Jump to content

.rugby: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
Marie Cabural (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
m Reverted edits by GovernanceBot (talk) to last revision by Jonah
Tag: Rollback
 
(24 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:UnderConstruction.png]]
{{TLD|
{{TLD|
|logo  =  
|logo  =  
|status = proposed
|status = proposed
|manager  =  
|manager  =  
|country  = International
|country  =
|language =  
|language =  
|translation =  
|translation =  
|stringcontention =  
|stringcontention =  
|registryprovider  =[[Minds + Machines]]
|registryprovider  =
|registrations  =  
|registrations  =  
|date  =
|date  =
|type  = [[Brand gTLD]]
|type  = [[gTLD]]
|community  = rugby sports community
|category= [[:Category:Sport New gTLDs|Sport]]
|community  =  
|priority = 278 - [[International Rugby Board]]<br><s>400 - [[Donuts]] (Atomic Cross, LLC)<br>1322 - [[Famous Four Media]] (dot Rugby Limited)</s>
|keypeople  =  
|keypeople  =  
}}
}}
Line 19: Line 19:
'''.rugby''' is new  generic top level domain name ([[gTLD]]) proposal for the rugby sports community to [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program]].
'''.rugby''' is new  generic top level domain name ([[gTLD]]) proposal for the rugby sports community to [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program]].


==Applicant==
The International Rugby Board (IRB), rugby's governing federation made up of 118 IRB member countries representing more than 5.5 million registered players across all continents, released a press release stating that the application submitted by [[IRB Strategic Developments Limited]] is the only rugby application supported by the international rugby community. The application was founded on a mandate by the Board, and the Board seeks to ensure that the TLD is restricted, used in the best interests of the game of rugby and the rugby community.<ref>[http://www.domainpulse.com/2012/07/05/irb-wants-rugby-to-benefit-rugby-family/ IRB wants .RUGBY to benefit rugby family, domainpulse.com]</ref>
The [[International Rugby Board]] (IRB) in partnership with [[Roar Domains LLC.]] and [[Top Level Domains Holding Ltd.]] is applying for the TLD. [[Minds + Machines]] has been selected by the organization to provide the back-end registry services. IRB's objectives in applying for the TLD  are to serve the interest of the global rugby stakeholders, to promote the sport and its values and to protect its trademarks. If approved, the .rugby gTLD will be open for registration to amateur and professional rugby players, coaches, tournament owners, organizers and other entities affiliated with Rugby. <ref>[http://www.irb.com/newsmedia/mediazone/pressrelease/newsid=2061834.html IRB applies for .Rugby top level domain name]</ref> <ref>[http://domainincite.com/rugby-board-tries-for-rugby-with-tldh/ Rugby board tries for .rugby with TLDH]</ref>  
 
A [[#Community Objection|Community Objection]] by the IRB against the other two applicants was decided in favor of the IRB, thus removing Donuts and Famous Four Media from the contention set.
 
==Current Applicants==
# [[Top Level Domain Holdings Ltd.]] & The [[International Rugby Board]] (IRB), in partnership with [[ROAR Domains]] are applying for the TLD. [[Minds + Machines]] has been selected by the organization to provide the back-end registry services. IRB's objectives in applying for the TLD  are to serve the interest of the global rugby stakeholders, to promote the sport and its values and to protect its trademarks.<ref>[http://www.irb.com/newsmedia/mediazone/pressrelease/newsid=2061834.html IRB applies for .Rugby top level domain name]</ref> <ref>[http://domainincite.com/rugby-board-tries-for-rugby-with-tldh/ Rugby board tries for .rugby with TLDH]</ref> <ref>[http://www.internetnews.me/2012/06/13/so-which-new-tld-applicants-claim-to-be-irish/ So Which New TLD Applicants Claim To Be Irish?]</ref> The applicant has filed a [[PIC|Public Interest Commitment]], which can be downloaded [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/269 here].
 
==Previous Applicants==
# [[Famous Four Media]] (dot Rugby Limited), one of 61 applications filed by the company. The applicant has filed a [[PIC|Public Interest Commitment]], which can be downloaded [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/1221 here]. The International Rugby Board filed a [[Community Objection]] against this application.<ref>[http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/arbitration-and-adr/expertise/icann-new-gtld-dispute-resolution/pending-cases/ Pending Cases, ICCWBO.org] Retrieved 14 May 2013</ref>
# [[Donuts]] (Atomic Cross, LLC), one of 307 applications filed by the company. The applicant has filed a [[PIC|public Interest Commitment]], which can be downloaded [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/606 here]. The International Ruby Board filed a [[Community Objection]] against this application.<ref>[http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/arbitration-and-adr/expertise/icann-new-gtld-dispute-resolution/pending-cases/ Pending Cases, ICCWBO.org] Retrieved 14 May 2013</ref>
 
