ICM Registry

Type:	Private
Industry:	Internet, Registry
Founded:	Delware, USA, 2000
Founder(s):	Jason Hendeles
Headquarters:	Suite 2500 130, Adelaide Street West, Toronto, Ontario M5H 2M2
Country:	Canada
Website:	ICMRegistry.com
Twitter:	@ICMRegistry
Key People
Stuart Lawley, Chairman and President Jason Hendeles, VP, Strategic Business Development Len Bayles, Chief Technical Officer

ICM Registry is the registry operator behind the .xxx registry. The International Foundation For Online Responsibility (IFFOR) is the sponsoring organization, though it has seen by some as not being sufficiently independent and essentially an extension of ICM. .xxx launched as the Internet's 22nd TLD.

History up to Approval of .xxx at ICANN 40

• 2000- ICM Registry was founded by Jason Hendeles in Delaware, USA.

• 2000- ICM Registry, a private company, submitted a proposal at ICANN’s 2000 Proof of Concept Round, proposing two unsponsored gTLD strings - .kids and .xxx. The evaluators in the Proof of Concept Round recommended against the inclusion of either the .kids or the .xxx TLD strings in the Proof of Concept Round.

• 2004, June- ICM submitted a request for .xxx as an sTLD, or Sponsored Top Level Domain, its sponsoring organization was the International&Foundation&for&Online&Responsibility. They passed the Financial and Technical Review Panels, but failed to pass the Sponsorship panel. That panel found that they did not represent a cohesive community, that they did not have sufficient international participation, that they had not sufficiently involved child safety and law enforcement advocates, and that they would not add value to the Internet. The ICANN Board gave ICM, and 5 other applicants that failed passing the Sponsorship panel, a chance to supplement their application and justify their legitimacy.

• 2005, June- the ICANN Board resolved that the ICANN President and its General Counsel could begin discussing the commercial and technical aspects of a potential registry agreement, despite the fact that the organization still had outstanding issues with the application.

• 2006, March - In the Wellington Communiqué by ICANN's GAC, the supporting body came out against the proposed .xxx. Also at that time, the ICANN Board voted down the revised registry agreement, but still did not throw out the application.

• 2007, January - ICM had posted another iteration of the registry agreement for public comments, while, in March, the GAC noted that it did not believe that the ICANN Board sufficiently answered its questions regarding ICM and the sponsorship criteria. Subsequently, still at ICANN 28 in Lisbon, the board voted down the ICM's application for .xxx. They noted that their decision was made based on the following findings: ICM does not meet the sponsorship requirements; the GAC believes that this lack of clear sponsorship will create public policy issues; the application raises significant law enforcement issues that it does not seek to rectify; the Board and GAC agree that the implementation would involve ICANN overseeing a significant amount of Internet content, which oversteps the organization's technical mandate.

• 2008, June - ICM notified ICANN and requested Independent Review Panel (IRP) proceedings, which is the ultimate appeal under ICANN Bylaws' to any individual or entity that feels they have received a inconsistent, or wrong ICANN ruling. They were the first entity to ever utilize ICANN's IRP option, which was put into place around 2004. ICM noted that ICANN followed improper procedure, whereby they proved Sponsorship requirements, proceeded to the next phase of contract negotiations, and where then unjustly faced once again with sponsorship issues; they alleged that they did not apply the same sponsorship criteria to ICM as they did to other sTLD applicants; they alleged that negotiations were not held in good faith, and that ICANN was overstepping its technical mandate by considering public policy issues. ICANN responded that they always held the right to reject ICM's proposal, despite its stage in the process, and that ICM knew this; that ICANN altered procedure to the benefit of ICM, giving them more time and delaying votes in order to accommodate addendum's to ICM's application; and they noted that the ICANN Board is required to consider the public policy positions of its GAC.

Documents related to the ICM IRP process can be found here

• 2009, September - ICM and ICANN submitted briefing papers, a written testimony, and participated in a 5 day hearing with a 3 member of the IRP panel. The IRP panel was under the discretion of International Centre For Dispute Resolution of the American Arbitration Association.

• 2010- February, 19th - The IRP (Independent Review Panel) issued a declaration in its review of ICM Registry's appeal. The Panel found that the application for the ".xxx sTLD met the required sponsorship criteria," and that "the Board’s reconsideration of that finding was not consistent with the application of neutral, objective and fair documented policy". The panel's finding is non-binding, and of the 3 panelists, one dissented with the majority opinion; the dissenter noted that ICM never satisfied sponsorship requirements and the criteria for the sTLD, and that the ICANN Board conducted itself in a transparent manner.

