Independent Review Process: Difference between revisions
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
On May 7, 2001, the IRP Nominating Committee received an instruction from the Board to seek qualified applicants who will assume the position as members of the IRP within 90 days.<ref> | On May 7, 2001, the IRP Nominating Committee received an instruction from the Board to seek qualified applicants who will assume the position as members of the IRP within 90 days.<ref> | ||
[http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/prelim-report-07may01.htm#01.50 Special Meeting of the Board Preliminary Report May 7, 2001]</ref> Following the directive, the IRP Nominating Committee issued a call to the internet community to submit nominations on June 26, 2001.<ref>[http://icannwiki.com/index.php?title=IRP&action=edit§ion=1 Open Call to the Internet Community For Nominations | [http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/prelim-report-07may01.htm#01.50 Special Meeting of the Board Preliminary Report May 7, 2001]</ref> Following the directive, the IRP Nominating Committee issued a call to the internet community to submit nominations on June 26, 2001.<ref>[http://icannwiki.com/index.php?title=IRP&action=edit§ion=1 Open Call to the Internet Community For Nominations | ||
to the ICANN Independent Review Panel]</ref> The IRP Nominating Committee was unsuccessful in completing the list of candidates for the IRP Panel on the deadline set by the ICANN Board and requested for an extension. During the ICANN Meeting in Montevideo, the Board approved the request of the IRP Nominating Committee and extended the deadline to submit the list of the candidates for the IRP until October 15, 2001.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/prelim-report-10sep01.htm#ScheduleforIRPNomCom Regular Meeting of the ICANN Board in Montevideo Preliminary Report]</ref> The IRP Nominating Committee was not able to provide a complete list during the extended deadline. Only three members of the committee submitted a list of 9 nominees while the other members did not participate in the process. A report on the status of the committee was submitted during the ICANN Meeting in Accra, Ghana on March 14, 2002. The nine individuals nominated for the IRP Panel include: <ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/meetings/accra/indrev-topic.htm ICANN Accra Meeting Topic: Implementation of Independent Review Policy | to the ICANN Independent Review Panel]</ref> The IRP Nominating Committee was unsuccessful in completing the list of candidates for the IRP Panel on the deadline set by the ICANN Board and requested for an extension. During the ICANN Meeting in Montevideo, the Board approved the request of the IRP Nominating Committee and extended the deadline to submit the list of the candidates for the IRP until October 15, 2001.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/prelim-report-10sep01.htm#ScheduleforIRPNomCom Regular Meeting of the ICANN Board in Montevideo Preliminary Report]</ref> The IRP Nominating Committee was not able to provide a complete list during the extended deadline. Only three members of the committee submitted a list of 9 nominees while the other members did not participate in the process. A report on the status of the committee was submitted during the ICANN Meeting in Accra, Ghana on March 14, 2002. The nine individuals nominated for the IRP Panel include: <ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/meetings/accra/indrev-topic.htm ICANN Accra Meeting Topic: Implementation of Independent Review Policy]</REF> | ||
# [[Zoe Baird]] (US) | # [[Zoe Baird]] (US) | ||
# [[Diane Cabell]] (US) | # [[Diane Cabell]] (US) |