
ANA is comprised of several committees that meet up three to four times a year to exchange views on different issues and discuss case studies. At the moment ANA's committees are:
Some members of ANA, including [[HP]], [[P&G]], [[General Motors]], [[Wal-Mart]], [[Adobe]], [[Porsche]], [[Vodafone]] and [[Puma]] are strongly opposing the new [[gTLD]] program proposed by [[ICANN]]. It is assumed that the opposition of HP and P&G is not due to the reasons they are stating but due the fact that they cannot apply for .hp or .pg because [[ICANN]] has a restriction on two letter [[TLD]]s for brand names.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/companies-that-cant-apply-for-brand-gtlds-say-they-have-decided-not-to-apply-for-brand-gtlds/ DomainIncite]</ref>
 
ANA says the new program will be a total disaster for the international business community. Through this program anyone would be able to request a new [[TLD]] with potentially any word.<ref>[http://www.advertisingcompliancelaw.com/2011/08/articles/regulation/association-of-national-advertisers-challenges-icann-authority-to-establish-new-top-level-domains/ ANA challenges ICANN authority, AdvertisingComplianceLaw.com]</ref> ANA has written numerous letters to [[ICANN Chairman]] ([[Steve Crocker]]), [[ICANN CEO]] ([[Rod Beckstrom]]), and US government officials overseeing ICANN's authority, which is granted by the [[Department of Commerce]] and its [[National Telecommunications and Information Administration]], to review the new [[gTLD]] program once again because they believe it will create irreversible harm to the international business community.<ref>[http://blog.jothan.com/icann/ana-says-icann-needs-to-conduct-thorough-review-of-conflict-of-interest-policies/ Jothan's Blog]</ref> Not all ANA members are opposed to the new gTLD program, and one member, Canon, has already declared their intent to apply,<ref>[http://www.domainnews.com/en/american-association-of-national-advertisers-huff-and-puff-over-new-gtlds.html ANA Huff and Puff over New gTLDs, DomainNews.com]</ref> those opposed have demanded that [[ICANN]] sort the perceived problems out with ANA board members.<ref>[http://www.domainnews.com/en/association-of-national-advertisers-asks-icann-to-abandon-new-tlds.html Association of National Advertises ask ICANN to Abandon new TLDs, domainnews.com]</ref>
 
ANA started a campaign to educate others about the perceived flaws in the current [[TLD]] program. However, [[Jim Prendergast]], a participant in ICANN policy development, states that the issues raised by ANA are baseless. He says that business advocates have worked with [[ICANN]] throughout the development of the policy. Furthermore, [[ICANN]] believes this program will help prevent [[cybersquatting]] and fraud rather than increase it.<ref>[http://www.circleid.com/posts/20111111_new_tld_spotted_fud/ New TLD spotted FUD, CircleID]</ref>
 
They believe that the current program must be abandoned wholesale, and that ICANN should then come back to the table with ANA present.<ref>[http://www.domainnews.com/en/association-of-national-advertisers-asks-icann-to-abandon-new-tlds.html Association of National Advertises ask ICANN to Abandon new TLDs, domainnews.com]</ref>
 
ANA had nearly non-existent participation during the years that ICANN spent creating the gTLD program, though they were aware of it. Some have argued that the sudden campaign against new TLDs and ICANN is a belated attempt to save face with its members for its lack of participation in creating the program. Responding to a letter sent in October, 2011, [[Rod Beckstrom]] pointed out that a number of suggestions that ANA had made during a 2008 comments session were incorporated into the current version of the program.<ref>[http://www.domainnews.com/en/american-association-of-national-advertisers-huff-and-puff-over-new-gtlds.html ANA Huff and Puff over New gTLDs, domainnews.com]</ref>
 
ANA has also taken issue with [[ICANN]]'s conflict of interest policies and ethics policies, which is another hot topic in ICANN circles as of late 2011. They requested a review and report on these policies.<ref>[http://blog.jothan.com/icann/ana-says-icann-needs-to-conduct-thorough-review-of-conflict-of-interest-policies/ ANA says ICANN Needs to Conduct Thorough Review of Conflict of Interest Policies, blog.jothan.com]</ref>
 