• 2010, March, 26th - A 45 day public comment was opened to address ICANN's options. They drew up a simple schema to show their options, which can be seen here. Their options were laid out as: 1.) Accept majority finding in full; 2.) Accept majority finding in part; 3.) Adopt dissenting finding. Accepting the majority in part would entail going back to consider A.) The 2005 Board decision that .xxx met sponsorship criteria; B.) the 2007 reconsideration of that decision. Adopting the dissent, and thus continuing to deny .xxx's application would also involve continued consideration of the evaluation uncertainty. The public comment forum addressing ICANN's options received more than 13,000 posts, the highest level of feedback ever received in an ICANN comment period. However, it was noted that many of the comments did not actually fall within the scope of the options map.

• 2010, June - At ICANN Brussels, the Board resolved that it would act in accept the majority opinion of the IRP, and thus set the stage to approve .xxx. They then instructed staff to ensure that ICM's application was still current with no changes made or necessitated. In August, a proposed Registry Agreement was posted for public comment.

• 2010, October - ICANN began trying to rectify outstanding concerns from the GAC with the proposed registry agreement with ICM. This would not be possible, and in March, 2011, ahead of the official approval of the .xxx extension, the GAC issued a statement that it does not support the introduction of the .xxx namespace into the root zone, that some of its members emphatically opposed the measure and would likely block the extension in their country, and that ICANN was risking technical and political fall-out by ignoring their outstanding concerns. ICANN's reasons for not following GAC advice, throughout the entire ICM .xxx application, can be found at the latter half of this document.

• 2011- June, 25th - ICANN's board approved the proposal at ICANN 40 in San Francisco, USA, thereby authorizing the implementation of .xxx in the root zone.

Marketing

ICM Registry announced in September, 2011, that it would be sponsoring world champion, Mike Seebold's, powerboat. The boat is to be unvieled at the 2011 T.R.A.F.F.I.C. conference in Fort Lauderdale, a week before its racing debut at the World Championship in Key West. ICM Registry is a top sponsor for T.R.A.F.F.I.C 2011. In November, 2011, Mike Seebold, in the .XXX boat, won his class in the World Champions Final; the boat did have trouble on two prior qualifying races. Unfortunately, the week of racing was marred by numerous deaths. Michael Berkens notes via his blog that there was a great deal of public interest and acceptance regarding what exactly .xxx is.

Other parts of ICM Registry's marketing plan include video ads featuring a character, Gavin, who flashes between living his normal life with his .com address and his possible new life as a super rich porn dealer made possible by .xxx. The videos were noted as viral hits, and reached international audiences thanks to the variety of subtitles available for them. Some of the more controversial Gavin videos, such as one in which two porn-star types suggestively play with a hotdog, were pulled from YouTube as "deceptive". Apparently, 4 or 5 videos had been yanked by YouTube.

Also in Fall 2011, ICM Registry became a main sponsor of the " Porn Star Road Trip", which sees porn stars traveling for two week stints in a large bus to various nightclubs and industry events. The initial stint sponsored by ICM will see the bus traveling Florida and eventually attending a conference in New Jersey, though there seem to be plans to use the bus and actresses at other future events as well. The .xxx logo is plastered all over the sides of the bus.

At the end of November, 2011, a few weeks before the general availability of .xxx domains, ICM started a media blitz on prominent German and British cable T.V. channels. The media blitz was scheduled to last at least 5 weeks. They had also been busy putting up billboards around the U.S., including in Times Square.

Negative Reaction

At least one critic has labelled ICM Registry's business model, from the domain itself to its advertising, as an "intimidation TLD".

In November, 2011, Manwin Licensing International filed a lawsuit in response to ICM Registry advertisements that used pressure tactics, such as running ads with wording like: ".XXX LANDRUSH IS NOW OPEN. PROTECT YOUR BRAND" or "SECURE YOUR DOMAIN. PROTECT YOUR REPUTATION".

