Jump to content

Geographic Names Panel: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
Jessica (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
14,952 edits
 
(6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Geographic Names Panel''' is one of multiple panels that are involved in [[ICANN]]'s initial evaluation process for [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD]]s. It is responsible for determining if the proposed new gTLD represents a geographic name (country or territory name, sub-national geographic name, city name, continent or UN Region) under the standards set forth by [[Applicant Guidebook]]. The panel will also evaluate if the geographic name being applied for needs government support and ensures that the supporting documentations from government authorities included in the application are verified and original.<ref>[http://www.new-gtld.ch/faq.php What are the evaluation panels?]</ref> <ref>
The '''Geographic Names Panel''' is one of multiple panels that are involved in [[ICANN]]'s initial evaluation process for [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD]]s. It is responsible for determining if the proposed new gTLD represents a geographic name (country or territory name, sub-national geographic name, city name, continent or UN Region) under the standards set forth by [[Applicant Guidebook]]. The panel will also evaluate if the geographic name being applied for requires government support and ensures that the supporting documents from government authorities included in the application are verified and original.<ref>[http://www.new-gtld.ch/faq.php What are the evaluation panels?]</ref> <ref>
[http://archive.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/geographic-names-22oct08-en.pdf Proposed Process for Geographic Name Applications]</ref>
[http://archive.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/geographic-names-22oct08-en.pdf Proposed Process for Geographic Name Applications]</ref>


The [[Economist Intelligence Unit]] and [[InterConnect Communications]], in partnership with the University College London, were selected to make up the Geographic Names Panel in November, 2011.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/blog/preparing-evaluators-22nov11-en Preparing Evaluators for the New gTLD Application Process]</ref>
The [[Economist Intelligence Unit]] and [[InterConnect Communications]], in partnership with the University College London, were selected to make up the Geographic Names Panel in November, 2011.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/blog/preparing-evaluators-22nov11-en Preparing Evaluators for the New gTLD Application Process]</ref>


==Related Panels==
It was predicted that the Geographic Names Panel would be able to finish its evaluation ahead of many of the other panels, finishing on or around November 12, 2012.<ref>[http://www.gtld.com/news/2012/icanns-new-gtld-program-latest-news ICANN new gTLD Program Latest News, www.gtld.com]</ref>
Other Panels and evaluations involved in the Initial Evaluation Process:<ref>[http://www.gtld.com/news/2012/closer-look-new-gtld-evaluation-program Closer Look New gTLD Evaluation Program, gTLD.com]</ref>
===Google Violates Geographic Rules===
* [[Financial Evaluation Panel]]
It was quickly noted following the public reveal that [[Google]] had applied for three strings that were clearly in violation of the protection of geographic territory names as per the [[ISO-3166]] standards. Their applications for [[.and]], [[.are]], and [[.est]] are all protected names on that list, for Andorra, the United Arab Emirates, and Estonia respectively. .and was intended for use as a [[Brand TLD]] for Google's android services, while .est and .are were intended as "domain hacks", so domains such as cats.are/best and fast.est/car would be made possible.<ref>[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/02/google_loses_money_applying_for_banned_domain_names/ Google Loses Money Applying for Banned Domain Names, TheRegister.co.uk]</ref> These applications were later withdrawn, though a full-refund was not given.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/10089-did-google-withdraw-three-new-gtld-applications Did Google Withdraw Three New gTLD Applications, DomainIncite.com]</ref>
* [[Technical Evaluation Panel]]
* [[DNS Stability Panel]]
* [[String Similarity Panel]]
* [[Comparative Evaluation Panel]]


===Rulings===
On March 7th 2013, it was announced that the following strings refer to geographic areas but did not apply as geoTLDs: [[.bar]], [[.tata]], [[.tui]]; while the following strings applied for as geographic but do not actually refer to a geographic area: [[.ist]], [[.ryukyu]], [[.scot]], [[.vegas]], [[.frl]], [[.zulu]]. [[Kevin Murphy]], of [[Domain Incite]], noted that other TLDs referring to known geographic areas were not singled out, including: [[.capital]], [[.delta]].<ref>[http://domainincite.com/12166-told-you-so-four-new-gtlds-given-geographic-surprise-others-given-a-pass Told You So Four New gTLDs Given Geographic Surprise , DomainIncite.com] Published & Retrieved 7 Mar 2013</ref>
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
Line 17: Line 15:


[[Category:Glossary]]
[[Category:Glossary]]
__NOTOC__

Latest revision as of 18:35, 15 February 2021

The Geographic Names Panel is one of multiple panels that are involved in ICANN's initial evaluation process for new gTLDs. It is responsible for determining if the proposed new gTLD represents a geographic name (country or territory name, sub-national geographic name, city name, continent or UN Region) under the standards set forth by Applicant Guidebook. The panel will also evaluate if the geographic name being applied for requires government support and ensures that the supporting documents from government authorities included in the application are verified and original.[1] [2]

The Economist Intelligence Unit and InterConnect Communications, in partnership with the University College London, were selected to make up the Geographic Names Panel in November, 2011.[3]

It was predicted that the Geographic Names Panel would be able to finish its evaluation ahead of many of the other panels, finishing on or around November 12, 2012.[4]

Google Violates Geographic Rules

It was quickly noted following the public reveal that Google had applied for three strings that were clearly in violation of the protection of geographic territory names as per the ISO-3166 standards. Their applications for .and, .are, and .est are all protected names on that list, for Andorra, the United Arab Emirates, and Estonia respectively. .and was intended for use as a Brand TLD for Google's android services, while .est and .are were intended as "domain hacks", so domains such as cats.are/best and fast.est/car would be made possible.[5] These applications were later withdrawn, though a full-refund was not given.[6]

Rulings

On March 7th 2013, it was announced that the following strings refer to geographic areas but did not apply as geoTLDs: .bar, .tata, .tui; while the following strings applied for as geographic but do not actually refer to a geographic area: .ist, .ryukyu, .scot, .vegas, .frl, .zulu. Kevin Murphy, of Domain Incite, noted that other TLDs referring to known geographic areas were not singled out, including: .capital, .delta.[7]

References

Retrieved from "https://icannwiki.org/index.php?title=Geographic_Names_Panel&oldid=1304344"