===CRIDO===
87 companies from ANA have created a group and have named it the '''Coalition for Responsible Internet Domain Oversight''' - CRIDO. The main focus of this group is to fight [[ICANN]]'s new [[gTLD]] program, though the group was formed in November, 2011, well after the May, 2011 approval of the program. Given that ICANN had been developing a new gTLD program through its multi-stakeholder model essentially from the organization's very beginnings, it was dramatic timing for large corporations to come out against the deal just months before applications were to be accepted. Details of this group's activities can be found on its official [http://www.crido.org website]. Some major companies are members of CRIDO, including Coca Cola, Burger King, Kellog, Samsung, HP, P&G and [[Dell]]. The complete list of supporting companies can be seen [http://www.ana.net/content/show/id/crido here].<ref>[http://domainincite.com/massive-group-forms-to-kill-off-new-gtlds/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+DomainIncite+(DomainIncite.com) Massive Group Forms to Kill Off New gTLDs, DomainIncite.com]</ref>
 
After the initial membership of CRIDO was announced, other major companies continued to join; the list now notably includes: Wal-Mart, Kraft Foods, Adidas, Reebok, Toyota and the J.M. Smucker Company. Wal-Mart is the world's largest retailer and Kraft Foods the world's second largest food distributor.<ref>[http://www.ana.net/content/show/id/22399 ana.net]</ref>
 
CRIDO has vowed that it will continue to fight the new gTLD Program even after the Application submission window opens in January, 2012. Some expect a lawsuit to be filed by CRIDO against ICANN.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2011/11/16/crido-says-battle-against-new-tlds-wont-end-january-12/ CRIDO says Battle Against New TLDs wont End January 12, domainnamewire.com]</ref>
 
===Issues with the gTLD Program===
ANA has made the following arguments concerning ICANN's new gTLD program:
* It will introduce confusion into the marketplace, thereby increasing cybersquatting and malicious activity
* It will create brand dilution
* There is a lack of material gain for businesses, and it does not create competition and innovation
* It is lacking support from large portions of the business and related communities
* Adds unnecessary cost and concerns to a fragile economy; diverting resources from job creation and capital investment
* It will contravene the rights of brand owners
 
By not addressing these issues, ANA has argued that ICANN is not working in the public interest, which is its mandate. As is, ANA believes that ICANN is effectively cornering brand owners in, whereby they must either pay high costs to run a TLD or risk brand dilution.<ref>[http://www.domainnews.com/en/association-of-national-advertisers-asks-icann-to-abandon-new-tlds.html Association of National Advertises ask ICANN to Abandon new TLD], DomainNews.com.</ref>
 
In September 2012, the ANA warned the [[DOC|US Department of Commerce]] (DOC) on the threats of not adopting a "Do Not Sell" registry or failing to regulate ICANN's newly implemented [[TLD]]s. [[Dan Jaffe]], ANA Group Executive Vice President, noted in a letter, "The Internet community is on the verge of a [TLD] tsunami which will create a huge wave of risk for both businesses and consumers... [there will be] explosive growth in secondary domains (those domains to the left of the dot in Internet addresses). We believe it is critical that the DOC push for a comprehensive protection system that includes both a Do Not Sell registry and strong Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs)."<ref name="marketingvox">[http://www.marketingvox.com/ana-warns-commerce-department-about-top-level-domain-tsunami-051580/ ANA Warns Commerce Department About "Top-Level Domain Tsunami"], MarketingVox.com. Published 28 September 2012. Retrieved 23 November 2012.</ref>
 
ANA emphasized that due to the high number of TLDs to be unveiled by ICANN's [[new gTLD Program]], policing TLDs on one-by-one basis will be difficult, and that taking precautions beforehand will be an important step in preventing future [[cybersquatting]] and fraud difficulties. Cited difficulties include the fraudulent use of brand names in secondary domains -- such as when any brand name is paired with the generic domain [[.sucks]] -- or single company ownership of generic domains -- such as if L'Oreal owned [[.hair]], [[.makeup]], or [[.beauty]].<ref name="marketingvox"></ref>
 
Continued Jaffe,  "The cost to companies that want to defensively register domains at the second level could mount easily into the multi-millions of dollars. The costs of defensive registrations also could be economically unfeasible for small and medium sized companies that will face enhanced risks of cybersquatting, typosquatting and phishing in the expanding top level domain universe."<ref name="marketingvox"></ref>
 