Reserved Names

Hundreds, even thousands, of celebrity names were placed on permanent reserve lists by ICM registry, stemming the need for individual defensive registrations, and the possibility of exceptional legal action. Beyonce.xxx and BritneySpears.xxx are examples of the well-known names in question. The total reserve list is rumored to be about 15,000 names; this list includes the world's capitals, culturally sensitive affiliations such as various spellings of "Mohamed", and premium names that they intend to auction. ICM registry recieved some flack for protecting the celebrity brand and intellectual property of the individuals on the list but not including other possible trademark and IP holders that will have to defensively register $200 domains to protect their brands from being manipulated under a .xxx string.

Defensive Registration

Some of the criticism leveled against ICM, starting during their application process and going forward, was the necessary defensive registration for many brand owners. ICM did make a block list for celebrities and certain other entities. It was reported that many Universites were buying .xxx domains related to their schools, as they did not want someone taking advantage of the name of their school, their sports teams, or their mascots and associating it with sexual material.

Launch

Following the opening of the general availability of .xxx domains on December, 8th, ICM Registry declared the launch of the name space a victory, and described it as "the most successful launch of any new sponsored top level domain". Indeed, their international, high-profile advertising campaign, and the nature of the domain itself, attracted a great deal of media coverage.

Sunrise and Landrush

ICM Registry reported that it received 80,000 sunrise period applications, though this was before they verified the applicants' trademark claims. Half of those applications were received during the last week of sunrise, causing the registry to delay the auction period of the sunrise as it validated each applicants' trademark claims.

The landrush period began November 8th, 2011. The price for domains is comparatively high, which could dissuade some domainers. However, prominent domainers such as Frank Schilling and Mike Berkens have already become involved through the Founders Program.

Founders Program

The Founders Program allowed ICM to sell and allocate about 1,500 .xxx names to 35 companies ahead of its official launch of September, 2011. The program raised over $4m. The first to go live, in August, 2011, was casting.xxx. 9 addresses sold for over $100,000; the most expensive domain was Gay.xxx, which sold for $500,000 to Liberty Media Holdings.

The program was developed specifically for adult webmasters, who were interested in developing a .xxx address ahead of general availability of the namespace. It was targeted at those individuals moving their current brands and websites into the new space and also at those who were interested in starting completely new sites on previously unavailable names, such as videos.xxx. It was their hope to see the .xxx become a more content-rich namespace given that many of the most premium .com addresses are in the hands of professional domainers who keep the pages parked and do not develop them. ICM touted the fact that one of the world's wealthiest domainers, Frank Schilling, got involved with his first TLD launch by negotiating a 7 figure deal to acquire premium names that he would then develop with prominent companies in the adult industry. Names acquired include free.xxx, hot.xxx, and live.xxx. The founders program involved a strict agreement that required the domain to be developed and not parked.

General Availability

General Availability for .xxx domains was opened on December 6, 2011. It created quite a buzz in the industry, and was picked up by non-industry news sources as well; CNN, for example, highlighted the story as a top feature on its website. The availability was set to open at 16:00 UTC, but was delayed by one hour until 17:00. Their site pushing general availability, buy.xxx, was receiving near 1 million visitors per day surrounding the time of general availability.

ICM revealed through a tweet that the first domain purchased during .xxx general availability was IOwn.xxx.

In the first 24 hours of general availability, ICM sold some 55,367 domains. Counting the landrush and sunrise periods, the first day of General Availability brought the total of domains sold to about 160,000. It was estimated that on its first day ICM brought in $3.3 million in revenue, with over half a million of that to be given to its International Fund For Online Responsibility (IFFOR).

Notable Deals

In October, 2011, Gay.xxx was sold for $500,000. It was the highest priced domain yet for .xxx.

In December, 2011, it was announced that a prominent English pornographer, Paul Raymond, was transferring much of his adult portfolio to .xxx; this involves both previous websites, and destinations related to printed materials. these sites will now include paulraymond.xxx, prpvod.xxx, razzledating.xxx, mensworlddating.xxx, menonlydating.xxx, escortdating.xxx, adultsportdating.xxx, clubdating.xxx, fantasydating.xxx, mayfairdating.xxx, and paulraymonddating.xxx. It was not announced whether or not some of his best-known titles, the magazines Mayfair and Razzle, would also be given .xxx sites. This represents the single largest portfolio migration to date for ICM. The move was expected to take effect by February, 2011.

ICM had been sponsoring numerous Paul Raymond events.

