Jump to content

.shop: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Dustin Loup (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, lookupuser, staff, Administrators, translator
11,770 edits
updated auction details
Jessica (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
14,952 edits
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
|keypeople  =
|keypeople  =
}}
}}
'''.shop''' is a proposed new [[gTLD]] in [[ICANN]]'s new [[gTLD]] program.  
'''.shop''' is a [[gTLD]] from [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program]] operated by [[GMO Registry]]. On July 16, 2021, .SHOP hit one million active domains, including netflix.shop.<ref>[https://www.gmoregistry.com/en/ GMO Registry News] Accessed July 6, 2022</ref>


==Auction Results==
==Auction Results==
On 28 January 2016, [[GMO Registry]] won rights to own the .shop gTLD for $41.5 million in an [[ICANN auction]], outbidding all other applicants. At the time of the auction, this was the most expensive reported auction in the history of the [[New gTLD Program]].<ref>[http://domainincite.com/19886-shop-gtld-sells-for-record-41-5-million]</ref>
On 28 January 2016, [[GMO Registry]] won rights to own the .shop gTLD for $41.5 million in an [[ICANN auction]], outbidding all other applicants. At the time of the auction, this was the most expensive reported auction in the history of the [[New gTLD Program]].<ref>[http://domainincite.com/19886-shop-gtld-sells-for-record-41-5-million]</ref>


==Current Applicants==
==History of Applicants==
# [[GMO Registry]] ([[Community gTLD|Community Application]], the company has sponsored [[ICANN]] events using the .shop brand.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/nrf-director-joins-shop-applicant/ NRF Director Joins Shop Applicant, DomainIncite.com]</ref> the company has applied for both community and non-community status. The latter option is likely a back-up measure in case their community status application fails.
# [[GMO Registry]] ([[Community gTLD|Community Application]], the company has sponsored [[ICANN]] events using the .shop brand.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/nrf-director-joins-shop-applicant/ NRF Director Joins Shop Applicant, DomainIncite.com]</ref> the company has applied for both community and non-community status. The latter option is likely a back-up measure in case their community status application fails.
# [[GMO Registry]] (Standard Application), one of two applications filed by GMO for .shop.
# [[GMO Registry]] (Standard Application), one of two applications filed by GMO for .shop.
Line 36: Line 36:
Radix received a [[GAC]] Early Warning as an entire applicant, where each one of the applicants was flagged by the U.S. Government. This seems to be the only time a portfolio applicant had all of their applications warned. The issue does not deal with the technical capabilities or thematic content of their applications, but rather the inclusion of an email address associated with the US' Federal Bureau of Investigation. It seems that Radix included correspondence with this address as a recommendation with each of their applications.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/RadixReg-US-31.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353452704000 RadixReg. GACweb.ICANN.org] Retrieved 27 Nov 2012</ref>
Radix received a [[GAC]] Early Warning as an entire applicant, where each one of the applicants was flagged by the U.S. Government. This seems to be the only time a portfolio applicant had all of their applications warned. The issue does not deal with the technical capabilities or thematic content of their applications, but rather the inclusion of an email address associated with the US' Federal Bureau of Investigation. It seems that Radix included correspondence with this address as a recommendation with each of their applications.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/RadixReg-US-31.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353452704000 RadixReg. GACweb.ICANN.org] Retrieved 27 Nov 2012</ref>
===Community Application===
===Community Application===
There are two [[Community TLD|Community Priority Applications]] or .shop. One community priority applicant, [[GMO Registry]], also submitted a generic application in order to still have a chance at the TLD should they not be awarded the community designation. The other community applicant, [[Commercial Connect LLC]], submitted only the one community application.
There are two [[Community TLD|Community Priority Applications]] or .shop. One community priority applicant, [[GMO Registry]], also submitted a generic application in order to still have a chance at the TLD should they not be awarded the community designation. The other community applicant, [[Commercial Connect LLC]], submitted the only community application.