===ICANN & Community Response===
ICANN CEO, [[Rod Beckstrom]] has said that ICANN will “vigorously defend” its gTLD program and the multistakeholder model that created it, asserting that “its responsibility [is to the] broad public interest of the global Internet community, rather than to the specific interests of any particular group”.<ref>[http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-tech/post/icann-responds-to-ana-criticism/2011/08/10/gIQAIork6I_blog.html ICANN Responds to ANA criticism], WashingtonPost.com. Published 2011 August 10.</ref>
 
There has been little sympathy for ANA and CRIDO within the domain industry, even among those who are not supporters of the new [[gTLD]] program. It has been noted by numerous commentators, and even [[ICANN CEO]] [[Rod Beckstrom]], that ANA commented twice on previous drafts on the new gTLD guidebook. They were clearly aware of the program, but failed to create its very loud opposition campaign until about 6 months after the approval of the program, and just a few months before applications are to be accepted.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2011/11/14/why-crido-has-no-cred/ Why CRIDO has no cred, DomainNameWire.com]</ref> The fact is that ICANN had been producing the final program through its [[Multistakeholder Model|multistakeholder model]] for years, and produced a total of 6 draft guidebooks before approving the final version. ANA had the opportunity to participate in this process, as they knew about it, but chose to become only slightly involved.<ref>[http://www.thedomains.com/2011/11/11/the-opposition-to-the-new-gtld-program-is-looking-like-the-fsc-vs-xxx-more-everyday/ The Opposition to the New gTLD Program is looking Like the FSC vs XX Everyday], TheDomains.com. Published 2011 November 11.</ref>
 
===Outside Response===
It seems their intensive lobbying may have been key in securing a U.S. Senate hearing on new gTLDs, scheduled for December 8th, 2011.<ref>[http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/12/02/senate-hearing-gtlds Senate Hearing gTLDs, news.dot-nxt.com]</ref><ref>[http://www.brandchannel.com/home/post/2011/12/05/ICANN-gTLD-Senate-Hearing-120511.aspx ICANN gTLD Senate Hearings, BrandChannel.com]</ref> The hearing was convened by the US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.<ref>[http://www.domainnews.com/en/us-senate-committee-to-hold-hearings-on-new-gtld-concerns.html US Senate Committee to Hold Hearings on New gTLD Concerns, DomainNews.com]</ref> [[Dan Jaffe]], ANA's VP of Government Relations, was announced as a witness ahead of the actual hearing.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/dyson-confirmed-for-new-gtlds-senate-hearing/ Dyson Confirmed for New gTLDs Senate Hearing], DomainIncite.com.</ref>
 
===ANA Members' new gTLD Applications===
Despite ANA's opposition to the program it was common knowledge that many of its largest members would still be filing new gTLD applications. This was generally suspected, but in some cases had already been announced, such as the [[.canon]] bid announced by ANA member [[Canon]].<ref>[http://www.brandchannel.com/home/post/2011/10/21/gTLD-Dot-Branding-Deloitte-Canon-Motorola-102111.aspx gTLD Dot Branding Deloitte Canon Motorola, BrandChannel.com]</ref><ref>[http://www.ana.net/members/list Members List, ANA.net]</ref> This was further confirmed in January, 2012, just days before the launch of the [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD program]], when [[Melbourne IT]] announced it was working on over 100 new gTLD applications for clients, including ANA members.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/melbourne-it-involved-in-100-gtld-applications/ Melbourne IT involved in 100 gTLD applications, DomainIncite.com]</ref> In the end, approximately 100 members of ANA applied for new gTLDs, although many of the applications were probably defensive. Most applied only for their trademarks, but some, including Allstate's applications for [[.carinsurance]] and [[.autoinsurance]], and Wal-Mart's and Safeway's competing applications for [[.grocery]], applied for generic terms as well.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2012/06/15/about-100-ana-members-apply-for-new-top-level-domains/ About 100 ANA members apply for new top level domains, domainnamewire.com]</ref>
 
