Difference between revisions of ".health"

From ICANNWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 29: Line 29:
  
 
France and Mali both objected to all four applications; France claims that the demands for legitimacy with regards to health services around the world prevents .health from being an easily deployable TLD, and that all applicants need greater security measures, they further note that: " We also refer to the requests from the World Health Organization NGOs, and others, who wrote to ICANN and the GAC to delay the attribution of the string to allow for consultation with the global health community on operating the TLD in the Public Interest."<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Health-FR-6394.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353451859000 Health FR, GACweb.ICANN.org]</ref> Mali makes similar claims, and Cameroon also submitted an Early Warning to [[Afilias]] .health application, copying the French warning verbatim.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Health-CM-1-3442.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353378092000 Health CM, GACWeb.ICANN.org]</ref>
 
France and Mali both objected to all four applications; France claims that the demands for legitimacy with regards to health services around the world prevents .health from being an easily deployable TLD, and that all applicants need greater security measures, they further note that: " We also refer to the requests from the World Health Organization NGOs, and others, who wrote to ICANN and the GAC to delay the attribution of the string to allow for consultation with the global health community on operating the TLD in the Public Interest."<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Health-FR-6394.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353451859000 Health FR, GACweb.ICANN.org]</ref> Mali makes similar claims, and Cameroon also submitted an Early Warning to [[Afilias]] .health application, copying the French warning verbatim.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Health-CM-1-3442.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353378092000 Health CM, GACWeb.ICANN.org]</ref>
 +
 +
Donuts replied to France´s warning to .health, and its similar objections for [[.architect]], [[.sarl]], and [[.vin]], with an impassioned defense of the validity of open registration for New gTLDs.It notes that restricting registration unfairly assumes malfeasance on the part of the registrant, that no such restrictions exist for related domains in any exisiting gTLDs or ccTLDs, and that verification and restriction would inevitably raise the price of registration significantly. They go on to quote the GAC's own advice with regards to its contract with [[.xxx]] registry provider, [[ICM Registry]], which notes that at that time the GAC was against any monitoring of TLD content given that it seems to overstep ICANN's technical mandate.<ref>[http://donuts.co/news/files/donuts_reply_to_france_ARCHITECT_HEALTH_HOTEL_SARL_VIN.pdf Donuts reply to France, donuts.co]Published February 5 2013, Retrieved 8 Feb 2013</ref>
 +
 
===European Commission Communiqué===
 
===European Commission Communiqué===
 
The [[European Commission]] flagged all applicants for .health outside of ICANN's defined remediation processes.
 
The [[European Commission]] flagged all applicants for .health outside of ICANN's defined remediation processes.

Revision as of 17:32, 8 February 2013

Status: Proposed
Category: Health
Priority #: 396 - DotHealth, LLC
430 - Afilias
795 - Donuts (Goose Fest, LLC)
1548 - Famous Four Media (dot Health Limited)

More information: NTLDStatsLogo.png

.health is a proposed generic top level domain name (gTLD) in ICANN's New gTLD Program.

Applicants[edit | edit source]

  1. DotHealth, LLC
  2. Afilias, is a registry operator which also applied for TLDs on its own behalf.[1][2]
  3. Famous Four Media (dot Health Limited), Geir Rasmussen is the contact person for the company, which has applied for 61 TLDs.[3][4]
  4. Donuts (Goose Fest LLC), one of 307 applications submitted by the company. [5]

GAC Early Warnings[edit | edit source]

Applicants for .health, were subject to a number of GAC Early Warnings.The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the ICANN Board that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.[6]

France and Mali both objected to all four applications; France claims that the demands for legitimacy with regards to health services around the world prevents .health from being an easily deployable TLD, and that all applicants need greater security measures, they further note that: " We also refer to the requests from the World Health Organization NGOs, and others, who wrote to ICANN and the GAC to delay the attribution of the string to allow for consultation with the global health community on operating the TLD in the Public Interest."[7] Mali makes similar claims, and Cameroon also submitted an Early Warning to Afilias .health application, copying the French warning verbatim.[8]

Donuts replied to France´s warning to .health, and its similar objections for .architect, .sarl, and .vin, with an impassioned defense of the validity of open registration for New gTLDs.It notes that restricting registration unfairly assumes malfeasance on the part of the registrant, that no such restrictions exist for related domains in any exisiting gTLDs or ccTLDs, and that verification and restriction would inevitably raise the price of registration significantly. They go on to quote the GAC's own advice with regards to its contract with .xxx registry provider, ICM Registry, which notes that at that time the GAC was against any monitoring of TLD content given that it seems to overstep ICANN's technical mandate.[9]

European Commission Communiqué[edit | edit source]

The European Commission flagged all applicants for .health outside of ICANN's defined remediation processes.

Just after ICANN's GAC issued its Early Warnings, which are advice given from one GAC member country to an applicant warning it of potential issues within its application, the European Commission issued a letter to all applicants within the new gTLD program. The letter highlights 58 applications that "could raise issues of compatibility with the existing legislation .. and/or with policy positions and objectives of the European Union." It notes a desire to open a dialogue with each offending applicant.

The Commission specifically notes that this objection is not a part of the GAC Early Warning process, and goes on to note that "the Commission does not consider itself legally bound to [ICANN] processes," given that there is not legal agreement between the two bodies.[10][11]


References[edit | edit source]