Messaging Malware Mobile Anti-Abuse Working Group: Difference between revisions
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
* '''ICANN Whois Review Team'''- MAAWAG recommended that ICANN should require registries to adopt the "thick" [[Whois]] Service to be able to provide reliable service and standardized report formats. The organization is against the proposal that only law enforcement agencies are allowed to have access to the Whois database and suggested that the accuracy and reliability of the Whois service should be maintained.In addition, MAAWAG encouraged ICANN to provide a quarterly summary report on the volume of inaccuracy incident reports received through the '''WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System (WDPRS)''' and encouraged the Whois Review Team to include technological improvements on the Whois service.<ref>[http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_ICANN_WHOIS_Review_2011-04.pdf Comments on Whois Review Team]</ref> | * '''ICANN Whois Review Team'''- MAAWAG recommended that ICANN should require registries to adopt the "thick" [[Whois]] Service to be able to provide reliable service and standardized report formats. The organization is against the proposal that only law enforcement agencies are allowed to have access to the Whois database and suggested that the accuracy and reliability of the Whois service should be maintained.In addition, MAAWAG encouraged ICANN to provide a quarterly summary report on the volume of inaccuracy incident reports received through the '''WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System (WDPRS)''' and encouraged the Whois Review Team to include technological improvements on the Whois service.<ref>[http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_ICANN_WHOIS_Review_2011-04.pdf Comments on Whois Review Team]</ref> | ||
* '''ICANN’s Draft FY2012 Budget''' | * '''ICANN’s Draft FY2012 Budget''' | ||
MAAWAG reviewed the proposed ICANN budget for fiscal year 2012 and emphasized that the organization commended the global internet governing body's budget allocation on important areas as its priority such as:<ref> | |||
[http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_ICANN_Budget_Comments-2011-06.pdf Comments on ICANN’s Draft FY2012 Budget]</ref> | |||
# Registrar Oversight | |||
# Whois Operation and Usability | |||
# Scalable access to zone file data given the imminent addition of new gTLDs | |||
# Cooperation with law enforcement, government regulators, and non-governmental organizations to prevent or respond to cybercrime and Internet abuse | |||
The organizations also observed that | |||
==Senior Technical Advisors== | ==Senior Technical Advisors== | ||