===Do Not Sell List Proposal===
A few days prior to the scheduled implementation of the new gTLD program, ANA accepted that ICANN will not delay its schedule and proposed the "Do Not Sell List" as a solution to the concerns of brand owners. The Do Not Sell List will include all the brand names of NGO's, IGO's and commercial stakeholders concerned in protecting their brands will be registered temporarily at no cost and it will be maintained by ICANN during the first round of application. ANA volunteered to organize a team of interested constituencies to work with ICANN during the first round of application to address the issues raised by each organization in the list. If no agreement was met after the first round of application, all parties will be free to pursue their legal and equitable rights without prejudice.<ref>[http://www.ana.net/content/show/id/icann-letter-010912 Open Letter to ICANN Board: Answers Needed as Objections Mount]</ref>
 
===Videos to ICANN===
ANA produced a few YouTube videos calling ICANN's claims of community consensus "lies" and attacking the new gTLD program, and also giving a background to ICANN's program and their, albeit belated, opposition to it. Both of the following videos were produced in November, 2011.
 
{{#ev:youtube|ItXF6fI9HNY}}


===New York===
{{#ev:youtube|Nj-bvBtTO8U}}
* Advertising Financial Management
* Agency Relations
* Brand Management
* Business to Business
* Digital Marketing
* Legal Affairs
* Mobile Marketing
* Multicultural Marketing & Diversity
* Production Management 
* Research
* Senior Marketers Think Tank
* Shopper Marketing
* Social Media
* Sponsorship & Event Marketing
* TV & Video


===Other Regions===
==Community==
* Agency Relations, West Coast Chapter
ANA is comprised of several committees that meet three to four times a year to exchange views on different issues and discuss case studies. At the moment ANA's committees are regionally based, with the most committees meeting in New York City. Other prominent committees and chapters are found on the West Coast, and Chicago.<ref>[http://www.ana.net/community ANA Community]</ref>
* Marketing Financial Management & Procurement, West Coast Chapter
* Media, West Coast Chapter
* Social Media, West Coast Chapter
* Integrated Marketing (Chicago Based)
* Midwest Marketers
* Midwest Digital, Social & Mobile
* New England Marketers


<ref>[http://www.ana.net/community ANA Community]</ref>
ANA publishes a bi-monthly magazine for its members, which are distributed at national conferences and events. It also publishes an e-magazine for the business community, which analyzes issues such as measuring brand equity, leveraging emerging technologies, establishing best practices in multicultural marketing and expanding global marketing.<ref>[http://www.ana.net/content/show/id/ana-magazine ANA]</ref><ref>[http://www.warc.com/ContentandPartners/AssociationofNationalAdvertisers.info Warc]</ref>
==School of Marketing==
To promote marketing and brand development skills ANA offers several courses and training workshops. The current catalog of ANA School of Marketing includes courses on the Fundamentals of Marketing, New Product Development, Aligning Marketing to Sales, Advanced Strategic Marketing, Integrated Marketing, Communications Media Strategy, Social Media Digital Marketing, Customer Centricity, Brand Management and Fundamentals Building Brand Equity, etc.<ref>[http://www.ana.net/schoolofmarketing ANA School of Marketing]</ref>


==Events==
==Events==
Line 69: Line 96:
* ANA Digital & Social Media Conference, July 14, 2011
* ANA Digital & Social Media Conference, July 14, 2011
* ANA Advertising Financial Management Conference, held from 1st to 4th May 2011.
* ANA Advertising Financial Management Conference, held from 1st to 4th May 2011.
<ref>[http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=10544590 BusinessWeek]</ref>
* Law and Public Policy Conference on 15-16 March 2011.<ref>[http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=10544590 BusinessWeek]</ref>


A complete list of conferences and webinars by ANA can be seen [http://www.ana.net/events here].
A complete list of conferences and webinars by ANA can be seen [http://www.ana.net/events here].
Line 77: Line 104:


==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
<div style="column-count:2;-moz-column-count:2;-webkit-column-count:2">
{{reflist}}</div>


__NOTOC__
[[Category:Associations]]
[[Category:Companies|ANA]]

Latest revision as of 19:34, 6 May 2024

Type: Non-Profit
Industry: Nonprofit Organization Management
Founded: June 24, 1910
Headquarters: 708 Third Avenue - 33rd Floor

New York, NY 10017

Country: USA
Employees: 11-50
Website: ANA.net
Blog: ANA Blogs
LinkedIn: Profile
Key People
Garry Elliot, Chairman

