Governmental Advisory Committee: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Marie Cabural (talk | contribs)
Line 33: Line 33:


==New gTLDs==
==New gTLDs==
A new version, the ninth, of the [[Applicant Guidebook]] was released on January 11th, 2012, by [[ICANN]], just a day before the application window for ICANN's [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD program]] opened. The new version gave much greater power to the GAC in forcing the [[ICANN Board]] to manually review any application that the committee found problematic. Exactly how many GAC members it would take to cause this review is vague, but it could be as little as one nation's objection. This is a significant change given that the ICANN Board had no requirement to heed any GAC objection in the previous guidebook; the board is still able to over-rule any GAC objection.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/gac-gets-more-power-to-block-controversial-gtlds/ GAC Gets More Power to Block Controversial gTLDs, DomainIncite.com]</ref>
On January 11, 2012, the ninth, of the [[Applicant Guidebook]] was released one day prior to the opening window of ICANN's [New gTLD Program|new gTLD program]]. The new version gave greater power to the GAC in forcing the [[ICANN Board]] to manually review any application that the committee found problematic. Exactly how many GAC members it would take to cause this review is vague, but it could be as little as one nation's objection. This is a significant change given that the ICANN Board had no requirement to heed any GAC objection in the previous guidebook; the board is still able to over-rule any GAC objection.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/gac-gets-more-power-to-block-controversial-gtlds/ GAC Gets More Power to Block Controversial gTLDs, DomainIncite.com]</ref>
 
==References==
==References==
{{Reflist}}
{{Reflist}}