ISPs and Connectivity Providers Constituency: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:UnderConstruction.png]] | [[Image:UnderConstruction.png]] | ||
'''ISPCP (ISPs and Connectivity Providers) Constituency''' is part of the Generic Name Supporting Organization (GNSO). Its primary role is to fulfill roles and responsibilities set forth by the [[ICANN]] and GNSO Bylaws, rules | '''ISPCP (ISPs and Connectivity Providers) Constituency''' is part of the Generic Name Supporting Organization (GNSO). Its primary role is to fulfill roles and responsibilities set forth by the [[ICANN]] and GNSO Bylaws, rules, policies and activities. It was constituted by the [[ICANN Board]] on October 18, 1999. | ||
==Responsibilities== | ==Responsibilities== | ||
ISPCP Constituency is expected to effectively represent the views and interest of the internet service providers ensure that the needs and concers of the [[ISP]]s are balance with the public interest and elect three member representatives to the Names Council and one representative to the ICANN Nominating Committee. ISPCP is committed in maintaining a wide range pf membershipship participation and transparency.<ref>[http://www.ispcp.info/about.html www.ispcp.info]</ref> | ISPCP Constituency is expected to effectively represent the views and interest of the internet service providers ensure that the needs and concers of the [[ISP]]s are balance with the public interest and elect three member representatives to the Names Council and one representative to the ICANN Nominating Committee. ISPCP is committed in maintaining a wide range pf membershipship participation and transparency.<ref>[http://www.ispcp.info/about.html www.ispcp.info]</ref> | ||
==Membership== | |||
The members of the ISPCP Constituency are entities that operate name servers to third parties or operators of internet backbone network based on TCP/IP and provide transit to either internet users or third party internet content.Internet service providers or connectivity networks may apply for membership with the constituency as long as they are able to demonstrate the activities of the [[GNSO]] has impact to their organization and show that they understand that the delegates appointed by the Constituency are expected to regularly participate in the Constituency's work, events and activities.<ref>[http://www.ispcp.info/abt-memb.html Membership]</ref> Currently ISPCP has 38 members which include [[ABRANET]], [[British Telecom]], [[CSL Deutsche Telecom]], [[Asimelec]], [[CAIP]], [[ETNO]] among others. | |||
==Executive Committee== | ==Executive Committee== | ||
| Line 15: | Line 18: | ||
===Staff=== | ===Staff=== | ||
Members of the Executive Committee include: | Members of the Executive Committee include: | ||
* [[Tony Holmes]], Chairman, BT (UK) | * [[Tony Holmes]], Chairman, [[BT]] (UK) | ||
* [[Tony Harris]], Deputy Chair, CABASE (Argentina) | * [[Tony Harris]], Deputy Chair, [[CABASE]] (Argentina) | ||
* [[Greg Ruth]], Deputy Chair, Verizon (US) | * [[Greg Ruth]], Deputy Chair, [[Verizon]] (US) | ||
* [[Alain Bidron]], France Telecom (France) | * [[Alain Bidron]], [[France Telecom]] (France) | ||
* [[Antonio Tavares]], ABRANET, (Brazil) | * [[Antonio Tavares]], [[ABRANET]], (Brazil) | ||
==ISPCP Statements on ICANN Policy Issues== | |||
The Constituency regularly provides comments or statements to ICANN Policy Issues by building and gathering internal consensus among its members. ISPCP statements on ICANN Policy Issues include: | |||
# The Constituency's response regarding the '''Staff Report on the Whois Implementation''', whereby the ISP community expressed their concern regarding the Operational Point of Contact ([[OPOC]]) proposal to reform the [[WHOis]]. ISPCP pointed out that potential changes on the WHOis will possibly hinder the activities and performance of the ISP community in a effectively and efficiently.<ref>[http://www.ispcp.info/stmt-whois2.pdf Statement on WHOis Staff Report]</ref> | |||
# Comments to the '''US Department of Commerce on [[ICANN]] Contract Renewal''' wherein the Constituency expressed their continued support to ICANN. They believed that the guiding principles of ICANN's DNS management such as stability, competition, private sector participation, bottom-up coordination and multi-stakeholder representation are relevant and critical for the global internet community. According to them, the recent re-organization of ICANN demonstrated progress and it was able to meet the goals set forth by the [[White Paper]]. ICANN satisfactorily met its primary tasks and milestones based on the MOU with the Department of Commerce.The internet has grown rapidly and [[IANA]]'s services has improved and became more professional. Furthermore, ISP community recommended the establishment of a new and clear timetable for ICANN"s systematic and orderly transition towards private sector management and they also emphasized effective staffing of IANA and ICANN's [[ccTLD]] liaisons are significant to address the concerns and issues of ccTLD they believed that focusing on technology tools to address the root management is often over emphasized.<ref>[http://www.ispcp.info/stmt-doc.pdf Department of Commerce NTIA Docket 06051936-6136-01]</ref> | |||
# Position on New [[gTLD]] Expansion- The Constituency emphasized that an informed discussion is required regarding the need of the internet community for new gTLDs and the establishment of guidelines for the implementation of new gTLDs.<ref>[http://www.ispcp.info/stmt-ntd.pdf ISPCP Position on New gTLD Expansion]</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||