Stephen Quinn, Vice Chairman
Bob Liodice, President & CEO

The Association of National Advertisers Inc. is the oldest non-profit trade organization representing the American marketing and advertising community. It offers marketing, consulting and brand building services to its members. Initially built by 45 companies, ANA now consists of more than 400 leading marketing and advertising companies, working with over 10,000 brands.[1] The services provided by the association include legislative leadership, information resources, professional development, business insights and networking opportunities. It has also taken the responsibility of organizing regional meetings and management forums.[2] It also offers sponsorship for marketing agencies, consultants, media companies, and PR firms.[3]

ANA & ICANN[edit | edit source]

Some members of ANA, including HP, P&G, General Motors, Wal-Mart, Adobe, Porsche, Vodafone and Puma are strongly opposing the new gTLD program proposed by ICANN. It is assumed that the opposition of HP and P&G is not due to the reasons they are stating but due the fact that they cannot apply for .hp or .pg because ICANN has a restriction on two letter TLDs for brand names.[4]

ANA says the new program will be a total disaster for the international business community. Through this program anyone would be able to request a new TLD with potentially any word.[5] ANA has written numerous letters to ICANN Chairman (Steve Crocker), ICANN CEO (Rod Beckstrom), and US government officials overseeing ICANN's authority, which is granted by the Department of Commerce and its National Telecommunications and Information Administration, to review the new gTLD program once again because they believe it will create irreversible harm to the international business community.[6] Not all ANA members are opposed to the new gTLD program, and one member, Canon, has already declared their intent to apply,[7] those opposed have demanded that ICANN sort the perceived problems out with ANA board members.[8]

ANA started a campaign to educate others about the perceived flaws in the current TLD program. However, Jim Prendergast, a participant in ICANN policy development, states that the issues raised by ANA are baseless. He says that business advocates have worked with ICANN throughout the development of the policy. Furthermore, ICANN believes this program will help prevent cybersquatting and fraud rather than increase it.[9]

They believe that the current program must be abandoned wholesale, and that ICANN should then come back to the table with ANA present.[10]

ANA had nearly non-existent participation during the years that ICANN spent creating the gTLD program, though they were aware of it. Some have argued that the sudden campaign against new TLDs and ICANN is a belated attempt to save face with its members for its lack of participation in creating the program. Responding to a letter sent in October, 2011, Rod Beckstrom pointed out that a number of suggestions that ANA had made during a 2008 comments session were incorporated into the current version of the program.[11]

ANA has also taken issue with ICANN's conflict of interest policies and ethics policies, which is another hot topic in ICANN circles as of late 2011. They requested a review and report on these policies.[12]

CRIDO[edit | edit source]

87 companies from ANA have created a group and have named it the Coalition for Responsible Internet Domain Oversight - CRIDO. The main focus of this group is to fight ICANN's new gTLD program, though the group was formed in November, 2011, well after the May, 2011 approval of the program. Given that ICANN had been developing a new gTLD program through its multi-stakeholder model essentially from the organization's very beginnings, it was dramatic timing for large corporations to come out against the deal just months before applications were to be accepted. Details of this group's activities can be found on its official website. Some major companies are members of CRIDO, including Coca Cola, Burger King, Kellog, Samsung, HP, P&G and Dell. The complete list of supporting companies can be seen here.[13]

After the initial membership of CRIDO was announced, other major companies continued to join; the list now notably includes: Wal-Mart, Kraft Foods, Adidas, Reebok, Toyota and the J.M. Smucker Company. Wal-Mart is the world's largest retailer and Kraft Foods the world's second largest food distributor.[14]

CRIDO has vowed that it will continue to fight the new gTLD Program even after the Application submission window opens in January, 2012. Some expect a lawsuit to be filed by CRIDO against ICANN.[15]

Issues with the gTLD Program[edit | edit source]

ANA has made the following arguments concerning ICANN's new gTLD program:

  • It will introduce confusion into the marketplace, thereby increasing cybersquatting and malicious activity
  • It will create brand dilution
  • There is a lack of material gain for businesses, and it does not create competition and innovation
  • It is lacking support from large portions of the business and related communities
  • Adds unnecessary cost and concerns to a fragile economy; diverting resources from job creation and capital investment
  • It will contravene the rights of brand owners

By not addressing these issues, ANA has argued that ICANN is not working in the public interest, which is its mandate. As is, ANA believes that ICANN is effectively cornering brand owners in, whereby they must either pay high costs to run a TLD or risk brand dilution.[16]

