Jon Leibowitz: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
==Comments on ICANN== | ==Comments on ICANN== | ||
On December 7, 2011, Mr. Leibowitz expressed his concern over the ICANN's new gTLD program during a hearing conducted by the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet. Although the House inquiry is about "Oversight of the Antitrust Enforcement Agencies," Cong. Bob Goodlatte, chair of the committee asked Leibowitz opinion regarding the possibility of introducing thousands of [TLD]]s. In response, Leibowitz said that FTC is "very, very concerned that this roll-out of new gTLDs has the potential to be a disaster for consumers and for businesses." He points the inaccuracy of information in the [[Whois]] database as the main reason of the concern because it makes law enforcement difficult to track criminals on the internet. He also added that adding more TLDs would make the situation "exponentially worse." Furthermore, he cited that the program provides less benefit to businesses and consumers and the Commission sees enormous costs. On the other hand, when Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren asked Leibowitz regarding ICANN's performance on internet governance and consumer protection, the FTC chair said, "I don't mean to disparage ICANN itself. I think they do a lot of very good things." <ref>[http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/12/07/ftc-chairman-slams-gtld-program FTC 'very, very concerned' about new gTLD program]</ref> | On December 7, 2011, Mr. Leibowitz expressed his concern over the [[ICANN]]'s new [[gTLD]] program during a hearing conducted by the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet. Although the House inquiry is about "Oversight of the Antitrust Enforcement Agencies," Cong. Bob Goodlatte, chair of the committee asked Leibowitz opinion regarding the possibility of introducing thousands of [[TLD]]s. In response, Leibowitz said that FTC is "very, very concerned that this roll-out of new gTLDs has the potential to be a disaster for consumers and for businesses." He points the inaccuracy of information in the [[Whois]] database as the main reason of the concern because it makes law enforcement difficult to track criminals on the internet. He also added that adding more TLDs would make the situation "exponentially worse." Furthermore, he cited that the program provides less benefit to businesses and consumers and the Commission sees enormous costs. On the other hand, when Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren asked Leibowitz regarding ICANN's performance on internet governance and consumer protection, the FTC chair said, "I don't mean to disparage ICANN itself. I think they do a lot of very good things." <ref>[http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/12/07/ftc-chairman-slams-gtld-program FTC 'very, very concerned' about new gTLD program]</ref> | ||
Following his statement at the US Senate's House Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet Subcommittee, Leibowitz sent a letter to ICANN regarding the new gTLD program on December 16. In his letter, Leibowitz strongly encouraged ICANN to immediately act and resolve the issues raised by FTC and the Governmental Advisory Committee ([[GAC]]) particularly on consumer protection and malicious abuse on the internet before implementing the program. He also enumerated the recommendations of the FTC in his letter which include:<ref> | |||
[http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/12/16/ftc-letter-to-icann FTC letter to ICANN over new gTLDs]</ref> | |||
* Implement the new gTLD program as a pilot program. Substantially reduce the number of gTLDs to be introduced during the first round of application. | |||
* Strengthen ICANN’s contractual compliance program by hiring additional compliance staff. | |||
* Create a new ongoing program to monitor possible consumer issues that would come up after the implementation of the new gTLD program. | |||
* Evaluate the risk of consumer harm associated with every proposed new gTLD and include the result of the assessment in the approval process. | |||
* Improve the accuracy of the Whois data by requiring a registrant verification. | |||
==References== | ==References== |