It was also announced in December, 2011 that $700,000 worth of domains had been sold to Clips4Sale, which operates a number of clip-oriented porn sites. The sale was made up of a total of 30 domains, with the single most expensive being a $300,000 domain name; two others were sold for over $80,000.

Cyber-Squatting

One of its moves to calm worried trademark holders is its aggressive anti-cybersquatting policy. The Rapid Evaluation Service hopes to shut off any obvious, registered infringements within a period of days.

In December, 2011, it was announced that the National Arbitration Forum (NAB) would handle the Rapid Evaluation Service; they would also be running a second, similar service for ICM, the Charter Eligibility Dispute Resolution Policy. The NAB has been a UDRP evaluator since the late 1990s, and have evaluated over 17,000 domain disputes. The system will be paperless, and the Rapid Evaluation Service lets trademark owners quickly and efficiently challenge any infringement, while the Charter Eligibility Dispute Resolution Policy allows users to challenge the eligibility of a .xxx domain owner. Those owners are expected to be companies or individuals professionally involved in the adult entertainment industry.

Opposition, Controversy, and Legal Action

Prior to the approval to the .xxx domain, their was a good deal of opposition to the proposed namespace. There were governments that threatened to block the TLD wholesale, which some saw as one-step closer to disrupting the global Internet; there were moral oppositions; but perhaps the most sustained opposition was led by the Free Speech Coalition, an adult industry lobbying and advocacy group, and their Executive Director, Diane Duke. Much of the debate centered around the fact that ICM was applying for a Sponsored Top Level Domain, which means that there must be a cohesive, supportive community backing the bid. The Free Speech Coalition is the adult industry's largest trade organization, and was vehemently opposed to the creation of .xxx, which raises the question of whether or not ICM actually represented the community that it purported to. Multiple prominent adult industry members, such as Larry Flynt of Hustler, created a documentary together to expose their feelings of misrepresentation by ICM. Concerns include: increased expenses to business owners without additional revenue; the need to defensively register a .xxx address for an existent website; the effect of "ghettoizing" the industry, thereby pushing porn to the periphery of the Internet where it can be easily blocked, censored, and manipulated; ICM causing outside influence on a community and misrepresenting them and their desires. These issues very much came to a head at ICANN 40 in San Francisco, despite The Free Speech Coalitions staging protests and vocally participating at the event, ICM Registry went on to win approval from the ICANN Board to run a .xxx sTLD registry.

In 2010, ICM CEO, Stuart Lawley, registered on the most popular adult industry forum, xbiz.net, and sustained a conversation with concerned community members for some time. While many points were discussed civilly, some members attacked Mr. Lawley personally, while others merely side-tracked the conversation. A screen-grab of the entire forum thread can be seen here. Diane Duke and Stuart Lawley partook in a live debate on the merits and drawbacks of .xxx at the inaugural XBiz EU Summit, held in London in September, 2010. A video of the interaction can be seen here.

Manwin, one of the most prominent adult content producers on the Internet, filed an Anti-Trust suit against both ICM and ICANN over the creation and implementation of the .xxx TLD. This legal action took place in November, 2011, well after its approval and just before the domain's general availability. It also filed an Independent Review Panel (IRP) Request with ICANN; it is only the second company ever to file such a request, which is somewhat ironic given that ICM was the first to use this mechanism, the outcome eventually overturned the initial denial of a .xxx sTLD. An IRP is a last resort in ICANN beaurcracy, and Manwin filed one because it feels that ICANN's decision to allow .xxx into the root did not “adequately address issues including competition, consumer protection, malicious abuse and rights protection prior to approving the .xxx TLD”.

Countries Banning .xxx

It was of great concern to ICANN, its GAC, and the Internet community that .xxx would be a wholly blockable domain extension in the root zone, this was unprecedented. While many restrictive governments block and censor certain sites, it was a new concept to block an entire extension. This fact failed to stop the passage of .xxx, but many countries have stuck to their word and have blocked the name space, they include:

• India, the first to block .xxx
• Kenya
• China

External links

• ICANN.org ICM Registry Business Plan
• Official website of ICM Registry

Governmental Advisory Committee. Considers and provides advice on the activities of ICANN as they relate to concerns of governments, particularly matters where there may be an interaction between ICANN's policies and various laws and international agreements or where they may affect public policy issues (ICANN Bylaws).

Independent Review Process

Top-Level Domain