In September 2012, the ANA warned the US Department of Commerce (DOC) on the threats of not adopting a "Do Not Sell" registry or failing to regulate ICANN's newly implemented TLDs. Dan Jaffe, ANA Group Executive Vice President, noted in a letter, "The Internet community is on the verge of a [TLD] tsunami which will create a huge wave of risk for both businesses and consumers... [there will be] explosive growth in secondary domains (those domains to the left of the dot in Internet addresses). We believe it is critical that the DOC push for a comprehensive protection system that includes both a Do Not Sell registry and strong Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs)."[17]

ANA emphasized that due to the high number of TLDs to be unveiled by ICANN's new gTLD Program, policing TLDs on one-by-one basis will be difficult, and that taking precautions beforehand will be an important step in preventing future cybersquatting and fraud difficulties. Cited difficulties include the fraudulent use of brand names in secondary domains -- such as when any brand name is paired with the generic domain .sucks -- or single company ownership of generic domains -- such as if L'Oreal owned .hair, .makeup, or .beauty.[17]

Continued Jaffe, "The cost to companies that want to defensively register domains at the second level could mount easily into the multi-millions of dollars. The costs of defensive registrations also could be economically unfeasible for small and medium sized companies that will face enhanced risks of cybersquatting, typosquatting and phishing in the expanding top level domain universe."[17]

ICANN & Community Response[edit | edit source]

ICANN CEO, Rod Beckstrom has said that ICANN will “vigorously defend” its gTLD program and the multistakeholder model that created it, asserting that “its responsibility [is to the] broad public interest of the global Internet community, rather than to the specific interests of any particular group”.[18]

There has been little sympathy for ANA and CRIDO within the domain industry, even among those who are not supporters of the new gTLD program. It has been noted by numerous commentators, and even ICANN CEO Rod Beckstrom, that ANA commented twice on previous drafts on the new gTLD guidebook. They were clearly aware of the program, but failed to create its very loud opposition campaign until about 6 months after the approval of the program, and just a few months before applications are to be accepted.[19] The fact is that ICANN had been producing the final program through its multistakeholder model for years, and produced a total of 6 draft guidebooks before approving the final version. ANA had the opportunity to participate in this process, as they knew about it, but chose to become only slightly involved.[20]

Outside Response[edit | edit source]

It seems their intensive lobbying may have been key in securing a U.S. Senate hearing on new gTLDs, scheduled for December 8th, 2011.[21][22] The hearing was convened by the US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.[23] Dan Jaffe, ANA's VP of Government Relations, was announced as a witness ahead of the actual hearing.[24]

ANA Members' new gTLD Applications[edit | edit source]

Despite ANA's opposition to the program it was common knowledge that many of its largest members would still be filing new gTLD applications. This was generally suspected, but in some cases had already been announced, such as the .canon bid announced by ANA member Canon.[25][26] This was further confirmed in January, 2012, just days before the launch of the new gTLD program, when Melbourne IT announced it was working on over 100 new gTLD applications for clients, including ANA members.[27] In the end, approximately 100 members of ANA applied for new gTLDs, although many of the applications were probably defensive. Most applied only for their trademarks, but some, including Allstate's applications for .carinsurance and .autoinsurance, and Wal-Mart's and Safeway's competing applications for .grocery, applied for generic terms as well.[28]

Do Not Sell List Proposal[edit | edit source]

A few days prior to the scheduled implementation of the new gTLD program, ANA accepted that ICANN will not delay its schedule and proposed the "Do Not Sell List" as a solution to the concerns of brand owners. The Do Not Sell List will include all the brand names of NGO's, IGO's and commercial stakeholders concerned in protecting their brands will be registered temporarily at no cost and it will be maintained by ICANN during the first round of application. ANA volunteered to organize a team of interested constituencies to work with ICANN during the first round of application to address the issues raised by each organization in the list. If no agreement was met after the first round of application, all parties will be free to pursue their legal and equitable rights without prejudice.[29]

Videos to ICANN[edit | edit source]

ANA produced a few YouTube videos calling ICANN's claims of community consensus "lies" and attacking the new gTLD program, and also giving a background to ICANN's program and their, albeit belated, opposition to it. Both of the following videos were produced in November, 2011.