==GAC Early Warning==
The applications from [[Famous Four Media]] and [[Donuts]] were both issued a [[GAC]] Early Warning by the United Kingdom. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the [[ICANN Board]] that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/gac-early-warning GAC Early Warning, NewgTLDS.ICANN.org] Retrieved 27 Nov 2012</ref>
 
The warnings state that the application submitted in conjunction with the [[International Rugby Board]], which is the largest, officially recognized governing body for the sport, should by given priority about the other two applications. It notes that while the application was not submitted as a [[Community TLD|Community Priority Application]], it is a Community TLD, if not technically so under ICANN's rules. It recommends that the other two applicants withdraw their applications.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Rugby-UK-2805.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353453351000 Rugby UK, GACweb.ICANN.org]</ref><ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Rugby-UK-66762.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353453363000 Rugby UK, GACweb.ICANN.org]</ref>
 
In correspondence detailed below, between [[ROAR Domains]] and [[Donuts]], the former boasted that it had recieved 4 GAC Early Warnings, including this correspondence by the U.K.<ref name="Donuts Letter">[http://www.donuts.co/images/stories/donuts_reply_to_uk_early_warning.pdf Donuts Reply to UK Early Warning]Published and Retrieved 10 Jan 2013</ref>
 
===Donuts Responds===
Donuts responded via [[Jon Nevett]] in a written letter to the U.K. GAC representative that it later made public on its website. It argues that it would be a better steward of [[.rugby]] as it has no vested interested other than in the health and security of the [[TLD]], and not in the rugby related content. They note that ROAR Domains seems to essentially be seeking community status even though it did not choose to apply as a [[Community TLD|community applicant]]. It further notes that it believes their threats that they will file objections in an effort to see their competition, including Donuts, thrown out. Mr. Nevett notes that he understands the logic and looks forward to a debate about what constitutes a legitimate objection. Lastly, Jon emphasizes that it is not up to governments to pick winning and losing applications for gTLDs, despite the fact that [[ROAR Domains]] and its partners seem to hope they can do exactly this.
 
The full Donuts response can be seen [http://www.donuts.co/images/stories/donuts_reply_to_uk_early_warning.pdf here].
 
==ROAR Domains v. Competition==
In January 2013, [[Donuts]] published correspondence showing that [[ROAR Domains]], which is in partnership with [[Top Level Domains Holding Ltd.]] and has the backing of the [[International Rugby Board]], has been actively seeking ways to intimidate and see its competition disqualified from the string. This is in regards to both its .rugby and its [[.basketball]] bid, for which it has the backing of the [[FIBA|International Basketball Federation]], both are contested by portfolio-applicant [[Donuts]]. Thus, they are apparently pushing for [[Donuts]] to be disqualified outright from the [[New gTLD Program]]. Such criticism of Donuts have previously been based on allegations about poor domaining practice, such as claims that Donuts co-founder [[Paul Stahura]] was involved with an excessive amount of [[UDRP]] cases with his former company, [[eNom]]. ROAR Domains wrote to Donuts, saying, "while we have no desire to join the chorus of voices speaking out against Donuts, it is incumbent on us to pursue the automatic disqualification of Applicant Guidebook Section 1.2.1, and every opposition and objection process available to us." Section 1.2.1 focuses on the applicant background check. Additionally, the [[International Rugby Board]] wrote to Donuts, saying,  "As the global representative of the sport and the only applicant vested with the trust and representation of the rugby community, we are unquestionably the rightful steward of .RUGBY.… Without the support of the global rugby community your commercialization efforts for .RUGBY will be thwarted. We are also preparing an objection to file against your application in accordance with ICANN rules to which you will be required to dedicate resources to formulate a response."<ref name="Donuts Letter"></ref>
 
ROAR seemingly also boasted about obtaining 4 GAC warnings on behalf of its applications and noted that the complaints should see their way through to official GAC Advice.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/11545-fight-over-new-sports-gtlds-gets-real-ugly Fight Over New Sports gTLDs Gets Real Ugly, DomainIncite.com]Published and Retrieved 10 Jan 2013</ref>


==Community Objection==
The IRB filed [[Community Objection]]s against the other two applicants. The objections were merged into a single case and decided by [[ICC]] panelist [[Mark Kantor]]. The panelist decided in favor of the IRB, therefore forcing Donuts and Famous Four Media out of the contention set.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2014/02/04/donuts-and-famous-four-lose-rugby-domain-name-match/ Donuts and Famous Four Lose .rugby Match, DomainNameWire] Retrieved 04 Feb 2014</ref>
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}

Latest revision as of 19:08, 7 May 2024

Status: proposed
Type: gTLD
Category: Sport
Priority #: 278 - International Rugby Board
400 - Donuts (Atomic Cross, LLC)
1322 - Famous Four Media (dot Rugby Limited)

More information:

.rugby is new generic top level domain name (gTLD) proposal for the rugby sports community to ICANN's New gTLD Program.

