Continuous Improvement Program: Difference between revisions
NanaYawBotar (talk | contribs) m created a table for list of members |
m MarkWD moved page Continuous Improvement Program - CIP to Continuous Improvement Program |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The | The '''Continuous Improvement Program''' (CIP) is a proposed transformation organizational review by the Third Accountability and Transparency Review ([[ATRT3]]) Recommendation 3.6. [[ICANN]] is tasked with collaborating with each [[Supporting Organizations|Supporting Organization]] (SO), [[Advisory Committee]] (AC), their stakeholder groups, and the [[Nominating Committee]] (NomCom) to establish this program. | ||
==== Objectives ==== | ==== Objectives ==== | ||
* Develop an annual satisfaction survey and a regular assessment. | * Develop an annual satisfaction survey and a regular assessment. | ||
* Publish summaries of continuous improvement at least every three years. | * Publish summaries of continuous improvement at least every three years. | ||
==== Development Phases ==== | ==== Development Phases ==== | ||
* '''CIP Framework Development:''' Estimated to take 12 months, concluding by December 2024. | * '''CIP Framework Development:''' Estimated to take 12 months, concluding by December 2024. | ||
* '''CIP Assessment Period 1:''' Expected to begin in 2024 and end in 2027. | * '''CIP Assessment Period 1:''' Expected to begin in 2024 and end in 2027. | ||
Line 18: | Line 16: | ||
==== Purpose ==== | ==== Purpose ==== | ||
* Serve as a forum to exchange best practices, lessons learned, and share progress on continuous improvement activities. | * Serve as a forum to exchange best practices, lessons learned, and share progress on continuous improvement activities. | ||
* Collaborate on community-wide implementation of ATRT3 Recommendation 3.6. | * Collaborate on community-wide implementation of ATRT3 Recommendation 3.6. | ||
==== Responsibilities ==== | ==== Responsibilities ==== | ||
* Develop a shared understanding of Continuous Improvement. | * Develop a shared understanding of Continuous Improvement. | ||
* Identify existing continuous improvement activities. | * Identify existing continuous improvement activities. | ||
Line 30: | Line 26: | ||
==== Community Involvement ==== | ==== Community Involvement ==== | ||
* Each community group, including NomCom, is requested to appoint a representative to the CIP-CCG. | * Each community group, including NomCom, is requested to appoint a representative to the CIP-CCG. | ||
* Initial meeting planned for December 2023. | * Initial meeting planned for December 2023. | ||
==== Functions ==== | ==== Functions ==== | ||
* Experience-sharing and information forum, not a decision-making body. | * Experience-sharing and information forum, not a decision-making body. | ||
* May present joint proposals for discussion by the SOAC Chairs. | * May present joint proposals for discussion by the SOAC Chairs. | ||
Line 41: | Line 35: | ||
=== CIP-CCG Membership === | === CIP-CCG Membership === | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|'''SO/AC Affiliation''' | |'''SO/AC Affiliation''' | ||
|'''Name''' | |'''Name''' | ||
|'''Membership Level''' | |||
|- | |- | ||
| rowspan=" | | rowspan="3" |[[At-Large Advisory Committee|At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC)]] | ||
| | |Cheryl Langdon-Orr | ||
|Representative | |Representative | ||
|- | |||
|Tommi Karttaavi | |||
|Resignation Notice | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Bukola Oronti | |Bukola Oronti | ||
Line 54: | Line 50: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[Governmental Advisory Committee|Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC)]] | |[[Governmental Advisory Committee|Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC)]] | ||
| | |Tracy Hackshaw | ||
|Representative | |Representative | ||
|- | |- | ||
| rowspan="2" | | rowspan="2" |Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC) | ||
|Naveed Bin Rais | |Naveed Bin Rais | ||
|Representative | |Representative | ||
Line 64: | Line 60: | ||
|Alternate | |Alternate | ||
|- | |- | ||
| rowspan="2" | | rowspan="2" |Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council | ||
|Damon Ashcraft | |Damon Ashcraft | ||
|Representative | |Representative | ||
Line 89: | Line 85: | ||
|Alternate | |Alternate | ||
|- | |- | ||
| rowspan=" | | rowspan="3" |European Regional At-Large Organization (EURALO) | ||
