Jump to content

Specific Trademark Issues: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
Caterina (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Caterina (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:


The STI published a report in which it provided its vital recommendations regarding the creation of a [[TMC | Trademark Clearinghouse]] and Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure. It was mostly created to protect the trademarks in the new gTLD program. <ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-17dec09-en.htm icann.org]</ref>
The STI published a report in which it provided its vital recommendations regarding the creation of a [[TMC | Trademark Clearinghouse]] and Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure. It was mostly created to protect the trademarks in the new gTLD program. <ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-17dec09-en.htm icann.org]</ref>
== ICANN and STI ==
The ICANN created the STI to provide the recommendations about how the trademark issues should be handled keeping in mind the new gTLDs program and expansion of the Root. <ref name="link2">[http://www.komaitis.org/1/post/2010/6/my-personal-statement-to-icann-on-its-trademark-policies.html komaitis.org]</ref>


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 19:26, 7 September 2011

Specific Trademark Issues (STI, also Special Trademark Issues) is a resolution adopted by the Generic Names Support Organization (GNSO) on 28 October 2009. It was originally proposed by the GNSO when ICANN sent a letter to the GNSO requesting to review the policy implications of specific trademark protection mechanisms for the sake of the proposed new gTLD Program.

STI-DT[edit | edit source]

The GNSO created the STI-DT for the task of analyzing the specific rights protection mechanisms, which needed to be included in the Draft Application Guidebook or DAG.. It consisted of the following representatives:

Members consisted mostly of attorneys and others with experience in trademark law and the Internet.

Principles[edit | edit source]

The STI works on the following principles:

  1. Unanimous consensus
  2. Rough consensus: This is a situation wherein there is a small minority that disagrees about a topic but majority agree
  3. Strong support: This means that there is a large number of opposition
  4. No consensus [1]

Work[edit | edit source]

The STI after its creation was assigned a huge task which included processing and addressing trademark issues as well as providing solutions to the benefit of both the non-commercial users as well as those of the trademark owners and the DNS community as a whole. [2]

The STI published a report in which it provided its vital recommendations regarding the creation of a Trademark Clearinghouse and Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure. It was mostly created to protect the trademarks in the new gTLD program. [3]

References[edit | edit source]