The International Rugby Board (IRB), rugby's governing federation made up of 118 IRB member countries representing more than 5.5 million registered players across all continents, released a press release stating that the application submitted by IRB Strategic Developments Limited is the only rugby application supported by the international rugby community. The application was founded on a mandate by the Board, and the Board seeks to ensure that the TLD is restricted, used in the best interests of the game of rugby and the rugby community.[1]

A Community Objection by the IRB against the other two applicants was decided in favor of the IRB, thus removing Donuts and Famous Four Media from the contention set.

Current Applicants[edit | edit source]

  1. Top Level Domain Holdings Ltd. & The International Rugby Board (IRB), in partnership with ROAR Domains are applying for the TLD. Minds + Machines has been selected by the organization to provide the back-end registry services. IRB's objectives in applying for the TLD are to serve the interest of the global rugby stakeholders, to promote the sport and its values and to protect its trademarks.[2] [3] [4] The applicant has filed a Public Interest Commitment, which can be downloaded here.

Previous Applicants[edit | edit source]

  1. Famous Four Media (dot Rugby Limited), one of 61 applications filed by the company. The applicant has filed a Public Interest Commitment, which can be downloaded here. The International Rugby Board filed a Community Objection against this application.[5]
  2. Donuts (Atomic Cross, LLC), one of 307 applications filed by the company. The applicant has filed a public Interest Commitment, which can be downloaded here. The International Ruby Board filed a Community Objection against this application.[6]

GAC Early Warning[edit | edit source]

The applications from Famous Four Media and Donuts were both issued a GAC Early Warning by the United Kingdom. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the ICANN Board that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.[7]

The warnings state that the application submitted in conjunction with the International Rugby Board, which is the largest, officially recognized governing body for the sport, should by given priority about the other two applications. It notes that while the application was not submitted as a Community Priority Application, it is a Community TLD, if not technically so under ICANN's rules. It recommends that the other two applicants withdraw their applications.[8][9]

In correspondence detailed below, between ROAR Domains and Donuts, the former boasted that it had recieved 4 GAC Early Warnings, including this correspondence by the U.K.[10]

Donuts Responds[edit | edit source]

Donuts responded via Jon Nevett in a written letter to the U.K. GAC representative that it later made public on its website. It argues that it would be a better steward of .rugby as it has no vested interested other than in the health and security of the TLD, and not in the rugby related content. They note that ROAR Domains seems to essentially be seeking community status even though it did not choose to apply as a community applicant. It further notes that it believes their threats that they will file objections in an effort to see their competition, including Donuts, thrown out. Mr. Nevett notes that he understands the logic and looks forward to a debate about what constitutes a legitimate objection. Lastly, Jon emphasizes that it is not up to governments to pick winning and losing applications for gTLDs, despite the fact that ROAR Domains and its partners seem to hope they can do exactly this.

The full Donuts response can be seen here.

ROAR Domains v. Competition[edit | edit source]

In January 2013, Donuts published correspondence showing that ROAR Domains, which is in partnership with Top Level Domains Holding Ltd. and has the backing of the International Rugby Board, has been actively seeking ways to intimidate and see its competition disqualified from the string. This is in regards to both its .rugby and its .basketball bid, for which it has the backing of the International Basketball Federation, both are contested by portfolio-applicant Donuts. Thus, they are apparently pushing for Donuts to be disqualified outright from the New gTLD Program. Such criticism of Donuts have previously been based on allegations about poor domaining practice, such as claims that Donuts co-founder Paul Stahura was involved with an excessive amount of UDRP cases with his former company, eNom. ROAR Domains wrote to Donuts, saying, "while we have no desire to join the chorus of voices speaking out against Donuts, it is incumbent on us to pursue the automatic disqualification of Applicant Guidebook Section 1.2.1, and every opposition and objection process available to us." Section 1.2.1 focuses on the applicant background check. Additionally, the International Rugby Board wrote to Donuts, saying, "As the global representative of the sport and the only applicant vested with the trust and representation of the rugby community, we are unquestionably the rightful steward of .RUGBY.… Without the support of the global rugby community your commercialization efforts for .RUGBY will be thwarted. We are also preparing an objection to file against your application in accordance with ICANN rules to which you will be required to dedicate resources to formulate a response."[10]

ROAR seemingly also boasted about obtaining 4 GAC warnings on behalf of its applications and noted that the complaints should see their way through to official GAC Advice.[11]

Community Objection[edit | edit source]

The IRB filed Community Objections against the other two applicants. The objections were merged into a single case and decided by ICC panelist Mark Kantor. The panelist decided in favor of the IRB, therefore forcing Donuts and Famous Four Media out of the contention set.[12]

References[edit | edit source]