Difference between revisions of "Talk:Meta:ICANNWiki Development"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Questions about list: Answers) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
; Fix "CiteThisPage" extension: | ; Fix "CiteThisPage" extension: | ||
:I don't know what is needed here. Can you point me to an example? | :I don't know what is needed here. Can you point me to an example? | ||
| + | ::[[File:Icannwiki-citation-example.png|600px|frameless]] | ||
; Improve metadata for external links to ICANNWiki | ; Improve metadata for external links to ICANNWiki | ||
: I confess I don't know what sort of rich metadata you want. I'm vaguely aware of some SEO stuff, but I am not aware of "best practices" in this area. | : I confess I don't know what sort of rich metadata you want. I'm vaguely aware of some SEO stuff, but I am not aware of "best practices" in this area. | ||
| + | ::Essentially, we are not surfacing any metadata for modern applications, as seen in the example below. That is done via Open Graph Meta Tags, and in the very least we should be sending a ''meta property="og:image"'' with a generic ICANNWiki banner, ''meta name="description"'' with a blurb containing the article's lead, and send our logo via ''mstile'', ''apple-touch-icon'', ''android-chrome'' and so on. A straightforward solution seems to be [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:OpenGraphMeta]. | ||
| + | ::[[File:Icannwiki-external-example.png|600px|frameless]] | ||
; Add dark theme | ; Add dark theme | ||
: From the provided [[mediawikiwiki:Manual:Dark mode|Manual:Dark mode]] link, it looks like I should switch the skin to Vector 2022 or Minerva. | : From the provided [[mediawikiwiki:Manual:Dark mode|Manual:Dark mode]] link, it looks like I should switch the skin to Vector 2022 or Minerva. | ||
| + | ::That would be incredibly useful. | ||
; Check parsing of desirable functions in Templates | ; Check parsing of desirable functions in Templates | ||
: Could you clarify which pages are causing you trouble here. | : Could you clarify which pages are causing you trouble here. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
: I need an example | : I need an example | ||
| + | ::I myself need to document this better. Some functions simply weren't working as I was trying them. As soon as we upgrade this instance's version, I'll re-check. --[[User:MarkWD|MD]] ([[User talk:MarkWD|talk]]) 20:09, 27 August 2024 (UTC) | ||
--[[User:MarkAHershberger|MarkAHershberger]] ([[User talk:MarkAHershberger|talk]]) 20:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC) | --[[User:MarkAHershberger|MarkAHershberger]] ([[User talk:MarkAHershberger|talk]]) 20:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:09, 27 August 2024
Questions about list
For @MarkWD
- Fix "CiteThisPage" extension
- I don't know what is needed here. Can you point me to an example?
- Improve metadata for external links to ICANNWiki
- I confess I don't know what sort of rich metadata you want. I'm vaguely aware of some SEO stuff, but I am not aware of "best practices" in this area.
- Essentially, we are not surfacing any metadata for modern applications, as seen in the example below. That is done via Open Graph Meta Tags, and in the very least we should be sending a meta property="og:image" with a generic ICANNWiki banner, meta name="description" with a blurb containing the article's lead, and send our logo via mstile, apple-touch-icon, android-chrome and so on. A straightforward solution seems to be [1].
- Add dark theme
- From the provided Manual:Dark mode link, it looks like I should switch the skin to Vector 2022 or Minerva.
- That would be incredibly useful.
- Check parsing of desirable functions in Templates
- Could you clarify which pages are causing you trouble here.
- I need an example
--MarkAHershberger (talk) 20:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)