.vegas: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|logo = | |logo = | ||
|status = Proposed | |status = Proposed | ||
|manager = | |manager = | ||
|country = | |country = | ||
|language = | |language = | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|type = [[GeoTLD|geographical TLD]] | |type = [[GeoTLD|geographical TLD]] | ||
|community = | |community = | ||
|keypeople = | |keypeople = | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''.vegas''' is a proposed new [[GeoTLD|geographical TLD]] to [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD expansion program]] | '''.vegas''' is a proposed new [[GeoTLD|geographical TLD]] to [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD expansion program]]. | ||
==Applicants== | |||
* [[Dot Vegas Inc.]] is one of the contenders to serve as registry operator for the domain name string. The company started preparing its application for the .vegas TLD since 2007. Its application with ICANN is supported by the Las Vegas City Council, the City of North Las Vegas, Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, the Nevada Development Authority, and the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce. <ref>[http://www.dotvegas.com/blog/las-vegas-city-council-selects-dot-vegas-inc-%E2%80%99s-application-of-vegas-as-top-level-domain/ LAS VEGAS CITY COUNCIL SELECTS DOT VEGAS, INC.’S APPLICATION OF .VEGAS AS TOP-LEVEL DOMAIN]</ref> | |||
[http://www.lvrj.com/news/council-endorsement-for-vegas-doman-questioned-83527582.html Council endorsement for .vegas domain questioned]</ref> Greenspun's application is supported by Clark County. The company offered a $1.50 revenue share to the county for every registered domain name or 10 percent of the yearly gross revenue. <ref>[http://www.domainpulse.com/2011/04/19/rival-las-vegas-bids-for-vegas-sees-city-v-county/ Rival Las Vegas Bids for .VEGAS Sees City v County]</ref> | |||
The Las Vegas City Government Dot Vegas Inc. application with ICANN and signed a revenue-sharing agreement. Based on their agreement, the city will receive $0.75 for every .vegas domain name registered or 10 percent of the company's gross annual revenue per year if ICANN approves its application. [[James Trevino]], CEO & President of Dot Vegas Inc. expects 300,000 to 500,000 domain names will be registered during the first year of operation of the .vegas TLD. <ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2010/01/20/how-many-registration-can-vegas-expect/ How Many Registrations Can .Vegas Expect?]</ref> [[James Trevino]] is the CEO & President Dot Vegas Inc. | |||
*[[Greenspun Corp.]], operator of Vegas.com is also applying for the .vegas gTLD. [[Brian Greenspun]], Chairman & CEO of the company questioned the endorsement of the Las Vegas City Council to Dot Vegas Inc. aAccording to him, his company can offer better revenue-sharing agreement. He said, the ''"The city could do better than that at $1 per registrant."'' <ref> | |||
[http://www.lvrj.com/news/council-endorsement-for-vegas-doman-questioned-83527582.html Council endorsement for .vegas domain questioned]</ref> | |||
Greenspun's application is supported by Clark County. The company offered a $1.50 revenue share to the county for every registered domain name or 10 percent of the yearly gross revenue. <ref>[http://www.domainpulse.com/2011/04/19/rival-las-vegas-bids-for-vegas-sees-city-v-county/ Rival Las Vegas Bids for .VEGAS Sees City v County]</ref> Commissioner Steve Sisolak believed that Clark County should also earn revenue from the TLD. He said that he offered a partnership agreement with the Las Vegas City government to share the revenue that will be generated from the TLD but the proposal was rejected by Mayor Oscar Goodman. This prompted him to encourage his fellow commissioners from Clark County to support Greenspun's application for the .vegas string. <ref> | |||
[http://www.lvrj.com/news/county-backs-vegas_com-for-web-domain-84529522.html Decision pits county against city on '.vegas']</ref> | [http://www.lvrj.com/news/county-backs-vegas_com-for-web-domain-84529522.html Decision pits county against city on '.vegas']</ref> | ||
Revision as of 21:01, 12 June 2012
| Status: | Proposed |
| Type: | geographical TLD |
More information: 
| |
.vegas is a proposed new geographical TLD to ICANN's new gTLD expansion program.
Applicants[edit | edit source]
- Dot Vegas Inc. is one of the contenders to serve as registry operator for the domain name string. The company started preparing its application for the .vegas TLD since 2007. Its application with ICANN is supported by the Las Vegas City Council, the City of North Las Vegas, Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, the Nevada Development Authority, and the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce. [1]
The Las Vegas City Government Dot Vegas Inc. application with ICANN and signed a revenue-sharing agreement. Based on their agreement, the city will receive $0.75 for every .vegas domain name registered or 10 percent of the company's gross annual revenue per year if ICANN approves its application. James Trevino, CEO & President of Dot Vegas Inc. expects 300,000 to 500,000 domain names will be registered during the first year of operation of the .vegas TLD. [2] James Trevino is the CEO & President Dot Vegas Inc.
- Greenspun Corp., operator of Vegas.com is also applying for the .vegas gTLD. Brian Greenspun, Chairman & CEO of the company questioned the endorsement of the Las Vegas City Council to Dot Vegas Inc. aAccording to him, his company can offer better revenue-sharing agreement. He said, the "The city could do better than that at $1 per registrant." [3]
Greenspun's application is supported by Clark County. The company offered a $1.50 revenue share to the county for every registered domain name or 10 percent of the yearly gross revenue. [4] Commissioner Steve Sisolak believed that Clark County should also earn revenue from the TLD. He said that he offered a partnership agreement with the Las Vegas City government to share the revenue that will be generated from the TLD but the proposal was rejected by Mayor Oscar Goodman. This prompted him to encourage his fellow commissioners from Clark County to support Greenspun's application for the .vegas string. [5]