Difference between revisions of "ICANN 76"

From ICANNWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 29: Line 29:
  
 
==Transfer Policy Review==
 
==Transfer Policy Review==
Focused on Phase 2 (aka Group 2) Topics
+
The Transfer Policy Review PDP Working Group focused on Phase 2 (aka Group 2) Topics and discussed:<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/TPRPDP/2023-03-11+ICANN76+Transfer+Policy+Review+PDP+WG+Call Transfer Policy Review WG Session, ICANN 76]</ref>
 
+
* reducing the cost to reduce barriers to entry; introducing formality, such as accreditation; whether registrants are getting what they need – what current channels are available – settlement, courts (costly), through registrar (TDRP);
 
+
* whether to adjust the TDRP to accommodate registrants, which would require substantial changes or a new separate system.
 +
* gaming or potential gaming of TDRP if available to registrants – could be adjusted for that.
 +
* This WG focuses on transfers between contracted parties, so disputes among registrants could be out of scope.
 +
* if out of scope the WG could make a recommendation to [[GNSO Council]] that a process for registrants could be considered separately.
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
  
 
[[Category:ICANN Meetings]]
 
[[Category:ICANN Meetings]]

Revision as of 18:35, 6 April 2023

ICANN76 Zoom Backgrounds dark 02 icann-meeting.jpg
Dates: 11-16 March 2023

Community Forum

Location: Cancun, Mexico
Venue: Cancun Center
Website: https://76.schedule.icann.org/

ICANN 76 is a Community Forum that will happen in Cancun, Mexico from March 11 through 16 and will have a hybrid format. Registration is available here.

Prep Week

From 27 February to 1 March, there will be sessions[1] on the

Topics

At ICANN 76,

UA

Transfer Policy Review

The Transfer Policy Review PDP Working Group focused on Phase 2 (aka Group 2) Topics and discussed:[4]

  • reducing the cost to reduce barriers to entry; introducing formality, such as accreditation; whether registrants are getting what they need – what current channels are available – settlement, courts (costly), through registrar (TDRP);
  • whether to adjust the TDRP to accommodate registrants, which would require substantial changes or a new separate system.
  • gaming or potential gaming of TDRP if available to registrants – could be adjusted for that.
  • This WG focuses on transfers between contracted parties, so disputes among registrants could be out of scope.
  • if out of scope the WG could make a recommendation to GNSO Council that a process for registrants could be considered separately.

References