Manwin Licensing: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
==Legal Battle== | ==Legal Battle== | ||
On November 15, 2011, Manwin and Digital Playground filed a anti-trust lawsuit against [[ICM Registry]] and [[ICANN]]. The company claims that ICM and ICANN conducted anti-competitive, monopolistic conduct, price gouging and unfair practices. The complainants asked the court to issue and injunction order on the [[.xxx]] [[TLD]], order ICANN to open a re-bidding process for the TLD and require price constraints to ICM. The legal charges was filed at the United States Central District Court of California.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/youporn-sues-icann-and-icm-over-xxx/ YouPorn sues ICANN and ICM over .xxx]</ref> Following the lawsuit, Manwin also requested the [[ICDR|International Centre for Dispute Resolution]] to conduct an Independent Review Proceedings ([[IRP]]) against ICANN.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/irp/manwin-v-icann/notice-of-independent-review-16nov11-en.pdf Notice of Independent Review]</ref> <ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/irp/manwin-v-icann/request-for-independent-review-16nov11-en.pdf Request for IRP]</ref> | On November 15, 2011, Manwin and Digital Playground filed a anti-trust lawsuit against [[ICM Registry]] and [[ICANN]]. The company claims that ICM and ICANN conducted anti-competitive, monopolistic conduct, price gouging and unfair practices. The complainants asked the court to issue and injunction order on the [[.xxx]] [[TLD]], order ICANN to open a re-bidding process for the TLD and to require price constraints to ICM. The legal charges was filed at the United States Central District Court of California.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/youporn-sues-icann-and-icm-over-xxx/ YouPorn sues ICANN and ICM over .xxx]</ref> Following the lawsuit, Manwin also requested the [[ICDR|International Centre for Dispute Resolution]] to conduct an Independent Review Proceedings ([[IRP]]) against ICANN.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/irp/manwin-v-icann/notice-of-independent-review-16nov11-en.pdf Notice of Independent Review]</ref> <ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/irp/manwin-v-icann/request-for-independent-review-16nov11-en.pdf Request for IRP]</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 04:16, 10 January 2012
 | |
| Type: | Privately held |
| Industry: | Information Technology |
| Founded: | 2007 |
| Founder(s): | Fabian Thylmann |
| Headquarters: | Luxembourg City |
| Country: | Luxembourg |
| Employees: | 700 |
| Email: | info[at]manwin.com |
| Website: | www.manwin.com |
| Key People | |
| Fabian Thylmann,Founder & Managing Partner | |
Manwin is an information technology and licensing company which and operates adult oriented trademarks and websites. The company's main office is located in Luxembourg with offices located in Hamburg, London, Los Angeles, Nicosia, and Montreal.
Background edit
Manwin was founded by Fabian Thylmann, a geek from Germany who specializes in search engine optimization. He started developing codes for porn sites at the age of 17. Thylmann learned that porn sites gain high web traffic with good profitability so he started acquiring small adult entertainment sites such as PrivatAmateure, MyDirtyHobby, XTube and Brazzers. Manwin became the official name of the company when it expanded and acquired several porn sites for over 140 million. [1] [2] [3]
On November 2011, Manwinn entered a partnership agreement with Playboy Enterprises, Inc. to manage the operations of Playboy TV worldwide including its non-branded adult television and online businesses.[4] During the same month, the company also introduced Legendary Stats, an affiliate aggregation product website which allows users to access all of Manwin's products using one log-in.[5]
Services edit
The company provides the following solutions to its customers:[6]
- Web Application Development
- Search Engine Optimization
- Customer Relationship Management
- Website Optimization
- Business Intelligence
Legal Battle edit
On November 15, 2011, Manwin and Digital Playground filed a anti-trust lawsuit against ICM Registry and ICANN. The company claims that ICM and ICANN conducted anti-competitive, monopolistic conduct, price gouging and unfair practices. The complainants asked the court to issue and injunction order on the .xxx TLD, order ICANN to open a re-bidding process for the TLD and to require price constraints to ICM. The legal charges was filed at the United States Central District Court of California.[7] Following the lawsuit, Manwin also requested the International Centre for Dispute Resolution to conduct an Independent Review Proceedings (IRP) against ICANN.[8] [9]