Jump to content

.world: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
Marie Cabural (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
==Current Applicants==
==Current Applicants==
#[[Donuts (Bitter Fields, LLC)]]
#[[Donuts (Bitter Fields, LLC)]]
#[[Radix (DotWorld Inc.)]]<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus World Status, ICANN.org]</ref>
#[[Radix]] (DotWorld Inc.)<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus World Status, ICANN.org]</ref>
 
===Radix===
Radix received a [[GAC]] Early Warning as an entire applicant, where each one of the applicants was flagged by the U.S. Government. This seems to be the only time a portfolio applicant had all of their applications warned. The issue does not deal with the technical capabilities or thematic content of their applications, but rather the inclusion of an email address associated with the US' Federal Bureau of Investigation. It seems that Radix included correspondence with this address as a recommendation with each of their applications.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/RadixReg-US-31.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353452704000 RadixReg. GACweb.ICANN.org] Retrieved 27 Nov 2012</ref>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 21:19, 27 November 2012

Status: Proposed
country: International
Type: Generic
Category: Culture

More information:

.world is a proposed gTLD in ICANN's new gTLD program.

Current Applicants

  1. Donuts (Bitter Fields, LLC)
  2. Radix (DotWorld Inc.)[1]

Radix

Radix received a GAC Early Warning as an entire applicant, where each one of the applicants was flagged by the U.S. Government. This seems to be the only time a portfolio applicant had all of their applications warned. The issue does not deal with the technical capabilities or thematic content of their applications, but rather the inclusion of an email address associated with the US' Federal Bureau of Investigation. It seems that Radix included correspondence with this address as a recommendation with each of their applications.[2]

References