Jump to content

DNS Security Facilitation - Technical Study Group: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Jessica (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
14,952 edits
Jessica (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
14,952 edits
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''DNS Security Facilitation - Technical Study Group''' ('''DSFI-TSG''') was formed to investigate and determine what ICANN should and should not do based on the technical landscape -- not about [[DNS Abuse]] -- but about security threats and attack vectors, including the DNS itself.
The '''DNS Security Facilitation - Technical Study Group''' ('''DSFI-TSG''') was formed to investigate and determine what ICANN should and should not do based on the technical landscape -- not about [[DNS Abuse]] -- but about security threats and attack vectors, including the DNS itself. This study group provides technical guidance to the ICANN CEO on what ICANN can initiate to facilitate DNS security.<ref>[DSFTSG Charter]</ref> This group does not make policy but it may make policy recommendations.
==Members==
* [[Merike Käo]] (Coordinator)
* [[Tim April]]
* [[Gavin Brown]]
* [[John Crain]]
* [[Rod Rasmussen]]
* [[Marc Rogers]]
* [[Katrina Sataki]]
* [[Robert Schischka]]
* [[Duane Wessels]]
 
==Guiding Questions==
# Which ICANN mechanisms or functions specifically address DNS security?<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/DSFI/Project+Charter+and+Scope?preview=/136119336/146736288/DSFI%20Technical%20Study%20Group%20Charter.pdf DSFTSG Charter]</ref>
# What are the most critical gaps in the DNS security landscape?
# what technical requirements are needed to fill the gaps?
# How to fix operational best practices to address the gaps?
# What are the hindrances to their deployments?
# Who should fill those gaps?
# what is [[ICANN Organization]]'s role?
# What strategic partnerships should ICANN org make to enhance DNS security?
# What are the risks?
# What are the shortcomings of the current threat models?
# What are the externalities?
# which DNS characteristics attract security problems that other Internet services don’t have?
# What can ICANN learn from other protocols or industries that face similar issues?
 
==References==

Revision as of 15:05, 1 October 2021

The DNS Security Facilitation - Technical Study Group (DSFI-TSG) was formed to investigate and determine what ICANN should and should not do based on the technical landscape -- not about DNS Abuse -- but about security threats and attack vectors, including the DNS itself. This study group provides technical guidance to the ICANN CEO on what ICANN can initiate to facilitate DNS security.[1] This group does not make policy but it may make policy recommendations.

Members

Guiding Questions

  1. Which ICANN mechanisms or functions specifically address DNS security?[2]
  2. What are the most critical gaps in the DNS security landscape?
  3. what technical requirements are needed to fill the gaps?
  4. How to fix operational best practices to address the gaps?
  5. What are the hindrances to their deployments?
  6. Who should fill those gaps?
  7. what is ICANN Organization's role?
  8. What strategic partnerships should ICANN org make to enhance DNS security?
  9. What are the risks?
  10. What are the shortcomings of the current threat models?
  11. What are the externalities?
  12. which DNS characteristics attract security problems that other Internet services don’t have?
  13. What can ICANN learn from other protocols or industries that face similar issues?

References

  1. ↑ [DSFTSG Charter]
  2. ↑ DSFTSG Charter
Retrieved from "https://icannwiki.org/index.php?title=DNS_Security_Facilitation_-_Technical_Study_Group&oldid=1340370"