|Sebastien Bachollet | |Sebastien Bachollet | ||
|Representative | |Representative | ||
|- | |||
|Ricardo Holmquist | |||
|Resignation Notice | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Natalia Filina | |Natalia Filina | ||
Line 100: | Line 99: | ||
|Representative | |Representative | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Christelle Vaval | ||
|Alternate | |Alternate | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Harold Arcos | ||
|Alternate | |Temporary Alternate (June - August 2024) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| rowspan="2" |North American Regional At-Large Organization (NARALO) | | rowspan="2" |North American Regional At-Large Organization (NARALO) | ||
Line 113: | Line 112: | ||
|Alternate | |Alternate | ||
|- | |- | ||
| rowspan="2" |GNSO Not-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) | | rowspan="2" |[[NPOC|GNSO Not-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC)]] | ||
|Caleb Ogundele | |Caleb Ogundele | ||
|Representative | |Representative | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Wisdom Donkor | ||
|Alternate | |Alternate | ||
|- | |- | ||
|GNSO Business Constituency (BC) | |[[Business Constituency|GNSO Business Constituency (BC)]] | ||
|Nenad Orlic | |Nenad Orlic | ||
|Representative | |Representative | ||
Line 128: | Line 127: | ||
|Representative | |Representative | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Registries Stakeholder Group|GNSO gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG)]] | ||
| | |Chris Disspain | ||
| | |Representative | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | rowspan="2" |[[Intellectual Property Constituency|GNSO Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC)]] | ||
| | |Lori Schulman | ||
| | |Representative | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Marco Martinelli | ||
| | |Alternate | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Security and Stability Advisory Committee|Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC)]] | ||
| | |Jeff Bedser | ||
| | |Representative | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | rowspan="2" |[[CcNSO|Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO)]] | ||
| | |Sean Copeland | ||
| | |Representative | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Irina Danelia | ||
| | |Alternate | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | rowspan="2" |[[NCUC|GNSO Noncommercial Users Constituency (NCUC)]] | ||
| | |Benjamin Akinmoyeje | ||
| | |Representative | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Liubomir Nikiforov | ||
| | |Alternate | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | rowspan="2" |[[Registrar Stakeholder Group|GNSO Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG)]] | ||
| | |Owen Smigelski | ||
| | |Representative | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Tom Barrett]] | ||
| | |Alternate | ||
|} | |} | ||
== Implementation and Coordination == | == Implementation and Coordination == | ||
The implementation of ATRT3 Recommendation 3.6 requires efforts by individual community groups and collective coordination. ICANN has put together terms of reference detailing the expected roles and responsibilities for the CIP Community Coordination Group. The community's implementation work will necessitate collaboration across different groups to address specific items that require coordinated effort. | The implementation of ATRT3 Recommendation 3.6 requires efforts by individual community groups and collective coordination. ICANN has put together terms of reference detailing the expected roles and responsibilities for the CIP Community Coordination Group. The community's implementation work will necessitate collaboration across different groups to address specific items that require coordinated effort. |
Latest revision as of 13:20, 12 June 2024
The Continuous Improvement Program (CIP) is a proposed transformation organizational review by the Third Accountability and Transparency Review (ATRT3) Recommendation 3.6. ICANN is tasked with collaborating with each Supporting Organization (SO), Advisory Committee (AC), their stakeholder groups, and the Nominating Committee (NomCom) to establish this program.
Objectives[edit | edit source]
- Develop an annual satisfaction survey and a regular assessment.
- Publish summaries of continuous improvement at least every three years.
