Coalition for Responsible Internet Domain Oversight: Difference between revisions
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
* standing registry operator obligations in the registry | * standing registry operator obligations in the registry | ||
agreement | agreement | ||
He also criticized Liodice's allegations that the new gTLD program will result to "enormous financial burdens" and argued that the quotations he used from the economic studies were biased with unsupported conclusions that more domain names will be exposed to heightened cyber security attacks and violations of consumer privacy. He explained that ICANN formed a team of international experts who developed innovative safeguards against trademark abuses and malicious internet practices. In addition, the concerns of [[Intellectual Property]] stakeholders were well documented and the ICANN Board created a team of 18 IP experts, the [[Implementation Recommendation Team|IRT | He also criticized Liodice's allegations that the new gTLD program will result to "enormous financial burdens" and argued that the quotations he used from the economic studies were biased with unsupported conclusions that more domain names will be exposed to heightened cyber security attacks and violations of consumer privacy. He explained that ICANN formed a team of international experts who developed innovative safeguards against trademark abuses and malicious internet practices. In addition, the concerns of [[Intellectual Property]] stakeholders were well documented and the ICANN Board created a team of 18 IP experts, the [[Implementation Recommendation Team|IRT]] to create additional Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) such as: | ||
* Creation of a Trademark Clearing House | * Creation of a Trademark Clearing House | ||
* Implementation of the Uniform Rapid Suspension ([[URS]]) | * Implementation of the Uniform Rapid Suspension ([[URS]]) | ||