The application from [[Commercial Connect LLC]] defines its community as e-Commerce operators that run "B2C site[s] that utilize credit card processing requiring them to abide by PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards) to operate." The company notes that "We are the original applicant for .SHOP from the 2000 round.  While there were other applicants in the initial rounds, Commercial Connect was the only one that made it through the entire qualification process.  When delegation of .SHOP was put off until the ʺnextʺ round, CC has been working with the above community to establish its relationship and representation in that community. Initially, since there was no clear community representation, we worked on establishing some form of a member trade association.  The result was the creation of ECWR.net (eCommerce World Retailers).  This was formed in March, 2004 and clearly predates the 2007 requirement in the Applicant Guidebook.  We currently have in excess of 1,000 members representing a substantial amount of eCommerce (these members represent an equilivant in excess of $866 trillion in annual sales)."<ref>Application 1-1830-1672</ref>
The application from [[Commercial Connect LLC]] defines its community as e-Commerce operators that run "B2C site[s] that utilize credit card processing requiring them to abide by PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards) to operate." The company notes that "We are the original applicant for .SHOP from the 2000 round.  While there were other applicants in the initial rounds, Commercial Connect was the only one that made it through the entire qualification process.  When the delegation of .SHOP was put off until the ʺnextʺ round, CC has been working with the above community to establish its relationship and representation in that community. Initially, since there was no clear community representation, we worked on establishing some form of a member trade association.  The result was the creation of ECWR.net (eCommerce World Retailers).  This was formed in March 2004 and clearly predates the 2007 requirement in the Applicant Guidebook.  We currently have in excess of 1,000 members representing a substantial amount of eCommerce (in excess of $866 trillion in annual sales)."<ref>Application 1-1830-1672</ref>


The application by [[GMO Registry]] leaves greater room in its use of language for shops providing "offline" commerce services. Their application is supported by a few commerce associations, such as the European Multi-channel and Online Trade Association (EMOTA) and the Japan Foundation for Electronic Commerce (JFEC). There are not strong membership requirements delineated in the application.<ref>Application 1-890-52063</ref>
The application by [[GMO Registry]] left greater room in its use of language for shops providing "offline" commerce services. Their application was supported by a few commerce associations, such as the European Multi-channel and Online Trade Association (EMOTA) and the Japan Foundation for Electronic Commerce (JFEC). There are no strong membership requirements delineated in the application.<ref>Application 1-890-52063</ref>


==Sting Confusion Objection to [[.shopping]]==
==String Confusion Objection to [[.shopping]]==
.shop applicant [[Commercial Connect]] submitted an objection to [[Donuts]]' application for [[.shopping]] on the grounds that the two strings are confusingly similar and that Internet users might mistake the strings for one another. An [[ICDR]] panelist, Robert Nau, ruled in favor of [[Commercial Connect]], which may force [[Donuts]' application into a contention set along with all of the applicants for .shop. However, no objection was filed against [[Uniregistry]] for their application of [[.shopping]].<ref>[http://domainincite.com/14738-shopping-ruled-confusingly-similar-to-shop .shopping Ruled Confusingly Similar to .shop, Domain Incite] Retrieved 18 Oct 2013</ref> Nau was also the panelist who decided the case that found [[Amazon]]'s application for [[.通販]], which means "online shopping" in Chinese, to be confusingly similar to .shop. New gTLD applicant community members have expressed concern that the panelist chosen to decide certain objections has a major effect on the outcome of the objection.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2013/10/16/donuts-shopping-found-too-similar-to-shop-will-be-placed-in-contention-set/ Donuts' .shopping Found Too Similar to .shop, Domain Name Wire] Retrieved 18 Oct 2013</ref>
.shop applicant [[Commercial Connect]] submitted an objection to [[Donuts]]' application for [[.shopping]] on the grounds that the two strings are confusingly similar and that Internet users might mistake the strings for one another. An [[ICDR]] panelist, Robert Nau, ruled in favor of [[Commercial Connect]], which may force [[Donuts]' application into a contention set along with all of the applicants for .shop. However, no objection was filed against [[Uniregistry]] for their application of [[.shopping]].<ref>[http://domainincite.com/14738-shopping-ruled-confusingly-similar-to-shop .shopping Ruled Confusingly Similar to .shop, Domain Incite] Retrieved 18 Oct 2013</ref> Nau was also the panelist who decided the case that found [[Amazon]]'s application for [[.通販]], which means "online shopping" in Chinese, to be confusingly similar to .shop. New gTLD applicant community members have expressed concern that the panelist chosen to decide certain objections has a major effect on the outcome of the objection.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2013/10/16/donuts-shopping-found-too-similar-to-shop-will-be-placed-in-contention-set/ Donuts' .shopping Found Too Similar to .shop, Domain Name Wire] Retrieved 18 Oct 2013</ref>


Revision as of 16:07, 6 July 2022

Status: Proposed
country: International
Manager: GMO Registry,
Commercial Connect
Registry Provider: GMO Registry (GMO Registry bid)
Type: gTLD
Category: Commerce
Community TLD: No
More information:

.shop is a gTLD from ICANN's New gTLD Program operated by GMO Registry. On July 16, 2021, .SHOP hit one million active domains, including netflix.shop.[1]

Auction Results[edit | edit source]

On 28 January 2016, GMO Registry won rights to own the .shop gTLD for $41.5 million in an ICANN auction, outbidding all other applicants. At the time of the auction, this was the most expensive reported auction in the history of the New gTLD Program.[2]

History of Applicants[edit | edit source]

  1. GMO Registry (Community Application, the company has sponsored ICANN events using the .shop brand.[3] the company has applied for both community and non-community status. The latter option is likely a back-up measure in case their community status application fails.
  2. GMO Registry (Standard Application), one of two applications filed by GMO for .shop.
  3. Famous Four Media (Dot Shop Limited), one of 61 applications filed for new TLDs by the company.[4]
  4. Google (Charleston Road Registry Inc.)
  5. Radix (DotShop Inc.), one of 31 applications filed by the company.
  6. Donuts (Sugar Maple, LLC) - This applicant submitted a Public Interest Commitment, which can be downloaded here.
  7. Commercial Connect, Community Application, Originally applied for .shop in 2000 round and has continually worked with the eCommerce community to develop a strong mutually beneficial application for all stakeholders.[5]
  8. BEIJING JINGDONG 360 DU E-COMMERCE LTD
  9. Amazon - The Japan Association of New Economy (JANE) filed a community objection against this application.[6]

Amazon[edit | edit source]

Amazon's application was issued a GAC Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, Heather Dryden. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the ICANN Board that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.[7]

The warning states that the applicant is "seeking exclusive access to a common generic string .. that relates to a broad market sector," which Ms. Dryden notes could have unintended consequences and a negative impact on competition.[8]

Radix[edit | edit source]

Radix received a GAC Early Warning as an entire applicant, where each one of the applicants was flagged by the U.S. Government. This seems to be the only time a portfolio applicant had all of their applications warned. The issue does not deal with the technical capabilities or thematic content of their applications, but rather the inclusion of an email address associated with the US' Federal Bureau of Investigation. It seems that Radix included correspondence with this address as a recommendation with each of their applications.[9]

Community Application[edit | edit source]

There are two Community Priority Applications or .shop. One community priority applicant, GMO Registry, also submitted a generic application in order to still have a chance at the TLD should they not be awarded the community designation. The other community applicant, Commercial Connect LLC, submitted the only community application.

The application from Commercial Connect LLC defines its community as e-Commerce operators that run "B2C site[s] that utilize credit card processing requiring them to abide by PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards) to operate." The company notes that "We are the original applicant for .SHOP from the 2000 round. While there were other applicants in the initial rounds, Commercial Connect was the only one that made it through the entire qualification process. When the delegation of .SHOP was put off until the ʺnextʺ round, CC has been working with the above community to establish its relationship and representation in that community. Initially, since there was no clear community representation, we worked on establishing some form of a member trade association. The result was the creation of ECWR.net (eCommerce World Retailers). This was formed in March 2004 and clearly predates the 2007 requirement in the Applicant Guidebook. We currently have in excess of 1,000 members representing a substantial amount of eCommerce (in excess of $866 trillion in annual sales)."[10]

The application by GMO Registry left greater room in its use of language for shops providing "offline" commerce services. Their application was supported by a few commerce associations, such as the European Multi-channel and Online Trade Association (EMOTA) and the Japan Foundation for Electronic Commerce (JFEC). There are no strong membership requirements delineated in the application.[11]

String Confusion Objection to .shopping[edit | edit source]

.shop applicant Commercial Connect submitted an objection to Donuts' application for .shopping on the grounds that the two strings are confusingly similar and that Internet users might mistake the strings for one another. An ICDR panelist, Robert Nau, ruled in favor of Commercial Connect, which may force [[Donuts]' application into a contention set along with all of the applicants for .shop. However, no objection was filed against Uniregistry for their application of .shopping.[12] Nau was also the panelist who decided the case that found Amazon's application for .通販, which means "online shopping" in Chinese, to be confusingly similar to .shop. New gTLD applicant community members have expressed concern that the panelist chosen to decide certain objections has a major effect on the outcome of the objection.[13]

References[edit | edit source]

Governmental Advisory Committee. Considers and provides advice on the activities of ICANN as they relate to concerns of governments, particularly matters where there may be an interaction between ICANN's policies and various laws and international agreements or where they may affect public policy issues (ICANN Bylaws).

Retrieved from "https://icannwiki.org/index.php?title=.shop&oldid=1344170"