Development Phases[edit | edit source]
- CIP Framework Development: Estimated to take 12 months, concluding by December 2024.
- CIP Assessment Period 1: Expected to begin in 2024 and end in 2027.
- CIP Assessment Period 2: Projected to start in 2028 and conclude at the end of 2030.
Holistic Review Implementation[edit | edit source]
In tandem with the CIP, ICANN is working on ATRT3 Recommendation 3.5, which calls for a Holistic Review. Both the CIP and Holistic Review will start as pilot programs, with CIP assessment results informing the Pilot Holistic Review.
CIP Community Coordination Group (CIP-CCG)[edit | edit source]
Purpose[edit | edit source]
- Serve as a forum to exchange best practices, lessons learned, and share progress on continuous improvement activities.
- Collaborate on community-wide implementation of ATRT3 Recommendation 3.6.
Responsibilities[edit | edit source]
- Develop a shared understanding of Continuous Improvement.
- Identify existing continuous improvement activities.
- Agree on methodologies for effective continuous improvement programs.
- Formulate a CIP Framework for implementation.
Community Involvement[edit | edit source]
- Each community group, including NomCom, is requested to appoint a representative to the CIP-CCG.
- Initial meeting planned for December 2023.
Functions[edit | edit source]
- Experience-sharing and information forum, not a decision-making body.
- May present joint proposals for discussion by the SOAC Chairs.
CIP-CCG Membership[edit | edit source]
SO/AC Affiliation | Name | Membership Level |
At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) | Cheryl Langdon-Orr | Representative |
Tommi Karttaavi | Resignation Notice | |
Bukola Oronti | Alternate | |
Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) | Tracy Hackshaw | Representative |
Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC) | Naveed Bin Rais | Representative |
Erum Welling | Alternate | |
Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council | Damon Ashcraft | Representative |
Manju Chen | Alternate | |
Nominating Committee (NomCom) | Tijani Ben Jemaa | Representative |
African Regional At-Large Organization (AFRALO) | Bram Fudzulani | Representative |
Chokri Ben Romdhane | Alternate | |
Asian, Australasian, and Pacific Islands Regional At-Large Organization (APRALO) | Amrita Choudhury | Representative |
Justine Chew | Alternate | |
European Regional At-Large Organization (EURALO) | Sebastien Bachollet | Representative |
Ricardo Holmquist | Resignation Notice | |
Natalia Filina | Alternate | |
Latin American and Caribbean Islands Regional At-Large Organization (LACRALO) | Carlos Aguirre | Representative |
Christelle Vaval | Alternate | |
Harold Arcos | Temporary Alternate (June - August 2024) | |
North American Regional At-Large Organization (NARALO) | Alan Greenberg | Representative |
Bill Jouris | Alternate | |
GNSO Not-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) | Caleb Ogundele | Representative |
Wisdom Donkor | Alternate | |
GNSO Business Constituency (BC) | Nenad Orlic | Representative |
GNSO ISPs and Connectivity Providers Constituency (ISPCP) | Santanu Acharya | Representative |
GNSO gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG) | Chris Disspain | Representative |
GNSO Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC) | Lori Schulman | Representative |
Marco Martinelli | Alternate | |
Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) | Jeff Bedser | Representative |
Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) | Sean Copeland | Representative |
Irina Danelia | Alternate | |
GNSO Noncommercial Users Constituency (NCUC) | Benjamin Akinmoyeje | Representative |
Liubomir Nikiforov | Alternate | |
GNSO Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG) | Owen Smigelski | Representative |
Tom Barrett | Alternate |
Implementation and Coordination[edit | edit source]
The implementation of ATRT3 Recommendation 3.6 requires efforts by individual community groups and collective coordination. ICANN has put together terms of reference detailing the expected roles and responsibilities for the CIP Community Coordination Group. The community's implementation work will necessitate collaboration across different groups to address specific items that require coordinated effort.