Jump to content

Morality and Public Order: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
Saassoln (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Caterina (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:UnderConstruction.png]]
[[Image:UnderConstruction.png]]


'''MOPO''' is an acronym for '''Morality and Public Order'''. [[ICANN]] in mid of 2009 issued a new set of standards for releasing new [[gTLD]]s based on morality and public order. Many people found the new gTLDs objectionable such as the .gay gTLD so ICANN decided to issue standards for morality and public order which will be acceptable worldwide. Relatively an extensive research was performed regarding the cultural and judicial differences between nations and their generally accepted legal norms for morality and public order. On the basis of this research the MOPO standards were set in [[DAG]] version 4 in the Dispute Resolution Policy ([[DRP]]) guidebook and application. <ref>[http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2010/9/25/4639200.html blog.internetgovernance.org]</ref><ref>[http://blog.jothan.com/icann/mopo-the-latest-speed-bump-on-icanns-new-gtld-superhighway/ blog.jothan.com]</ref>
'''MOPO''' is an acronym for '''Morality and Public Order'''. In 2009, [[ICANN]] issued a new set of standards for releasing new [[gTLD]]s based on morality and public order. Many people found the new gTLDs objectionable such as the .gay gTLD so ICANN decided to issue standards for morality and public order which will be acceptable worldwide. Relatively an extensive research was performed regarding the cultural and judicial differences between nations and their generally accepted legal norms for morality and public order. On the basis of this research the MOPO standards were set in [[DAG]] version 4 in the Dispute Resolution Policy ([[DRP]]) guidebook and application. <ref>[http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2010/9/25/4639200.html blog.internetgovernance.org]</ref><ref>[http://blog.jothan.com/icann/mopo-the-latest-speed-bump-on-icanns-new-gtld-superhighway/ blog.jothan.com]</ref>


MOPO objections were supposed to be based on the inappropriate strings used in the new gTLDs and also the explicit objectionable content on the websites. The standards that ICANN working group proposed based on the wide research are as follows:
MOPO objections were supposed to be based on the inappropriate strings used in the new gTLDs and also the explicit objectionable content on the websites. The standards that ICANN working group proposed based on the wide research are as follows:

Revision as of 09:06, 12 July 2011

MOPO is an acronym for Morality and Public Order. In 2009, ICANN issued a new set of standards for releasing new gTLDs based on morality and public order. Many people found the new gTLDs objectionable such as the .gay gTLD so ICANN decided to issue standards for morality and public order which will be acceptable worldwide. Relatively an extensive research was performed regarding the cultural and judicial differences between nations and their generally accepted legal norms for morality and public order. On the basis of this research the MOPO standards were set in DAG version 4 in the Dispute Resolution Policy (DRP) guidebook and application. [1][2]

MOPO objections were supposed to be based on the inappropriate strings used in the new gTLDs and also the explicit objectionable content on the websites. The standards that ICANN working group proposed based on the wide research are as follows:

  1. The new TLD or web content should not provide Incitement to or promotion of violent lawless action.
  2. The web content or TLD should not provide Incitement to or promotion of discrimination based upon race, color, gender, ethnicity, religion or national origin.
  3. The website or TLD should avoid Incitement to or promotion of child pornography or other sexual abuse of children.[3]

Most of the nations have legal norms for crimes based on Morality and Public Order. The GNSO proposed to initiate a standardized system based on MOPO common to all the countries linked to ICANN. Similarly, it was stated by GNSO in its final report as "Strings must not be contrary to generally accepted legal norms relating to morality and public order that are recognized under international principles of law".[4]

This recommendation by the GNSO was opposed by most of the committees. The NCUC (Non-Commercial Users Constituency) opposed this MOPO recommendation undermining the following reasons:

  1. It will have a negative impact on the ICANN’s efforts to make the gTLD application process easier and foreseeable and make the evaluation process arbitrary, subjective and political.
  2. It will suppress the freedom to express and diversify on the internet.
  3. ICANN will get involved in many litigation processes due to MOPO. It also may change the ICANN’s focus from its mission of technical coordination and expose it to become an organization which acts to impose legislations based on morality and public order. [5]

Moreover Public comment on the recommendation of MOPO was similar on the grounds that it will not be feasible for ICANN to implement the MOPO standards and their legislation easily. It will increase the complexities rather than simplifying the new gTLD process for ICANN. [6]

Taking the opposition under consideration it was decided to abolish the class of objection based on morality and public order in September 2010. This abolition confirmed that ICANN’s main motive is to provide technical assistance and not delegate itself in legislation of the morality of public and arguing over human rights. ICANN thus by abolishing the MOPO recommendation puts the sole responsibility of maintaining the mortality and public order within a community on its country’s jurisdiction and legal norms. [7]

References[edit | edit source]