Load video
YouTube
Load video
YouTube

Community[edit | edit source]

ANA is comprised of several committees that meet three to four times a year to exchange views on different issues and discuss case studies. At the moment ANA's committees are regionally based, with the most committees meeting in New York City. Other prominent committees and chapters are found on the West Coast, and Chicago.[30]

ANA publishes a bi-monthly magazine for its members, which are distributed at national conferences and events. It also publishes an e-magazine for the business community, which analyzes issues such as measuring brand equity, leveraging emerging technologies, establishing best practices in multicultural marketing and expanding global marketing.[31][32]

School of Marketing[edit | edit source]

To promote marketing and brand development skills ANA offers several courses and training workshops. The current catalog of ANA School of Marketing includes courses on the Fundamentals of Marketing, New Product Development, Aligning Marketing to Sales, Advanced Strategic Marketing, Integrated Marketing, Communications Media Strategy, Social Media Digital Marketing, Customer Centricity, Brand Management and Fundamentals Building Brand Equity, etc.[33]

Events[edit | edit source]

Besides organizing several events and conferences, ANA also participates in industry events. Some of these events are:

  • The Strategic Indirect Corporate Sourcing & Procurement Conference held on July 27, 2011.
  • ANA Digital & Social Media Conference, July 14, 2011
  • ANA Advertising Financial Management Conference, held from 1st to 4th May 2011.
  • Law and Public Policy Conference on 15-16 March 2011.[34]

A complete list of conferences and webinars by ANA can be seen here.

External Links[edit | edit source]

  • Complete list of officers.

References[edit | edit source]

  1. ↑ About ANA
  2. ↑ BusinessWeek
  3. ↑ SlideShare
  4. ↑ DomainIncite
  5. ↑ ANA challenges ICANN authority, AdvertisingComplianceLaw.com
  6. ↑ Jothan's Blog
  7. ↑ ANA Huff and Puff over New gTLDs, DomainNews.com
  8. ↑ Association of National Advertises ask ICANN to Abandon new TLDs, domainnews.com
  9. ↑ New TLD spotted FUD, CircleID
  10. ↑ Association of National Advertises ask ICANN to Abandon new TLDs, domainnews.com
  11. ↑ ANA Huff and Puff over New gTLDs, domainnews.com
  12. ↑ ANA says ICANN Needs to Conduct Thorough Review of Conflict of Interest Policies, blog.jothan.com
  13. ↑ Massive Group Forms to Kill Off New gTLDs, DomainIncite.com
  14. ↑ ana.net
  15. ↑ CRIDO says Battle Against New TLDs wont End January 12, domainnamewire.com
  16. ↑ Association of National Advertises ask ICANN to Abandon new TLD, DomainNews.com.
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 ANA Warns Commerce Department About "Top-Level Domain Tsunami", MarketingVox.com. Published 28 September 2012. Retrieved 23 November 2012.
  18. ↑ ICANN Responds to ANA criticism, WashingtonPost.com. Published 2011 August 10.
  19. ↑ Why CRIDO has no cred, DomainNameWire.com
  20. ↑ The Opposition to the New gTLD Program is looking Like the FSC vs XX Everyday, TheDomains.com. Published 2011 November 11.
  21. ↑ Senate Hearing gTLDs, news.dot-nxt.com
  22. ↑ ICANN gTLD Senate Hearings, BrandChannel.com
  23. ↑ US Senate Committee to Hold Hearings on New gTLD Concerns, DomainNews.com
  24. ↑ Dyson Confirmed for New gTLDs Senate Hearing, DomainIncite.com.
  25. ↑ gTLD Dot Branding Deloitte Canon Motorola, BrandChannel.com
  26. ↑ Members List, ANA.net
  27. ↑ Melbourne IT involved in 100 gTLD applications, DomainIncite.com
  28. ↑ About 100 ANA members apply for new top level domains, domainnamewire.com
  29. ↑ Open Letter to ICANN Board: Answers Needed as Objections Mount
  30. ↑ ANA Community
  31. ↑ ANA
  32. ↑ Warc
  33. ↑ ANA School of Marketing
  34. ↑ BusinessWeek
Retrieved from "https://icannwiki.org/index.php?title=Association_of_National_Advertisers&oldid=1350168"