Talk:Sarah Langstone: Difference between revisions
Created page with "-In the career history section it seems that the title followed by the company and the time frame make for a more accessible format. I also think it makes more sense to start fro..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
-In the career history section it seems that the title followed by the company and the time frame make for a more accessible format. I also think it makes more sense to start from the present and work backward, though I'd be interested to hear what others have to say. | -In the career history section it seems that the title followed by the company and the time frame make for a more accessible format. I also think it makes more sense to start from the present and work backward, though I'd be interested to hear what others have to say. | ||
: Yeah, I do like the current position at the top and consistency with Title, Company, Timeframe ... | |||
Revision as of 19:10, 8 January 2011
-In the career history section it seems that the title followed by the company and the time frame make for a more accessible format. I also think it makes more sense to start from the present and work backward, though I'd be interested to hear what others have to say.
- Yeah, I do like the current position at the top and consistency with Title, Company, Timeframe ...